There's something refreshing about a politician who picks their stance on an issue, and sticks to it. That's what Rob Ford continues to do with Toronto Star. The newspaper printed a 2010 story about Ford and a possible physical confrontation with a high-school football player over a bad performance on the field. It even says witnesses interviewed even disagree on what actually happened that day. The story was proven wrong by the Globe & Mail, and the Star hasn't apologized for their error.
And the newspaper is supposedly paying the price. Ford has cut off all access to himself and will not grant them an interview until they apologize for the story. According to the Star as well, they have allegedly not been getting the news releases on the Mayor's appearances and schedule from his office. Being a journalist, this should be a space where I rant on about the freedom of the press to say whatever we want. But frankly on this one I agree with Mayor Ford.
I agree with Ford because as a Journalist I'm well aware that my professional reputation rests on my stories, and the facts contained in them. If I'm unable to confirm a fact or figure; or in this case someone's eye witness account it doesn't go into the story, period. If I publish something that has been clearly proven wrong such as this has been by the Globe & Mail, then I would have no problem admitting I'm wrong. It might stink having to swallow my pride but I'd admit it, and apologize.
The Star's claims that it hasn't been receiving press releases and media advisories from Mayor Ford's office rings completely bogus to me. The Toronto Star is one of Canada's leading daily newspapers, you can't tell me their journalists don't have their "anonymous sources" in the Mayor's Office, or one or two councillors who might happen to be at the same events as Mr. Ford that are talking to the newspaper or willing to share their schedules.
I haven't been at this media business very long, but I have realized two things especially when it comes to politicians; it's about relationships, and access. You have to have one to get the other; if your relationship sours with someone then it's pretty much game over on the access side of things.
This whole story seems to be a self-made one for the Star designed to try and sell newspapers and it leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Today's installment was a transcript of an interview Mr. Ford gave to Am640's John Oakley about his apparent "boycott" of the paper. Ford said he encourages people to read the Globe & Mail, and the Sun instead of the Star. He also told a story about how they had a party for his newly departed Press Secretary for council, and the media but the Toronto Star were the only ones who didn't show up.
That was the newspaper's choice; and they shouldn't complain about being excluded. It's time the Star either stayed quiet and take the consequences of its actions- and maybe someday when the Mayor is in a kinder mood have its access restored. Or they could just buck up, admit they were wrong, and apologize.
Thursday, December 1, 2011
Monday, November 28, 2011
Milton's Velodrome Quest
I've been following the Velodrome saga for a while. I did some reporting for Hamilton's Open File website, and in following affairs in the steel city, watched parts of a committee meeting on their attempts to nail down city funding for the project. As we all know by now Hamilton city council failed to approve the required money. As the saying goes; whenever one door closes, another opens.
When Milton was first talking about bidding for it I was skeptical. I was convinced the Toronto bid team were just playing municipalities off against each other in an effort to get what they wanted from Hamilton. In reading the report, I'm here today to say it looks like I was wrong. Milton is serious about this, and has gotten some serious money on the table from top private donors; I've been told there are some in town who see this as a money making opportunity. If it can be done with minimal impact to the tax base, then more power to them
The more I keep reading about it, the more I'm excited about it. Among the suggested sites for it is the likely future Milton Education Village out at the corner of Tremaine Rd, and Derry. And it's got Wilfrid Laurier University's full backing. The University realizes the potential uses of the velodrome as a multi-use facility to live on well after the Games. Should the velodrome go ahead, it will mean the certain approval for Wilfrid Laurier to begin work on its Milton Campus; a major change for this community.
Should Milton be successful it would put us on the map, as not just the town southwest of Toronto. Instead it would become the cycling capital of Canada, and a headquarters to the Ontario Cycling Association. The association looks upon this as a legacy that might not occur again in Canada's most populated area for decades. And indeed, this is a chance of a lifetime, and it's taken guts to after it. That's something I applaud Council for; it's been a while since an idea from any level of government has caught my imagination. But a caution; for every one person such as myself, there are others who are a little bit more cynical, and see the weaknesses in it.
However despite the positive vibes, and energy coming from Milton on this it I don't think it's over. Hamilton could be gearing up for a fight; Councilor McHattie would like to see the City continue its quest for the velodrome. According to the motion seen here, he feels the city could raise an additional $5 million through the sale of lands in the West Harbour area of the city. It hasn't yet been before council, and in reading the blog, there's no guarantee it will be, but the idea is there Milton could be in for a fight, but it's winnable.
When Milton was first talking about bidding for it I was skeptical. I was convinced the Toronto bid team were just playing municipalities off against each other in an effort to get what they wanted from Hamilton. In reading the report, I'm here today to say it looks like I was wrong. Milton is serious about this, and has gotten some serious money on the table from top private donors; I've been told there are some in town who see this as a money making opportunity. If it can be done with minimal impact to the tax base, then more power to them
The more I keep reading about it, the more I'm excited about it. Among the suggested sites for it is the likely future Milton Education Village out at the corner of Tremaine Rd, and Derry. And it's got Wilfrid Laurier University's full backing. The University realizes the potential uses of the velodrome as a multi-use facility to live on well after the Games. Should the velodrome go ahead, it will mean the certain approval for Wilfrid Laurier to begin work on its Milton Campus; a major change for this community.
Should Milton be successful it would put us on the map, as not just the town southwest of Toronto. Instead it would become the cycling capital of Canada, and a headquarters to the Ontario Cycling Association. The association looks upon this as a legacy that might not occur again in Canada's most populated area for decades. And indeed, this is a chance of a lifetime, and it's taken guts to after it. That's something I applaud Council for; it's been a while since an idea from any level of government has caught my imagination. But a caution; for every one person such as myself, there are others who are a little bit more cynical, and see the weaknesses in it.
However despite the positive vibes, and energy coming from Milton on this it I don't think it's over. Hamilton could be gearing up for a fight; Councilor McHattie would like to see the City continue its quest for the velodrome. According to the motion seen here, he feels the city could raise an additional $5 million through the sale of lands in the West Harbour area of the city. It hasn't yet been before council, and in reading the blog, there's no guarantee it will be, but the idea is there Milton could be in for a fight, but it's winnable.
Friday, November 18, 2011
A Sympathetic Ear
A good cup of coffee was always worth the wait; it's a policy that has found me standing in line for many a cold morning. This morning at the Athenian was no different as I stood huddled in my coat just inside the front door. The lineup was moving quickly; before I knew it, I was inside, undoing my zipper against the warmth.
I looked around; the place was packed; all the easy chairs, couches, and tables taken, and the place abuzz with conversation. Only one seat remained at a table in a darkened corner, and even that had an occupant; Odysseus, the mysterious hero newly back from his years of travel. I stepped up ordering my coffee; the barrista followed my gaze;
"He comes here everyday, and sits staring sightlessly out the window for hours."
"What does he take in his coffee? I ask. If I was going to have to sit with him, I may as well bring him something The server poured his to order, and I balanced them both making my way to the table.
"Is this seat taken?" I ask to be nice. He motioned to the chair;
"By all means, take it" I set his coffee in front of him, and busied myself settling in. I shrugged out of my coat, draping it over the back of the chair. My gloves I shoved in the coat sleeves with my hat. I nervously ran a hand through my hair. At last I was ready to begin drinking my coffee. I gingerly sipped at first, savouring the fragrant aroma, and the smooth taste. As I did so I contemplated my table mate; He just sat there; staring sightlessly his facial expression blank. On a closer look his face was lightly scarred under one eye- I wondered briefly how he got that. After a few minutes he let out a sigh so full of frustration, and sadness that it invited conversation.
"I know exactly how you feel," my one sentence brought him out of his daze. His gaze switched to me expectantly. He picked up the coffee I brought him, and sipped it. I continued:
"Life can be frustrating sometimes- like hitting your head repeatedly against a brick wall without a helmet. Take me for instance. It feels like I've been searching for a job for most of my adult life- certainly as long you've been away.
"I started off working in retail; a clerk at a video store. That job was the most fun; I got paid to watch movies, talk about movies. Who wouldn't want to do that?" That got a response from him:
"I'd love a job like that."
"I know. That lasted two years, and helped me pay for a year at Sheridan doing their New Media Journalism program. I loved every minute of it; it was exactly what I wanted to do with my life. I remember we had to do an internship, and I did mine at a radio station, overnight in Toronto."
"That must have been exciting," he commented.
"It wasn't really. Toronto can be surprisingly dull during the overnight hours, which, is odd considering the amount of murders, etc. you hear about in the media. The best part of that was watching the morning show come in, and set up; it was like watching a well-oiled machine. I learned a lot form that, and it gave me a taste for radio. I'd love to work at a radio station someday."
"Oh." He sipped the coffee again, and made me think he was lapsing into silence. He swallowed;
"Continue."
"After Sheridan, I volunteered at my local cable station. That lasted a few months; and got me doing some on-camera and voice over work. It led me to my first paying gig as print reporter. I couldn't believe my luck! I was paid to do what I love for a living. I made the front pages frequently- one time even occupying it fully." I sipped my coffee, letting him take those achievements in.
"Your family must have been thrilled to see your name in print."
"They were. My grandmother even kept all of my clippings." I thought of the pile on a shelf in my home office; I should really do something with those; put them in a binder or portfolio or something.
"And then..." He prompted me.
"I worked at that for a year, and decided to begin looking elsewhere. And I found it, funny enough through that job. There was this crew wearing black T-shirts around with cameras taping everything, so I grabbed a business card and before I knew it I was working for them writing their magazine. The company opened a television station and I was in charge of scheduling the studio time, news crew shoots, and producing as well as writing the news."
"That must have been a lot of work,"
"It was. But it was fun and I worked with some amazing people; we made a great time. We did some really cool stuff."
"I'm sure you did. A career in television... wow. I couldn't do it."
"Yes you could. You're handsome enough, trust me." He smiled;
"Thank you for the compliment. You speak of it in the past tense what happened..."
"It closed up a while back. It was a start-up company, there were money issues. It sucked; because that job was the closest I'd gotten to a full-time job."
"I see. That's tough luck. What have you done since?" He showed genuine interest for the first time in our conversation. I sipped coffee for a moment.
"I'm back to freelancing again; this time for an online news organization. And now it looks like that's closing too." I drained the cup, and sat back.
"Actually now I've come to think of it; every place I've worked now closed."
"You sound as cursed by bad luck as I was in my travels," he commented.
"I prefer to think of it as simply there was only really one of me. And they couldn't survive after I left, so they closed. It helps my ego." We laughed at my joke.
"I see. He drained his cup;
"Where have you been applying to so far?"
"Here and there. Do you know I've sent at least a dozen resumes into the CBC since June and I haven't heard a thing back? You'd think somebody would get the hint already."
He shrugged his shoulders;"You may hear back. Government runs on its own time lines."
"True. CTV on the other hand has called me back. Two months after I applied for a job in Regina they called asking me for links to reports I'd done, and photos. of me So I am getting somewhere."
"It seems like it. It also seems like you've got the right attitude. Apply for anything, anywhere and you never know where life will take you."
"Well that's the general plan anyway. After all I've got nothing to lose right?"
"Exactly. That was my attitude- and I ended up seeing the world." He drained his coffee and rose;
"Well, I should get going. I have to be at work."
"It was good talking to you- I had fun. Maybe next time you can talk about your troubles. There's gotta be a few stories there."
He shrugged: "It was good talking to you too. We all need a sympathetic ear every so often." I watched him leave. The server came over to her table;
"That was the most animated I've seen him weeks. What did you do?"
I smiled: "I told him a story. He listened; it worked for both of us." The server poured me another coffee;
"It's on the house. You've done a good deed. I can't get him to say two words to me."
"Thanks." I stayed for a few more minutes sipping it gently before leaving myself.
I looked around; the place was packed; all the easy chairs, couches, and tables taken, and the place abuzz with conversation. Only one seat remained at a table in a darkened corner, and even that had an occupant; Odysseus, the mysterious hero newly back from his years of travel. I stepped up ordering my coffee; the barrista followed my gaze;
"He comes here everyday, and sits staring sightlessly out the window for hours."
"What does he take in his coffee? I ask. If I was going to have to sit with him, I may as well bring him something The server poured his to order, and I balanced them both making my way to the table.
"Is this seat taken?" I ask to be nice. He motioned to the chair;
"By all means, take it" I set his coffee in front of him, and busied myself settling in. I shrugged out of my coat, draping it over the back of the chair. My gloves I shoved in the coat sleeves with my hat. I nervously ran a hand through my hair. At last I was ready to begin drinking my coffee. I gingerly sipped at first, savouring the fragrant aroma, and the smooth taste. As I did so I contemplated my table mate; He just sat there; staring sightlessly his facial expression blank. On a closer look his face was lightly scarred under one eye- I wondered briefly how he got that. After a few minutes he let out a sigh so full of frustration, and sadness that it invited conversation.
"I know exactly how you feel," my one sentence brought him out of his daze. His gaze switched to me expectantly. He picked up the coffee I brought him, and sipped it. I continued:
"Life can be frustrating sometimes- like hitting your head repeatedly against a brick wall without a helmet. Take me for instance. It feels like I've been searching for a job for most of my adult life- certainly as long you've been away.
"I started off working in retail; a clerk at a video store. That job was the most fun; I got paid to watch movies, talk about movies. Who wouldn't want to do that?" That got a response from him:
"I'd love a job like that."
"I know. That lasted two years, and helped me pay for a year at Sheridan doing their New Media Journalism program. I loved every minute of it; it was exactly what I wanted to do with my life. I remember we had to do an internship, and I did mine at a radio station, overnight in Toronto."
"That must have been exciting," he commented.
"It wasn't really. Toronto can be surprisingly dull during the overnight hours, which, is odd considering the amount of murders, etc. you hear about in the media. The best part of that was watching the morning show come in, and set up; it was like watching a well-oiled machine. I learned a lot form that, and it gave me a taste for radio. I'd love to work at a radio station someday."
"Oh." He sipped the coffee again, and made me think he was lapsing into silence. He swallowed;
"Continue."
"After Sheridan, I volunteered at my local cable station. That lasted a few months; and got me doing some on-camera and voice over work. It led me to my first paying gig as print reporter. I couldn't believe my luck! I was paid to do what I love for a living. I made the front pages frequently- one time even occupying it fully." I sipped my coffee, letting him take those achievements in.
"Your family must have been thrilled to see your name in print."
"They were. My grandmother even kept all of my clippings." I thought of the pile on a shelf in my home office; I should really do something with those; put them in a binder or portfolio or something.
"And then..." He prompted me.
"I worked at that for a year, and decided to begin looking elsewhere. And I found it, funny enough through that job. There was this crew wearing black T-shirts around with cameras taping everything, so I grabbed a business card and before I knew it I was working for them writing their magazine. The company opened a television station and I was in charge of scheduling the studio time, news crew shoots, and producing as well as writing the news."
"That must have been a lot of work,"
"It was. But it was fun and I worked with some amazing people; we made a great time. We did some really cool stuff."
"I'm sure you did. A career in television... wow. I couldn't do it."
"Yes you could. You're handsome enough, trust me." He smiled;
"Thank you for the compliment. You speak of it in the past tense what happened..."
"It closed up a while back. It was a start-up company, there were money issues. It sucked; because that job was the closest I'd gotten to a full-time job."
"I see. That's tough luck. What have you done since?" He showed genuine interest for the first time in our conversation. I sipped coffee for a moment.
"I'm back to freelancing again; this time for an online news organization. And now it looks like that's closing too." I drained the cup, and sat back.
"Actually now I've come to think of it; every place I've worked now closed."
"You sound as cursed by bad luck as I was in my travels," he commented.
"I prefer to think of it as simply there was only really one of me. And they couldn't survive after I left, so they closed. It helps my ego." We laughed at my joke.
"I see. He drained his cup;
"Where have you been applying to so far?"
"Here and there. Do you know I've sent at least a dozen resumes into the CBC since June and I haven't heard a thing back? You'd think somebody would get the hint already."
He shrugged his shoulders;"You may hear back. Government runs on its own time lines."
"True. CTV on the other hand has called me back. Two months after I applied for a job in Regina they called asking me for links to reports I'd done, and photos. of me So I am getting somewhere."
"It seems like it. It also seems like you've got the right attitude. Apply for anything, anywhere and you never know where life will take you."
"Well that's the general plan anyway. After all I've got nothing to lose right?"
"Exactly. That was my attitude- and I ended up seeing the world." He drained his coffee and rose;
"Well, I should get going. I have to be at work."
"It was good talking to you- I had fun. Maybe next time you can talk about your troubles. There's gotta be a few stories there."
He shrugged: "It was good talking to you too. We all need a sympathetic ear every so often." I watched him leave. The server came over to her table;
"That was the most animated I've seen him weeks. What did you do?"
I smiled: "I told him a story. He listened; it worked for both of us." The server poured me another coffee;
"It's on the house. You've done a good deed. I can't get him to say two words to me."
"Thanks." I stayed for a few more minutes sipping it gently before leaving myself.
Wednesday, October 26, 2011
Frank Klees as Speaker: Genius or Jackass move?
Frank Klees has been many things in his public life- a cabinet minister under Mike Harris, an opposition critic under Tim Hudak, and a leadership hopeful finishing second twice. And now it looks like he could be the Speaker of the Provincial Legislature; a position vital to the government's survival in the context of a minority government.
On the surface Klees' candidacy could be viewed as a betrayal to his party. It cripples the opposition by taking the seat away, and helps the Liberals quest to govern as a majority. The Speaker's role is to be neutral and keep order in the house- usually voting with the government in matters of confidence. And here's where the genius part comes in. While it is accepted convention to vote with the government, there is nothing that says Klees should he win the role must do so. He could potentially use the role to put the Liberals' feet to the fire on some of their promises. He could use the position to force compromises, and potentially accomplish something for his party.
Or it could be a totally jackass move, that will blow up in his face. The fact is his candidacy is viewed by some in his party as a betrayal. It makes Tim Hudak look a bit of a fool- a few days after saying nobody in his party has any interest in the position, Klees announces he does have interest. It's a huge gamble for him; the Speaker becomes a powerful job in a minority Parliament-the arguable perception is he gave up the collective good- a combined opposition force with a majority of the power for his own self-interest. This does nothing to make any friends in any party. If he loses, he goes back to his own party, and although he'll likely be welcomed back into the fold I'd imagine there'll be no love lost.
I wonder if Mr Klees has thought this one out. Should he win the position, he'll have to strike a delicate balance between party loyalty, and plunging the province into yet another election. Taking his seat out of the equation we'd be sitting with a statistical dead heat; it makes me wonder if this new/old provincial government would get anything done at all. We may be in for a very short mandate- or a very long one stuck in the muddy world of party politics.
This either is a genius move should he win; The P.C.'s could learn to live with it using him to their advantage in that role. Or it's a totally jackass move that portrays him in an unflattering light as the typical politician who places self-interest above all else including party loyalty. At this point it could go either way.
On the surface Klees' candidacy could be viewed as a betrayal to his party. It cripples the opposition by taking the seat away, and helps the Liberals quest to govern as a majority. The Speaker's role is to be neutral and keep order in the house- usually voting with the government in matters of confidence. And here's where the genius part comes in. While it is accepted convention to vote with the government, there is nothing that says Klees should he win the role must do so. He could potentially use the role to put the Liberals' feet to the fire on some of their promises. He could use the position to force compromises, and potentially accomplish something for his party.
Or it could be a totally jackass move, that will blow up in his face. The fact is his candidacy is viewed by some in his party as a betrayal. It makes Tim Hudak look a bit of a fool- a few days after saying nobody in his party has any interest in the position, Klees announces he does have interest. It's a huge gamble for him; the Speaker becomes a powerful job in a minority Parliament-the arguable perception is he gave up the collective good- a combined opposition force with a majority of the power for his own self-interest. This does nothing to make any friends in any party. If he loses, he goes back to his own party, and although he'll likely be welcomed back into the fold I'd imagine there'll be no love lost.
I wonder if Mr Klees has thought this one out. Should he win the position, he'll have to strike a delicate balance between party loyalty, and plunging the province into yet another election. Taking his seat out of the equation we'd be sitting with a statistical dead heat; it makes me wonder if this new/old provincial government would get anything done at all. We may be in for a very short mandate- or a very long one stuck in the muddy world of party politics.
This either is a genius move should he win; The P.C.'s could learn to live with it using him to their advantage in that role. Or it's a totally jackass move that portrays him in an unflattering light as the typical politician who places self-interest above all else including party loyalty. At this point it could go either way.
Saturday, October 22, 2011
Occupy Toronto
I've been struggling with what to say about it for the last week And it all comes down to the fact that I get it. As corny as it sounds- I am the 99%. I'm 29 years old, with a Bachelor of Arts Degree in History and Contemporary Studies (2004), and a post-graduate certificate in New Media Journalism (2008). I live at home with my parents, and am carrying around a $5 thousand debt. I'm living at home because despite my best efforts, I have been unable to find a full-time job- the best I've been able to do is freelance positions.
Part of it is the field I've chosen; journalism is a really hard one to break into. And I've never expected it to be easy but I've decided to be persistent and stay the course... my hard work has in some measure been rewarded. Another is the economy; there was a period of time where media organizations were laying off, as I was applying for jobs. The job market is still poor no matter what field you're in.
Another part of it is that despite whatever factors that may have led to my current circumstances; there is a problem. I know of quite a few people in a similar situation to mine; those educated in a given field who want to make a living at it, and yet can't find jobs. So they're stuck either working at part-time jobs, or unemployed and at home. And if the younger section of society is having this difficult a time finding a job then it is probably time to start asking the tough questions about how it went this far.
Honestly as I've been thinking about this as it applies to my own situation I've found it's all about mindset, and perspective . The job searching process can be incredibly frustrating; I felt like I've been knocking my head against the brick wall on some days. But I've tried to remain positive and remember that every position I've had has been a step forward. And I've had the chance to cover amazing stories- the St. Paul's Church Fire, interview political candidates; met cabinet ministers, and talked to passionate people with interesting tales to tell. I've also through those positions, and interviews made some great friends. And I've been lucky too that while I have money coming in through my freelance position, I know there are others who don't have that.
As my seemingly endless search for a permanent job continues I have wondered if this... whatever this undefinable thing is more of a symptom of a societal shift rather than a cause for protest. Technology has made our lives easier; it's made our jobs easier. People can work from home; jobs can be done online. My generation has been told for a while that we'll have more than one career in our lives. Maybe what we're turning into is perhaps a society where thanks to technology we can have more than one career happening at once.
It could be governments are slow to respond, because they like the rest of us know there's something that's off- they just can't define it yet. And how do you solve a problem you can't define? The only thing to do is to wait and see what develops then change to respond.
We have to remember that we are in Canada phenomenally lucky to have survived the worst of the economic downturn. We're lucky that while the US, and EU are struggling, we're generally still pretty prosperous in the grand scheme of things. Despite this though, there is obviously something undefinable happening here. We just have to wait and see what happens, then respond.
Part of it is the field I've chosen; journalism is a really hard one to break into. And I've never expected it to be easy but I've decided to be persistent and stay the course... my hard work has in some measure been rewarded. Another is the economy; there was a period of time where media organizations were laying off, as I was applying for jobs. The job market is still poor no matter what field you're in.
Another part of it is that despite whatever factors that may have led to my current circumstances; there is a problem. I know of quite a few people in a similar situation to mine; those educated in a given field who want to make a living at it, and yet can't find jobs. So they're stuck either working at part-time jobs, or unemployed and at home. And if the younger section of society is having this difficult a time finding a job then it is probably time to start asking the tough questions about how it went this far.
Honestly as I've been thinking about this as it applies to my own situation I've found it's all about mindset, and perspective . The job searching process can be incredibly frustrating; I felt like I've been knocking my head against the brick wall on some days. But I've tried to remain positive and remember that every position I've had has been a step forward. And I've had the chance to cover amazing stories- the St. Paul's Church Fire, interview political candidates; met cabinet ministers, and talked to passionate people with interesting tales to tell. I've also through those positions, and interviews made some great friends. And I've been lucky too that while I have money coming in through my freelance position, I know there are others who don't have that.
As my seemingly endless search for a permanent job continues I have wondered if this... whatever this undefinable thing is more of a symptom of a societal shift rather than a cause for protest. Technology has made our lives easier; it's made our jobs easier. People can work from home; jobs can be done online. My generation has been told for a while that we'll have more than one career in our lives. Maybe what we're turning into is perhaps a society where thanks to technology we can have more than one career happening at once.
It could be governments are slow to respond, because they like the rest of us know there's something that's off- they just can't define it yet. And how do you solve a problem you can't define? The only thing to do is to wait and see what develops then change to respond.
We have to remember that we are in Canada phenomenally lucky to have survived the worst of the economic downturn. We're lucky that while the US, and EU are struggling, we're generally still pretty prosperous in the grand scheme of things. Despite this though, there is obviously something undefinable happening here. We just have to wait and see what happens, then respond.
Thursday, October 13, 2011
Lisa Raitt vs. Air Canada Round 4
As corny, and cliched as this sounds I can see both sides on this one. On the one hand, there's a solid economic argument here for making the flight attendants an essential service. A strike could potentially ground hundreds of flights angering thousands of passengers who won't re-book with Air Canada.. ever. This could cost the airline a fair bit of money. And how much would it cost businesses who despite technology still need to meet with their employees face-to-face? Like it or not Air Canada is the only truly national airline and if it flight attendants went out on strike it could at the very least strike a crippling blow to the economy. It is the only "Canadian" airline to fly to Europe, and I think it's safe to say Asia.
On the other hand the funny thing about capitalism is the fittest survive. If Air Canada flight attendants were to strike it would significantly weaken the airline, but it would also create opportunity for the others. Air Canada serves a few destinations domestically that the other airlines don't. In its absence I have to believe the smaller airlines like WestJet, and Porter would grow to meet the demand for those destinations as well as the international ones. Air Canada would soon be deflated, and may never regain the customers it would lose.. going with this logic; let them go on strike, and would kill the airline. But thanks to supply and demand, more may rise.
You can never get everything you want in a negotiation. I've heard it mentioned in media reports the flight attendants got at least 80% of what they wanted; in my estimation that's fairly decent. After all, you can't please everyone all the time. If you give people time; everyone will complain about their jobs- Air Canada flight attendants are no different. Yes, there are disgruntled passengers and I'm sure it's a pain in the butt sometimes. Overall, from where I sit, it seems a pretty amazing job; you get paid to travel! How many of us wouldn't give our eye-teeth to do that? I definitely would.
In an ideal world when a company does well it passes the wealth around. The union would have us believe that didn't happen- the higher executives took bonuses, and ignored the workers. If that's what happened, then isn't this a bit of misguided anger? Shouldn't the flight attendants be angry at the Air Canada executives instead of the government?
Unions are here to stay. But now when the economy is so uncertain shouldn't they bend just a little bit? Maybe we should take this moment as a sign that just as the general public have to evolve in their jobs, unions should do the same.
On the other hand the funny thing about capitalism is the fittest survive. If Air Canada flight attendants were to strike it would significantly weaken the airline, but it would also create opportunity for the others. Air Canada serves a few destinations domestically that the other airlines don't. In its absence I have to believe the smaller airlines like WestJet, and Porter would grow to meet the demand for those destinations as well as the international ones. Air Canada would soon be deflated, and may never regain the customers it would lose.. going with this logic; let them go on strike, and would kill the airline. But thanks to supply and demand, more may rise.
You can never get everything you want in a negotiation. I've heard it mentioned in media reports the flight attendants got at least 80% of what they wanted; in my estimation that's fairly decent. After all, you can't please everyone all the time. If you give people time; everyone will complain about their jobs- Air Canada flight attendants are no different. Yes, there are disgruntled passengers and I'm sure it's a pain in the butt sometimes. Overall, from where I sit, it seems a pretty amazing job; you get paid to travel! How many of us wouldn't give our eye-teeth to do that? I definitely would.
In an ideal world when a company does well it passes the wealth around. The union would have us believe that didn't happen- the higher executives took bonuses, and ignored the workers. If that's what happened, then isn't this a bit of misguided anger? Shouldn't the flight attendants be angry at the Air Canada executives instead of the government?
Unions are here to stay. But now when the economy is so uncertain shouldn't they bend just a little bit? Maybe we should take this moment as a sign that just as the general public have to evolve in their jobs, unions should do the same.
CUPE protests in front of Lisa Raitt's riding office
 | |
| Protesters gather in front of Labour Minister Lisa Raitt's Office |
 | |||||||||||
| One of many protest signs |
 | |||||
| Bringing out the heavyweights: Sid Ryan is interviewed |
Video of chanting protesters... remember what I said about the camerawork.
Will have more on this later.
Wednesday, October 12, 2011
A Very Canadian Result
If anyone lost it was oddly enough Dalton McGuinty. He lost 18 seats to his opposition; 11 to the P.C.'s, and 7 to the N.D.P. He ended up one torturous seat short of a majority government. What makes it a Canadian result is the fact Andrea Horwath- the third place party ended up the most powerful, squarely in the position of being the balance of power.
This means the Liberals don't make a move now without either the P.C.'s or the N.D.P. on side with them. I hope everyone sees the wisdom in this. The fact is McGuinty needed a slap on the wrist- and the electorate gave it to him. After having near total power for 8 years the knowledge you have to work with your opponents might be more humbling than a loss. With the lower voter turnout it could be said we voted en masse with our feet.
The results are by no means a ringing endorsement for McGuinty. If anything they're a passive aggressive way of saying we want a change, but the choices we have before us aren't that great. So we'll stick with the guy we had before. It's as if we've put him on notice- we're wising up to your tricks, and your lies. We're putting him in a two-year penalty box, if he minds his manners we may let him back on the ice.
..
The opposition as well has a tough road ahead of them. How they oppose will say a lot for the government's stability. They have to act as a government-in-waiting, and offer alternatives, instead of just going against the McGuinty government for the sake of opposing them. Hudak, and Horwath each have to act as future Premier.
The new government could mean a lot for Milton. Right before the writ dropped, it was announced the Liberals would fund the expansion for Milton Hospital. A minority government could mean the Liberals actually keep that promise. The man tasked with making sure that happens is Ted Chudleigh- returned by the voters in Halton for another term. It could also make Milton Education Village a reality a lot sooner than anyone can hope for.
I don't know how long this will last- but the average life of a minority parliament is 18 months. It's not starting off well- N.D.P. leader Horwath has requested a meeting with McGuinty and Hudak- McGuinty has said no. If McGuinty acts the tiniest bit humble there's nothing to say this can't last four years. However long it lasts, it should be entertaining.
This means the Liberals don't make a move now without either the P.C.'s or the N.D.P. on side with them. I hope everyone sees the wisdom in this. The fact is McGuinty needed a slap on the wrist- and the electorate gave it to him. After having near total power for 8 years the knowledge you have to work with your opponents might be more humbling than a loss. With the lower voter turnout it could be said we voted en masse with our feet.
The results are by no means a ringing endorsement for McGuinty. If anything they're a passive aggressive way of saying we want a change, but the choices we have before us aren't that great. So we'll stick with the guy we had before. It's as if we've put him on notice- we're wising up to your tricks, and your lies. We're putting him in a two-year penalty box, if he minds his manners we may let him back on the ice.
..
The opposition as well has a tough road ahead of them. How they oppose will say a lot for the government's stability. They have to act as a government-in-waiting, and offer alternatives, instead of just going against the McGuinty government for the sake of opposing them. Hudak, and Horwath each have to act as future Premier.
The new government could mean a lot for Milton. Right before the writ dropped, it was announced the Liberals would fund the expansion for Milton Hospital. A minority government could mean the Liberals actually keep that promise. The man tasked with making sure that happens is Ted Chudleigh- returned by the voters in Halton for another term. It could also make Milton Education Village a reality a lot sooner than anyone can hope for.
I don't know how long this will last- but the average life of a minority parliament is 18 months. It's not starting off well- N.D.P. leader Horwath has requested a meeting with McGuinty and Hudak- McGuinty has said no. If McGuinty acts the tiniest bit humble there's nothing to say this can't last four years. However long it lasts, it should be entertaining.
Wednesday, October 5, 2011
How Will It end?
I'm not going to make a prediction- instead I'm going to make a best guess. We will wake up Friday morning to a Progressive Conservative (P.C.) minority government. I started the campaign with this opinion, and nothing has happened to change it much.
The P.C.'s and Liberal platforms are fairly equal. On the Liberal side, if you scratch below the surface- and take a good look at what the ideas are, you'll find them wanting. on the P.C. side there is some more substance. Both are vague in different areas; the Liberals on how they plan to pay for new hospitals, and the P.C.'s on how their platform would benefit cities.
The two parties are matched with mistakes. McGuinty made one with an ill-timed jobs platform and Hudak in the way he responded to it. McGuinty made another one, when he cancelled the power plant in Mississauga; something that is clearly politically motivated. Hudak made one when he released the sex-ed pamphlet with homophobic content. Everyone hates the HST, and nobody will do anything to if not get rid of it outright or at the very least trim the provincial portion. Nobody has taken McGuinty on about Caledonia.
In the end, a government of any stripe has to stand on its record. As unfair as it may seem for McGuinty this means the full eight years. And for all his successes in health care and education; his attempts to get Ontario to buy into Green energy, it's the scandals and broken promises people will remember. In two previous elections he said he wouldn't raise taxes- we now have the health premium and the HST- which even though it could be good for business; sucks for the consumer. Nobody likes paying more.
Hudak isn't perfect. He's hasn't run the best election campaign. He's spent a more time telling us what the NDP, and Liberals won't do for us and not enough telling what a P.C. government would do for us. Even after one year of campaigning, we really don't know him that well; and that's why Ontario voters will only give him a minority.
Andrea Horwath will end up the kingmaker, and I suspect do very well with that role. Her party has run a campaign based on clearly expressed ideas. They've stuck with the positive message of voting for hope, and not fear; and that will ring true with some voters. Bob Rae casts a long shadow over his former party; and there will be those who will remember what it was like when Ontario last had an N.D.P. Premier. That could be enough to keep her from the Premier's chair.
Eight years is a long time for a government to last in power. It's time for change; Hudak is the best placed to deliver that change. Let's give Hudak a chance.
The P.C.'s and Liberal platforms are fairly equal. On the Liberal side, if you scratch below the surface- and take a good look at what the ideas are, you'll find them wanting. on the P.C. side there is some more substance. Both are vague in different areas; the Liberals on how they plan to pay for new hospitals, and the P.C.'s on how their platform would benefit cities.
The two parties are matched with mistakes. McGuinty made one with an ill-timed jobs platform and Hudak in the way he responded to it. McGuinty made another one, when he cancelled the power plant in Mississauga; something that is clearly politically motivated. Hudak made one when he released the sex-ed pamphlet with homophobic content. Everyone hates the HST, and nobody will do anything to if not get rid of it outright or at the very least trim the provincial portion. Nobody has taken McGuinty on about Caledonia.
In the end, a government of any stripe has to stand on its record. As unfair as it may seem for McGuinty this means the full eight years. And for all his successes in health care and education; his attempts to get Ontario to buy into Green energy, it's the scandals and broken promises people will remember. In two previous elections he said he wouldn't raise taxes- we now have the health premium and the HST- which even though it could be good for business; sucks for the consumer. Nobody likes paying more.
Hudak isn't perfect. He's hasn't run the best election campaign. He's spent a more time telling us what the NDP, and Liberals won't do for us and not enough telling what a P.C. government would do for us. Even after one year of campaigning, we really don't know him that well; and that's why Ontario voters will only give him a minority.
Andrea Horwath will end up the kingmaker, and I suspect do very well with that role. Her party has run a campaign based on clearly expressed ideas. They've stuck with the positive message of voting for hope, and not fear; and that will ring true with some voters. Bob Rae casts a long shadow over his former party; and there will be those who will remember what it was like when Ontario last had an N.D.P. Premier. That could be enough to keep her from the Premier's chair.
Eight years is a long time for a government to last in power. It's time for change; Hudak is the best placed to deliver that change. Let's give Hudak a chance.
Thursday, September 29, 2011
Embrace the Conservative Hat Trick
Premier Dalton McGuinty is bringing up the idea of a Conservative Hat Trick. That's a Conservative majority in Ottawa under Harper, a P.C. government at Queen's Park, and a P.C. in the Mayor's seat in Toronto. I don't really find that too scary.
Harper for his part has been a steady hand on the tiller for the economy. We started off not knowing what he was like on a personal level and gave him a minority government; and then slow but steady increased the minority. The N.D.P. is strong enough to stand up to his majority; they've already done it when they filibustered the postal-workers back to work legislation. Even though it's a transitional period as they prepare to choose a new leader I think they'll still find ways to make their message heard.
Toronto Voters chose Rob Ford last October; and they need him. David Miller says he left a $350 million surplus, but so far there are no signs of it. Surplus or not, the city is still in a pretty big hole and something has to give. The cuts will be painful, but if the result is a more prosperous Ontario capital, then isn't it worth it? Toronto voters also chose more federal Conservatives to represent them in Ottawa showing that fear of Conservatives in Toronto might be on the decline.
I don't find anything scary about a possible "Premier Hudak." Polls show a minority with Andrea Horwath in a king-maker role. I think she'd be a strong enough influence at Queen's Park. Polls show a minority mostly because even after months of campaigning we still don't know Tim Hudak that well. Why couldn't we treat Hudak, the same way we treated Harper? Give him a minority for a while, and see what he can do
The whole idea of a "Conservative hat trick" seems more a reaction of a Premier desperate to hold on. His platform is in tatters, and all he has left is a record in which the scandals outweigh the successes. Fear is basically the last tactic open to him. Well I say, embrace the fear- let's give Hudak a try. If we find electing him wasn't the best idea we ever had we can always switch it up in a year or so.
Harper for his part has been a steady hand on the tiller for the economy. We started off not knowing what he was like on a personal level and gave him a minority government; and then slow but steady increased the minority. The N.D.P. is strong enough to stand up to his majority; they've already done it when they filibustered the postal-workers back to work legislation. Even though it's a transitional period as they prepare to choose a new leader I think they'll still find ways to make their message heard.
Toronto Voters chose Rob Ford last October; and they need him. David Miller says he left a $350 million surplus, but so far there are no signs of it. Surplus or not, the city is still in a pretty big hole and something has to give. The cuts will be painful, but if the result is a more prosperous Ontario capital, then isn't it worth it? Toronto voters also chose more federal Conservatives to represent them in Ottawa showing that fear of Conservatives in Toronto might be on the decline.
I don't find anything scary about a possible "Premier Hudak." Polls show a minority with Andrea Horwath in a king-maker role. I think she'd be a strong enough influence at Queen's Park. Polls show a minority mostly because even after months of campaigning we still don't know Tim Hudak that well. Why couldn't we treat Hudak, the same way we treated Harper? Give him a minority for a while, and see what he can do
The whole idea of a "Conservative hat trick" seems more a reaction of a Premier desperate to hold on. His platform is in tatters, and all he has left is a record in which the scandals outweigh the successes. Fear is basically the last tactic open to him. Well I say, embrace the fear- let's give Hudak a try. If we find electing him wasn't the best idea we ever had we can always switch it up in a year or so.
Wednesday, September 28, 2011
Leaders Debate Analyisis
I think Andrea Horwath won the leaders debate last night. She got her policy out the clearest, and seemed at times refreshingly blunt on issues such as health care. She also got in a few good lines; most notably: "Isn't that guy your leader now?" referring to Bob Rae as leader of the federal Liberal Party. Rae I think still casts a long shadow over the Ontario NDP for some voters, and it was important for her to put some distance between them, and she did that using humour.
I wonder where the Tim Hudak shown to us last night was a month ago? He was clear, and more confident on his policies than he ever has been to-date. If he was like that a month ago, this election would be a walk in the park for him. He had the oft-quoted line "Nobody trusts you anymore Mr. McGuinty." I think that's going to turn into a ballot question, and really resonates with voters. Because the fact is- few people do trust him anymore.
The Dalton McGuinty I watched last night was at times tentative. The hand gestures were sometimes stiff, and at others elaborate, and defensive. It's natural to use hand gestures at times to use for all of us- when we're excited or just to illustrate a point. But in McGuinty's case it came across as nervous and defensive. And it was distracting from what he was saying. I wondered if he was trying to flag down Steve Paikin for the cheque or something... maybe reflecting on a past career as a rap artist nobody knows about??
In terms of substance McGuinty was weak. Where the others managed to answer the question, and get in their policy, McGuinty made a habit of answering the question he wished had been asked. The debate was full of issues it seemed he didn't want to talk about. Green Energy- the gas-fired plant he cancelled over the weekend, and the Samsung deal. Jobs: the contentious plan to give 10 thousand to companies who hire foreign workers. The Economy? How to get rid of the $14-16 billion deficit he's racked up. Taxes- the introduction of the HST, and the past broken promises on that subject. He seemed to fall back on his record, which, is so laden with broken promises and scandal it blots out anything he's achieved on the positive side like reducing surgical wait times, and expanding the use of the Primecare Family Health teams.
I don't think this debate makes much difference in terms of voting preferences. But it did crystallise where the parties stand on the issues, and helped differentiate Hudak from McGuinty a little bit more. It made Horwath a legitimate third option, and cemented this election as a three-way contest come October 6, 2011. It's going to be a wild finish.
I wonder where the Tim Hudak shown to us last night was a month ago? He was clear, and more confident on his policies than he ever has been to-date. If he was like that a month ago, this election would be a walk in the park for him. He had the oft-quoted line "Nobody trusts you anymore Mr. McGuinty." I think that's going to turn into a ballot question, and really resonates with voters. Because the fact is- few people do trust him anymore.
The Dalton McGuinty I watched last night was at times tentative. The hand gestures were sometimes stiff, and at others elaborate, and defensive. It's natural to use hand gestures at times to use for all of us- when we're excited or just to illustrate a point. But in McGuinty's case it came across as nervous and defensive. And it was distracting from what he was saying. I wondered if he was trying to flag down Steve Paikin for the cheque or something... maybe reflecting on a past career as a rap artist nobody knows about??
In terms of substance McGuinty was weak. Where the others managed to answer the question, and get in their policy, McGuinty made a habit of answering the question he wished had been asked. The debate was full of issues it seemed he didn't want to talk about. Green Energy- the gas-fired plant he cancelled over the weekend, and the Samsung deal. Jobs: the contentious plan to give 10 thousand to companies who hire foreign workers. The Economy? How to get rid of the $14-16 billion deficit he's racked up. Taxes- the introduction of the HST, and the past broken promises on that subject. He seemed to fall back on his record, which, is so laden with broken promises and scandal it blots out anything he's achieved on the positive side like reducing surgical wait times, and expanding the use of the Primecare Family Health teams.
I don't think this debate makes much difference in terms of voting preferences. But it did crystallise where the parties stand on the issues, and helped differentiate Hudak from McGuinty a little bit more. It made Horwath a legitimate third option, and cemented this election as a three-way contest come October 6, 2011. It's going to be a wild finish.
Sunday, September 25, 2011
Why don't they talk about...
With less than two weeks to go before we enter the voting booth, there are still some things that haven't been talked about this campaign. Here are what I think some of them are:
1. Caledonia: It's still a stalemate over five years later. Hudak, and Horwath could really hammer McGuinty on this one. In my opinion- McGuinty failed in his duty to protect his people. History has a bad habit of repeating itself; fear of a repeat of what happened at Ipperwash probably caused the inaction. It goes to leadership; you see a problem and solve it.
2. The Self-employed: Surveys have shown that although unemployment is growing, so too are the self-employed. The federal government has responded to this, extending maternity/paternity benefits, as well as some health benefits to them. All provincial parties aren't looking at this, and it should be discussed.
3. Affordable Housing: Someone in a recent interview I did pointed out that even though many parts of the province have the same issues, they look different. Homelessness for example looks different in Grimsby than it does in Toronto or even Milton. For example it costs around $700/ month in Grimsby to rent an apartment- expensive; especially when you're a homeless youth with limited job prospects. Even the acknowledgement there is a problem, and it can't be solved with one blanket solution would be a step in the right direction.
4. The "Single" Person: Believe me, I understand the focus on family. It's the core of society- we all start off members of a family. But here's the thing; we all grow up and become fine upstanding tax-paying citizens. Some marry, and have kids of their own. Some choose to remain single. And yet despite all this the "Single person is being ignored. Elections can come down to single vote victories, so remember the single person.
These are just four issues not being discussed. If there's an issue you feel strongly our leaders should tackle, then feel free to leave a comment. Who knows? maybe with a little over week to go, maybe a couple of them will get attention.
1. Caledonia: It's still a stalemate over five years later. Hudak, and Horwath could really hammer McGuinty on this one. In my opinion- McGuinty failed in his duty to protect his people. History has a bad habit of repeating itself; fear of a repeat of what happened at Ipperwash probably caused the inaction. It goes to leadership; you see a problem and solve it.
2. The Self-employed: Surveys have shown that although unemployment is growing, so too are the self-employed. The federal government has responded to this, extending maternity/paternity benefits, as well as some health benefits to them. All provincial parties aren't looking at this, and it should be discussed.
3. Affordable Housing: Someone in a recent interview I did pointed out that even though many parts of the province have the same issues, they look different. Homelessness for example looks different in Grimsby than it does in Toronto or even Milton. For example it costs around $700/ month in Grimsby to rent an apartment- expensive; especially when you're a homeless youth with limited job prospects. Even the acknowledgement there is a problem, and it can't be solved with one blanket solution would be a step in the right direction.
4. The "Single" Person: Believe me, I understand the focus on family. It's the core of society- we all start off members of a family. But here's the thing; we all grow up and become fine upstanding tax-paying citizens. Some marry, and have kids of their own. Some choose to remain single. And yet despite all this the "Single person is being ignored. Elections can come down to single vote victories, so remember the single person.
These are just four issues not being discussed. If there's an issue you feel strongly our leaders should tackle, then feel free to leave a comment. Who knows? maybe with a little over week to go, maybe a couple of them will get attention.
Tuesday, September 20, 2011
Progressive Conservative Platform: A detailed critique
The Progressive Conservatives platform is very oriented around the pocketbook- consistent with some of their core fiscal beliefs you would traditionally associate with the Conservatives. They make several promises around cutting income taxes by 5% on the first $70 thousand per family; putting an estimated $258 into the pocket of a family of four. Who wouldn't want extra money back from the government? But I find myself repeating my criticism of earlier this year: What about the single person? What about the families earning less than $70 thousand; there are a few of those around you know.
Add this one up with the fact HST would be eliminated from hydro bills under a Hudak government and you've got some serious savings. I'm a huge fan of tax breaks- especially when it benefits me. And I can see the logic- give people more of their money back; and they'll spend more, which, will increase the economy and likely produce jobs. But what if this economy remains in its current "iffy" status? Always on the edge of another recession, but not quite prosperous either. This might cause people to pocket the additional savings, and that could freeze the consumer side of the economy.
There is some debate as to whether Hudak can legally exit the Samsung deal; he might have to let that one slide. It's not readily obvious in the platform what the P.C.'s would do in its place. What I would do, is to make it easier for companies dedicated to Green energy a bit of a tax break- developing that kind of technology could be expensive. I'd look for a way to make it a bit more affordable for the consumer as well.
It becomes obvious that Ontario will need more post-secondary spots. The P.C.'s like their Liberal counterparts have plans for 60 thousand new post-secondary spots over the next four years. Their plan is to have schools compete for them- Will there be some kind of criteria the schools have to meet? If so, then what? Will it be in the form of new campuses as the Liberals have promised, or based on program, scattered across the province? Sub question to this; a fair number of high school students around age 17 find themselves heading back to school for what's termed a "victory lap." How do you guys plan to deal with this trend?
The P.C.'s are proposing to give more of a say to municipalities. They seem to be the only party dealing with this particular issue; and it's something definitely pertinent to Milton. The only thing I can see on there is they would end the provincial tinkering with the official plans. What does "increased say" mean? Does it mean municipalities can say "no" to developers and for a change have it actually mean "no? Taking Milton for example again- does it mean municipalities have a bit of a say as to what can go on development charges- like say a hospital?
The Justice side of things is a little thin. Making inmates work on so-called "chain gangs" and the sex registry are both good ideas. But they also seem like populist ideas; things that can be done easier if Hudak is elected to a majority government. What about ways to clear the backlog of the court system? Or looking at tougher sentencing for provincial crimes?
They're planning to eliminate the L.H.I.N.S (Local Health Integration Network), and invest the money in front-line health care. Great- there is no need of an extra layer of bureaucracy that really doesn't help health care much. But how do you do define front line health care- hiring more nurses and doctors? Maybe building and expanding more hospitals? Or implementing more of the Prime-care Family health teams? Or maybe on.. dare I say it, electronic health records? There's lots of ways to spend that money.
Potentially this platform could find the P.C.'s on the government side of the house come October 6. But some of these ideas need a little more thought put into them for it to be fully workable. To read more check out the issues section of their website.
Add this one up with the fact HST would be eliminated from hydro bills under a Hudak government and you've got some serious savings. I'm a huge fan of tax breaks- especially when it benefits me. And I can see the logic- give people more of their money back; and they'll spend more, which, will increase the economy and likely produce jobs. But what if this economy remains in its current "iffy" status? Always on the edge of another recession, but not quite prosperous either. This might cause people to pocket the additional savings, and that could freeze the consumer side of the economy.
There is some debate as to whether Hudak can legally exit the Samsung deal; he might have to let that one slide. It's not readily obvious in the platform what the P.C.'s would do in its place. What I would do, is to make it easier for companies dedicated to Green energy a bit of a tax break- developing that kind of technology could be expensive. I'd look for a way to make it a bit more affordable for the consumer as well.
It becomes obvious that Ontario will need more post-secondary spots. The P.C.'s like their Liberal counterparts have plans for 60 thousand new post-secondary spots over the next four years. Their plan is to have schools compete for them- Will there be some kind of criteria the schools have to meet? If so, then what? Will it be in the form of new campuses as the Liberals have promised, or based on program, scattered across the province? Sub question to this; a fair number of high school students around age 17 find themselves heading back to school for what's termed a "victory lap." How do you guys plan to deal with this trend?
The P.C.'s are proposing to give more of a say to municipalities. They seem to be the only party dealing with this particular issue; and it's something definitely pertinent to Milton. The only thing I can see on there is they would end the provincial tinkering with the official plans. What does "increased say" mean? Does it mean municipalities can say "no" to developers and for a change have it actually mean "no? Taking Milton for example again- does it mean municipalities have a bit of a say as to what can go on development charges- like say a hospital?
The Justice side of things is a little thin. Making inmates work on so-called "chain gangs" and the sex registry are both good ideas. But they also seem like populist ideas; things that can be done easier if Hudak is elected to a majority government. What about ways to clear the backlog of the court system? Or looking at tougher sentencing for provincial crimes?
They're planning to eliminate the L.H.I.N.S (Local Health Integration Network), and invest the money in front-line health care. Great- there is no need of an extra layer of bureaucracy that really doesn't help health care much. But how do you do define front line health care- hiring more nurses and doctors? Maybe building and expanding more hospitals? Or implementing more of the Prime-care Family health teams? Or maybe on.. dare I say it, electronic health records? There's lots of ways to spend that money.
Potentially this platform could find the P.C.'s on the government side of the house come October 6. But some of these ideas need a little more thought put into them for it to be fully workable. To read more check out the issues section of their website.
The N.D. P. Platform critique
The N.D.P. have always had great ideas. But when you ask how much it would cost... that's when it falls apart. This platform is no exception. They have the most realistic approach to the HST; they'd scrap it on home heating oils, and gas for cars- two places where it would save people the most. But the revenue has to be replaced somewhere.
Setting weekly gas prices is in theory a good idea. Nobody else has even tried to solve this problem, and it seems the instant there's an increase on the markets, within hours there's an increase at our local gas stations. There has to be something we can do. But the question I have here is: how do you manage the market increases?
Becoming equal partners in transit development with municipalities is a good idea as well. It is pretty much our collective faults for not developing our transit as we built our roads- this kind of spreads the burden of solving the problem. Where the weakness with their transit plan is in the freeze on fares for four years. Again- a good idea; who doesn't want to pay less for something? The problem is what happens when/ if you take the freeze off? After four years the increase could be a huge deciding factor in whether some people continue to use transit. A better idea might be to somehow tie the increase to the rate of inflation maybe.
The education plank is fairly non-existent. The N.D.P. is looking at tuition freezes, and forgiving the interest on student loans. Both good ideas, but it fails to address the system as a whole. The P.C.'s and Liberals both have grand plans of funding 60 thousand post-secondary spots.
Buying Ontario may be a great soundbite but in practical terms won't work. The provinces are too interdependent on each other. And Ontario is still a powerful part of the overall Canadian economy- Ontarians start buying exclusively Ontario, and the rest of Canada might fail.
Scrapping the LHIN's (Local Health Integrated Network), is something the N.D.P. and their P.C. counterparts agree on. The money saved here (I think around $200 million) would probably offset some of the fees on medical exams, and ambulance fees they plan on getting rid of.
These are some decent ideas there, but is it enough to form a government on? It might be. The N.D.P. have so far been fairly clear on what they will do if elected, and the clarity might be enough to break through the clatter of the other two fighting it out on the negative end of things.
Setting weekly gas prices is in theory a good idea. Nobody else has even tried to solve this problem, and it seems the instant there's an increase on the markets, within hours there's an increase at our local gas stations. There has to be something we can do. But the question I have here is: how do you manage the market increases?
Becoming equal partners in transit development with municipalities is a good idea as well. It is pretty much our collective faults for not developing our transit as we built our roads- this kind of spreads the burden of solving the problem. Where the weakness with their transit plan is in the freeze on fares for four years. Again- a good idea; who doesn't want to pay less for something? The problem is what happens when/ if you take the freeze off? After four years the increase could be a huge deciding factor in whether some people continue to use transit. A better idea might be to somehow tie the increase to the rate of inflation maybe.
The education plank is fairly non-existent. The N.D.P. is looking at tuition freezes, and forgiving the interest on student loans. Both good ideas, but it fails to address the system as a whole. The P.C.'s and Liberals both have grand plans of funding 60 thousand post-secondary spots.
Buying Ontario may be a great soundbite but in practical terms won't work. The provinces are too interdependent on each other. And Ontario is still a powerful part of the overall Canadian economy- Ontarians start buying exclusively Ontario, and the rest of Canada might fail.
Scrapping the LHIN's (Local Health Integrated Network), is something the N.D.P. and their P.C. counterparts agree on. The money saved here (I think around $200 million) would probably offset some of the fees on medical exams, and ambulance fees they plan on getting rid of.
These are some decent ideas there, but is it enough to form a government on? It might be. The N.D.P. have so far been fairly clear on what they will do if elected, and the clarity might be enough to break through the clatter of the other two fighting it out on the negative end of things.
Monday, September 12, 2011
Liberal Platform Critique
I've read the Liberal platform. It flushes out the ideas on their website The Ontario Way," and adds some new ones. For me it comes down to money; there's some pretty good ideas in there. But how do you afford them?
Tuition money for middle-class families? Great idea; post-secondary schools are expensive enough. But how do you qualify "middle class?" Is it through parents' income level? Is it some kind of social definition? Or perhaps its a mixture of the two; some kind of socio-economic definition- "Parents income comes up to this level, and have more than two kids in the family."
Three post-secondary campuses promised for the Greater Toronto Area (G.T.A.). That's a great idea that would help address the problem of needed post-secondary spaces. It goes with their latest statement that a Liberal Government would decide where future campuses would go. It takes away the institution's ability to make decisions; who would know better about their own needs, than the institutions themselves? For example Laurier definitely needs a new campus- the campus at Waterloo, is tapped out for expansion.
They cover themselves when it comes to hospitals in their "Build Ontario"" document. The phrase "subject to fiscal capacity" is bandied about a lot. If they can't afford it, they won't do it. As I've increasingly blogged- that's not good enough for this community- or any other communities that have been promised hospital expansion.
Their job creation strategy leaves a lot to be desired. I understand how a $10 thousand credit for companies who hire them might benefit the economy. In theory the money is given to these companies who hire the foreign-trained workers and maybe will eventually pass on the savings to the customers, or invest in it back in their business. In reality, it's divisive and could create a really negative environment for immigrants. Speaking as a job-searcher for a moment; it's hard enough to find a job as it is for the rest of us. In my industry everyone wants experience, and yet few are willing to give you a chance at it. Imagine an engineer who gets let go after working for the same company for five years. He's got an incomparable resume; experience, management skills, sterling references. He won't get the job because he's up against a foreign-trained engineer who brings with them the $10 thousand tax credit.
What I've seen of the costing is fairly weak. Program expenditures, and interest on the debt outweigh net revenues. Even after the next four years; in t he event they a) win, and b) win with a majority the deficit will still be $7.8 billion. The full deficit won't be at 0 until 2017-2018- and that's assuming the economy continues any kind of growth.
The platform manages to mention the Progressive Conservatives, and N.DP every few pages. The Platform document isn't a place to tell me what your opponents won't do for me, it's a place to tell me what you will... I can't stand that kind of negativity.
To read the Liberal Platform for yourself click the link. Make an informed choice this provincial election.
Tuition money for middle-class families? Great idea; post-secondary schools are expensive enough. But how do you qualify "middle class?" Is it through parents' income level? Is it some kind of social definition? Or perhaps its a mixture of the two; some kind of socio-economic definition- "Parents income comes up to this level, and have more than two kids in the family."
Three post-secondary campuses promised for the Greater Toronto Area (G.T.A.). That's a great idea that would help address the problem of needed post-secondary spaces. It goes with their latest statement that a Liberal Government would decide where future campuses would go. It takes away the institution's ability to make decisions; who would know better about their own needs, than the institutions themselves? For example Laurier definitely needs a new campus- the campus at Waterloo, is tapped out for expansion.
They cover themselves when it comes to hospitals in their "Build Ontario"" document. The phrase "subject to fiscal capacity" is bandied about a lot. If they can't afford it, they won't do it. As I've increasingly blogged- that's not good enough for this community- or any other communities that have been promised hospital expansion.
Their job creation strategy leaves a lot to be desired. I understand how a $10 thousand credit for companies who hire them might benefit the economy. In theory the money is given to these companies who hire the foreign-trained workers and maybe will eventually pass on the savings to the customers, or invest in it back in their business. In reality, it's divisive and could create a really negative environment for immigrants. Speaking as a job-searcher for a moment; it's hard enough to find a job as it is for the rest of us. In my industry everyone wants experience, and yet few are willing to give you a chance at it. Imagine an engineer who gets let go after working for the same company for five years. He's got an incomparable resume; experience, management skills, sterling references. He won't get the job because he's up against a foreign-trained engineer who brings with them the $10 thousand tax credit.
What I've seen of the costing is fairly weak. Program expenditures, and interest on the debt outweigh net revenues. Even after the next four years; in t he event they a) win, and b) win with a majority the deficit will still be $7.8 billion. The full deficit won't be at 0 until 2017-2018- and that's assuming the economy continues any kind of growth.
The platform manages to mention the Progressive Conservatives, and N.DP every few pages. The Platform document isn't a place to tell me what your opponents won't do for me, it's a place to tell me what you will... I can't stand that kind of negativity.
To read the Liberal Platform for yourself click the link. Make an informed choice this provincial election.
9/11: Always Remember
The one image I can't bear to watch of that fateful September day is the one of people jumping from the two towers. I can't help but wonder about how they came to that decision; if they got a chance to hear their loved ones voices one last time?It's heart-wrenching. I think they have such resonance even now because we can all easily imagine ourselves in their place.
Today we took time out to remember those people; and all of those who died that day. And we should- it's a day that's etched in our collective memory's. We're still living with the consequences of that day; it left a gaping hole in the middle of New York, and showed us the depths of human kindness. It sent us to war, and eventually caused a significant shift in Canadian foreign policy.
All of it is worth remembering. Over 150 Canadian soldiers have died in Afghanistan since combat operations began; and each of them is worth remembering today. They fought, and managed in a way to bring some limited progress to a harsh country, half a world away and that bears remembering.
It bears remembering how Canada continued growing in the last few years. When Great Britain, and the Americans went to Iraq, we stayed in Afghanistan. This signalled a remarkable shift in attitudes; we had that habit of following the Americans and British in a lot of decisions. And now we'd make our own. Canada struck out on its own, and decided we wouldn't actively participate. We're still playing out the consequences of this decision.
It also bears thinking about how the world has changed. Somehow the world lost its innocence that day, and will never be the same. I remember being totally shocked; America- this couldn't happen to them- they're invincible- nothing could hurt them. And yet something did- I guess it goes to show none of us are invincible.
We should remember that we've had some good luck catching the bad guys before anything else has happened. A lucky flight crew caught the shoe bomber, and good police work caught the Toronto 18. The plans in both cases would've been horrific had they come to fruition; but we've caught them. I know that security can be a real pain in the behind, but remember it keeps us safe.
September 11, 2001 is truly the day the world changed. May all who died that day, and in the wars since Rest in Peace.
Today we took time out to remember those people; and all of those who died that day. And we should- it's a day that's etched in our collective memory's. We're still living with the consequences of that day; it left a gaping hole in the middle of New York, and showed us the depths of human kindness. It sent us to war, and eventually caused a significant shift in Canadian foreign policy.
All of it is worth remembering. Over 150 Canadian soldiers have died in Afghanistan since combat operations began; and each of them is worth remembering today. They fought, and managed in a way to bring some limited progress to a harsh country, half a world away and that bears remembering.
It bears remembering how Canada continued growing in the last few years. When Great Britain, and the Americans went to Iraq, we stayed in Afghanistan. This signalled a remarkable shift in attitudes; we had that habit of following the Americans and British in a lot of decisions. And now we'd make our own. Canada struck out on its own, and decided we wouldn't actively participate. We're still playing out the consequences of this decision.
It also bears thinking about how the world has changed. Somehow the world lost its innocence that day, and will never be the same. I remember being totally shocked; America- this couldn't happen to them- they're invincible- nothing could hurt them. And yet something did- I guess it goes to show none of us are invincible.
We should remember that we've had some good luck catching the bad guys before anything else has happened. A lucky flight crew caught the shoe bomber, and good police work caught the Toronto 18. The plans in both cases would've been horrific had they come to fruition; but we've caught them. I know that security can be a real pain in the behind, but remember it keeps us safe.
September 11, 2001 is truly the day the world changed. May all who died that day, and in the wars since Rest in Peace.
Thursday, September 8, 2011
Let the Games Begin
The campaign's been running all summer, and yesterday it finally officially kicked off. Who will win? How will they tackle the key issues? Both questions will be answered over the next month.
Right now I'm predicting a minority government.The Liberals on the surface are running a surprisingly strong campaign. Scratch below the surface though, and I find myself following the money; how are they going to afford it all? They're promising tuition credits for students in middle-class families, tax credits for companies hiring foreign workers, and to build or expand new hospitals as well as building 3 new campuses in the G.T.A. alone. All with a deficit sitting somewhere in the $15-20 billion range. Their positive is McGuinty himself. By mocking himself as one of the most unpopular people in the country, he's taking the sting out of it. He's coming across as natural in some of their commercials; gone is the almost wooden behavior he displays in the media.
While the Liberals are running a strong campaign, the P.C.'s are running a weaker one. That kind of surprises me because their platform does have substance, and the McGuinty government doesn't have the best record to run on. The P.C.'s message is too negative now- all summer I've been hearing about McGuinty the taxman. We all know that; we've lived through it, and still paying for it Now tell us how you plan to reverse that; a cut to the H.S.T. across the board would probably do more good for more people than the targeted elimination on some products and services. Hudak wants to eliminate the Local Health Integrated networks (L.H.I.N.), and invest the money saved form it into front-line health care. How much would that save exactly? Where specifically would invest it- would it be in building more, and expanding hospitals? Hudak has been labelled "Mike Harris Light" by the Liberals and has done nothing to get out in front,and neutralize it.
The N.D.P. is a wild card. Andrea Horwath is a clear communicator; she made no bones about wanting the job. It's quite likely she may be a king-maker in the case of a minority. She's clear about the party's beliefs, and where they stand on the issues. Such clarity could see her come up the middle between Hudak and McGuinty; while they're sniping each and either win the election or become leader of the opposition. I believe people are still looking for a change and so far she seems to capture it.
It's early in the campaign, and I don't think the latest poll showing McGuinty in the lead nearing majority territory doesn't matter much. There's a lot of a campaign to be run- mistakes to be made, and points to be won. Let the games begin.
Right now I'm predicting a minority government.The Liberals on the surface are running a surprisingly strong campaign. Scratch below the surface though, and I find myself following the money; how are they going to afford it all? They're promising tuition credits for students in middle-class families, tax credits for companies hiring foreign workers, and to build or expand new hospitals as well as building 3 new campuses in the G.T.A. alone. All with a deficit sitting somewhere in the $15-20 billion range. Their positive is McGuinty himself. By mocking himself as one of the most unpopular people in the country, he's taking the sting out of it. He's coming across as natural in some of their commercials; gone is the almost wooden behavior he displays in the media.
While the Liberals are running a strong campaign, the P.C.'s are running a weaker one. That kind of surprises me because their platform does have substance, and the McGuinty government doesn't have the best record to run on. The P.C.'s message is too negative now- all summer I've been hearing about McGuinty the taxman. We all know that; we've lived through it, and still paying for it Now tell us how you plan to reverse that; a cut to the H.S.T. across the board would probably do more good for more people than the targeted elimination on some products and services. Hudak wants to eliminate the Local Health Integrated networks (L.H.I.N.), and invest the money saved form it into front-line health care. How much would that save exactly? Where specifically would invest it- would it be in building more, and expanding hospitals? Hudak has been labelled "Mike Harris Light" by the Liberals and has done nothing to get out in front,and neutralize it.
The N.D.P. is a wild card. Andrea Horwath is a clear communicator; she made no bones about wanting the job. It's quite likely she may be a king-maker in the case of a minority. She's clear about the party's beliefs, and where they stand on the issues. Such clarity could see her come up the middle between Hudak and McGuinty; while they're sniping each and either win the election or become leader of the opposition. I believe people are still looking for a change and so far she seems to capture it.
It's early in the campaign, and I don't think the latest poll showing McGuinty in the lead nearing majority territory doesn't matter much. There's a lot of a campaign to be run- mistakes to be made, and points to be won. Let the games begin.
Friday, September 2, 2011
Ready for A Change
I've struggled for the last week trying to think of some lasting way to remember Jack Layton, and one word keeps popping into my head: Change. Change the way you behave; change the way you think about things; change your attitudes- all of it for the better. And that's what I take away from Layton's death, and his final message to Canadians.
I've been writing a couple of pieces on the provincial election and I've come to the realization that I'm ready for change; probably not in my voting preferences- but in the way this election is conducted. I'm ready for a change to a civil election campaign based on ideas. I'm ready for the P.C.'s to drop that "Taxman" Label for McGuinty, and I'm ready for the Liberals to drop the "Mike Harris" label for Tim Hudak. I'm ready for McGuinty to stand on his record, admit that yes he's messed up, but he intends to improve. And I'm ready for Mr. Hudak, and Ms. Horwath, and Mr. Schreiner, to present well-thought out alternatives to Mr. McGuinty's ideas.
I'm ready for the party leaders to knock my socks off with their visions for Ontario. The province is facing some serious challenges over the next few years; it's up to you to apply creativity to them. It's up to you to come up with new ideas. I'm ready for a government that realizes the right thing, isn't necessarily the popular thing but does it anyway. I'm ready for a government that realizes it might not have all the answers; one that works with its opposition sometimes in the name of a better Ontario.
The sad thing is I know I'm likely dreaming about all this. It's the easy way out to label someone a promise-breaker; to sling mud, and cast someone in his disliked predecessor's image. But I am hopeful, that it can change. I'm optimistic that if I write these thoughts down; other people who perhaps agree with me will read them, and maybe just maybe we can make change. Because I don't know about you, but I'm ready for it.
I've been writing a couple of pieces on the provincial election and I've come to the realization that I'm ready for change; probably not in my voting preferences- but in the way this election is conducted. I'm ready for a change to a civil election campaign based on ideas. I'm ready for the P.C.'s to drop that "Taxman" Label for McGuinty, and I'm ready for the Liberals to drop the "Mike Harris" label for Tim Hudak. I'm ready for McGuinty to stand on his record, admit that yes he's messed up, but he intends to improve. And I'm ready for Mr. Hudak, and Ms. Horwath, and Mr. Schreiner, to present well-thought out alternatives to Mr. McGuinty's ideas.
I'm ready for the party leaders to knock my socks off with their visions for Ontario. The province is facing some serious challenges over the next few years; it's up to you to apply creativity to them. It's up to you to come up with new ideas. I'm ready for a government that realizes the right thing, isn't necessarily the popular thing but does it anyway. I'm ready for a government that realizes it might not have all the answers; one that works with its opposition sometimes in the name of a better Ontario.
The sad thing is I know I'm likely dreaming about all this. It's the easy way out to label someone a promise-breaker; to sling mud, and cast someone in his disliked predecessor's image. But I am hopeful, that it can change. I'm optimistic that if I write these thoughts down; other people who perhaps agree with me will read them, and maybe just maybe we can make change. Because I don't know about you, but I'm ready for it.
Sunday, August 28, 2011
Milton gets a Hospital Expansion, or Will it?
So we've got our badly needed expansion. I know, I should be jumping for joy- so happy I should be bursting. But I'm not; instead I'm in the cynical camp on this one. I've often used the saying: Be ware of politicians making promises for it is election time. Promises are meant to be broken.
I know I'm being such a Debbie Downer. I know I'm bursting the balloons of many friends on Council, and involved with the Friends of Milton Hospital. But all I can see here are political ramifications that beg the question: Will we really get the hospital expansion?
A couple of months ago I would've predicted Ted Chudleigh had this one in the bag. On name recognition alone he'd win. Couple that with the fact he was positioning himself as a man of action on the Hospital- probably the #1 campaign issue, and I would say victory was a sure thing. Thursday's funding announcement made it an even race. Now Chudleigh gets to take partial credit and say he, along with numerous councilors, and the Friends of Milton Hospital fought hard for it, and got it done. Flip it over, Liberal candidate Indira Naidoo-Harris gets to go out and take credit saying it was a Liberal government who gave permission for it, and a Liberal government who will help fund it if re-elected. It can be viewed as vote-buying.
And I don't trust it. I think all these promises of hospital expansions are linked to polling numbers. Do a poll in any of the ridings, and I bet you'll find the Liberals running second or lower to one of the other parties prior to the announcement. Do one afterwards and you'd see a surge of support.
Right now it's great- we've got exactly what we wanted- what we've been fighting for for years. But what happens if the Liberals are re-elected and Milton gets lost in the shuffle of all the other expansions/new facilities/ and new funding? What happens if Hudak is elected and finds there's little left in the cupboards for hospitals? Will we really see an expansion at Milton Hospital?
I hope so. I don't know if there's another community more deserving- I don't know if there's another community where it's more justified. But I have to wonder if the funding announcement on Thursday was a little more opportunistic than good policy; that maybe this was more about getting elected than giving a badly-needed expansion to a community.
I know I'm being such a Debbie Downer. I know I'm bursting the balloons of many friends on Council, and involved with the Friends of Milton Hospital. But all I can see here are political ramifications that beg the question: Will we really get the hospital expansion?
A couple of months ago I would've predicted Ted Chudleigh had this one in the bag. On name recognition alone he'd win. Couple that with the fact he was positioning himself as a man of action on the Hospital- probably the #1 campaign issue, and I would say victory was a sure thing. Thursday's funding announcement made it an even race. Now Chudleigh gets to take partial credit and say he, along with numerous councilors, and the Friends of Milton Hospital fought hard for it, and got it done. Flip it over, Liberal candidate Indira Naidoo-Harris gets to go out and take credit saying it was a Liberal government who gave permission for it, and a Liberal government who will help fund it if re-elected. It can be viewed as vote-buying.
And I don't trust it. I think all these promises of hospital expansions are linked to polling numbers. Do a poll in any of the ridings, and I bet you'll find the Liberals running second or lower to one of the other parties prior to the announcement. Do one afterwards and you'd see a surge of support.
Right now it's great- we've got exactly what we wanted- what we've been fighting for for years. But what happens if the Liberals are re-elected and Milton gets lost in the shuffle of all the other expansions/new facilities/ and new funding? What happens if Hudak is elected and finds there's little left in the cupboards for hospitals? Will we really see an expansion at Milton Hospital?
I hope so. I don't know if there's another community more deserving- I don't know if there's another community where it's more justified. But I have to wonder if the funding announcement on Thursday was a little more opportunistic than good policy; that maybe this was more about getting elected than giving a badly-needed expansion to a community.
Monday, August 22, 2011
Rest In Peace Jack Layton
I've been applying for jobs with various media outlets in Ottawa. In July, when Jack Layton announced he would return in September after fighting his battle with cancer I allowed myself to imagine meeting him. I usually disagree with the N.D.P. so we would probably argue, maybe get into a heated debate. At some point he'd say something that would make me look at the world a little bit differently- maybe make me smile. And we'd part, prepared to do a similar battle all over again some other time.
Now my imagined meeting with him won't happen. Jack Layton died today at 4:45 am, and Canada at least is poorer for it. All I know of Jack I've seen or heard on television, or read in newspapers and online. I never met him, but he had a sincerity, and a strength of his convictions that transcends all media. It showed most recently in the election campaign. While Ignatieff, and Harper were busy going after each other with faked anger over a coalition, or the G.S.T., or the purchase of military jets- there was Jack Layton and the N.D.P running their election- their pace slow, and steady promoting their platform, spreading their message of change, and meeting Canadians across the country. The little party that could; the little party that did.
And their message resonated loudly with all Canadians. When Layton talked of a better Canada, and of bringing civility to Ottawa I believed him. I wanted the status quo to change- the two front runners Iggy and Harper just weren't doing it for me anymore. When election day ended the little party that could with its tireless leader became Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition- a position made more vital by having to check a Harper-led majority government.
It's one of life's tragic ironies that Mr. Layton isn't able to enjoy that massive success- that he barely tasted it before having it torn away by fate. Like everyone else I was heartbroken when I watched the press conference. The energetic man seen raising his cane in celebration was now skinny with a sallow complexion, and a voice that sounded like it belonged to a man decades older. I highly doubted then he would make his goal to return to Parliament, and yet I was rooting for him thinking Cancer had found itself a worthy adversary that would end up kicking its butt. I was sadly wrong about that.
Canada doesn't just mourn a political leader today. We mourn a good man, whose belief in himself, and passion for his country stretched beyond all boundaries. We mourn a man whose optimistic spirit, and positive message makes us believe we can build a better country and a better world. He believed Canadians could change the world, and said so in a final statement that ends with these words: My friends, love is better than anger. Hope is better than fear. Optimism is better than despair. So let us be loving, hopeful and optimistic. And we'll change the world. Now it's up to us to justify his belief.
Rest in Peace Jack... I hope we'll meet someday.
Now my imagined meeting with him won't happen. Jack Layton died today at 4:45 am, and Canada at least is poorer for it. All I know of Jack I've seen or heard on television, or read in newspapers and online. I never met him, but he had a sincerity, and a strength of his convictions that transcends all media. It showed most recently in the election campaign. While Ignatieff, and Harper were busy going after each other with faked anger over a coalition, or the G.S.T., or the purchase of military jets- there was Jack Layton and the N.D.P running their election- their pace slow, and steady promoting their platform, spreading their message of change, and meeting Canadians across the country. The little party that could; the little party that did.
And their message resonated loudly with all Canadians. When Layton talked of a better Canada, and of bringing civility to Ottawa I believed him. I wanted the status quo to change- the two front runners Iggy and Harper just weren't doing it for me anymore. When election day ended the little party that could with its tireless leader became Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition- a position made more vital by having to check a Harper-led majority government.
It's one of life's tragic ironies that Mr. Layton isn't able to enjoy that massive success- that he barely tasted it before having it torn away by fate. Like everyone else I was heartbroken when I watched the press conference. The energetic man seen raising his cane in celebration was now skinny with a sallow complexion, and a voice that sounded like it belonged to a man decades older. I highly doubted then he would make his goal to return to Parliament, and yet I was rooting for him thinking Cancer had found itself a worthy adversary that would end up kicking its butt. I was sadly wrong about that.
Canada doesn't just mourn a political leader today. We mourn a good man, whose belief in himself, and passion for his country stretched beyond all boundaries. We mourn a man whose optimistic spirit, and positive message makes us believe we can build a better country and a better world. He believed Canadians could change the world, and said so in a final statement that ends with these words: My friends, love is better than anger. Hope is better than fear. Optimism is better than despair. So let us be loving, hopeful and optimistic. And we'll change the world. Now it's up to us to justify his belief.
Rest in Peace Jack... I hope we'll meet someday.
Wednesday, August 10, 2011
While Washington fiddles, the American Economy burns
In 1997 Canada was downgraded to an AA+ rating just as the United States is right now. It took us 9 years, and our government had to make some tough decisions in order to regain the triple A status. Prime Minister Brian Mulroney introduced the much maligned Goods and Services Tax (G.S.T.), and it cost him his job in 1993. Then Liberal Finance minister Paul Martin cut transfer payments to provinces that impacted health care, and made such cuts to our military spending, and introduced tax reforms They were lean times for a while, but it had to happen. The G.S.T. is still hated now, but in hindsight it has probably has helped a lot more than it's hurt. It's created a constant stream of revenue- whether you have a job or not, you have to buy things- so you'll have to pay it.
The United States has a problem; it's not as bad as the markets would have us believe, but it is a problem. And it seems nobody is getting the message. It can't be blamed on Barack Obama- he's just the guy who happens to be in charge when it call came tumbling down. This whole mess has been decades in the making, and he shouldn't be blamed for it. Both Republican and Democratic Presidents have pushed the limit without a thought of how to pay it off; now the country is over $1 trillion in debt, with huge unemployment numbers, trying to rebound from a sub-prime mortgage crisis, and avoid yet another recession.
Obama needs to acknowledge the problem; and he has. However, he doesn't have some kind of solution (anything really). He could toughen up, and promise cuts in government spending- wage freezes for public servants- maybe tell the Army they're going to have to go without new equipment for a year. He could've told us he was going to lock his Republican counterparts and himself in a room- and they won't come out until they reach a deal. Or even, be the President who would dare to talk about tax reform, or adding some kind of consumption tax. But he didn't; and that begs the question: does he really get it how serious a problem this could be?
But he won't do any of it because the Obama Administration, is going to an election year and they have to play it safe. Just like the Republicans feel the need to attack them over everything while trying to make themselves look good. While playing politics, both parties lost touch with reality and forgot about the American people they represent. They forgot it "is" about the economy stupid. Not just the American economy, but the world economy too. The American economy is slowly burning- and the politicians are doing nothing right now to put out the flames.
The United States has a problem; it's not as bad as the markets would have us believe, but it is a problem. And it seems nobody is getting the message. It can't be blamed on Barack Obama- he's just the guy who happens to be in charge when it call came tumbling down. This whole mess has been decades in the making, and he shouldn't be blamed for it. Both Republican and Democratic Presidents have pushed the limit without a thought of how to pay it off; now the country is over $1 trillion in debt, with huge unemployment numbers, trying to rebound from a sub-prime mortgage crisis, and avoid yet another recession.
Obama needs to acknowledge the problem; and he has. However, he doesn't have some kind of solution (anything really). He could toughen up, and promise cuts in government spending- wage freezes for public servants- maybe tell the Army they're going to have to go without new equipment for a year. He could've told us he was going to lock his Republican counterparts and himself in a room- and they won't come out until they reach a deal. Or even, be the President who would dare to talk about tax reform, or adding some kind of consumption tax. But he didn't; and that begs the question: does he really get it how serious a problem this could be?
But he won't do any of it because the Obama Administration, is going to an election year and they have to play it safe. Just like the Republicans feel the need to attack them over everything while trying to make themselves look good. While playing politics, both parties lost touch with reality and forgot about the American people they represent. They forgot it "is" about the economy stupid. Not just the American economy, but the world economy too. The American economy is slowly burning- and the politicians are doing nothing right now to put out the flames.
More Shameless self promotion
Another post full of totally shameless self promotion- a link to my work with the Halton Compass, and Milton Today.
Sunday, August 7, 2011
Milton's Issues this Provincial Election
It's summer- the days are lazy, filled with heat, sunshine, pools and patios. Nobody wants to think about politics, but here we are two months out from another election and it may be time to start thinking about who to vote for. Inspired by a thread on the Hawthorne Villager, Here are What I believe to be Milton's issues?
1. Hospital Expansion: Ironically it's also the one issue the Town has little control over. As spelled out in the constitution, the Province are the ones with the power to decide how to allocate resources- including hospitals. Without a provincial government's permission the shovels won't go into the ground. The Progressive Conservative (P.C.'s) M.P.P. Ted Chudleigh has fought hard for the hospital, and will continue to do so; and his leader Tim Hudak has promised to get rid of the controversial LHINS (Local Health Integrated Networks), and use the money for front line health care
The Liberals have made hospital expansion a part of their platform, but in a vague way- and with the phrase "should fiscal capacity allow, (if they have the money)." Council continues making a convincing case based on growth any chance they get; sending copies of approvals for new subdivisions straight to the offices of Cabinet Ministers.
2. Infrastructure: There has been much talk lately of the Greater Toronto Area (G.T.A.) west corridor. This would include widening the 401 to 8-12 lanes through Milton, and adding the interchange at Tremaine Road. I'd like to see them move ahead with this project. While we're at it, how about transit? I'd love to see GO finally add full-day train service to the Milton Line. When I last asked about it, someone told me they'd put the study on it on hold, to do environmental assessment on electrifying the whole system.
3. Trust/ Accountability: Should probably have a higher ranking than third. But it is an issue. Can we trust these characters who are applying for the job of Premier? For his part McGuinty's record is rife with broken promises, and scandals: the $1 billion eHealth scandal, the O.L.G.C. scandals, the Green Energy deals, the health tax, the HST. He has admitted even if he wins, he may not hang around for another full term, and that just gives his whole campaign a completely defeatist attitude. Long-time Liberals are deserting the party among those David Caplan, and Greg Sobara are among the names not running.
Even though, I identify with the most with the P.C.'s policies, I find myself surprisingly underwhelmed by Tim Hudak. He has allowed the Liberals to define him negatively, and hasn't really done too much to stop it. I have to wonder if he'll connect well enough with voters- I've met him a few times through work, and didn't have a very flattering first impression- he looked down a lot, and seemed to make little eye contact. It's gotten better each meeting. Andrea Horwath is an unknown quantity; she comes across well, and has strong qualifications.
4. Education: Specifically the Milton Education Village (M.E.V.) Universities and colleges are expected to overflow in this part of the province. The Liberals have said they want the final decision on where satellite campuses are located. The P.C.'s want to add 6,000 new spots in post-secondary education and want the institutions to compete with each other for them. All-day kindergarten will be fully enacted in 2014-2015; something that's impossible to stop even if a possible future Premier wanted to.
These are just four of the issues I feel are facing Milton. I'm sure there are more- if you can think of any more simply leave a comment.
1. Hospital Expansion: Ironically it's also the one issue the Town has little control over. As spelled out in the constitution, the Province are the ones with the power to decide how to allocate resources- including hospitals. Without a provincial government's permission the shovels won't go into the ground. The Progressive Conservative (P.C.'s) M.P.P. Ted Chudleigh has fought hard for the hospital, and will continue to do so; and his leader Tim Hudak has promised to get rid of the controversial LHINS (Local Health Integrated Networks), and use the money for front line health care
The Liberals have made hospital expansion a part of their platform, but in a vague way- and with the phrase "should fiscal capacity allow, (if they have the money)." Council continues making a convincing case based on growth any chance they get; sending copies of approvals for new subdivisions straight to the offices of Cabinet Ministers.
2. Infrastructure: There has been much talk lately of the Greater Toronto Area (G.T.A.) west corridor. This would include widening the 401 to 8-12 lanes through Milton, and adding the interchange at Tremaine Road. I'd like to see them move ahead with this project. While we're at it, how about transit? I'd love to see GO finally add full-day train service to the Milton Line. When I last asked about it, someone told me they'd put the study on it on hold, to do environmental assessment on electrifying the whole system.
3. Trust/ Accountability: Should probably have a higher ranking than third. But it is an issue. Can we trust these characters who are applying for the job of Premier? For his part McGuinty's record is rife with broken promises, and scandals: the $1 billion eHealth scandal, the O.L.G.C. scandals, the Green Energy deals, the health tax, the HST. He has admitted even if he wins, he may not hang around for another full term, and that just gives his whole campaign a completely defeatist attitude. Long-time Liberals are deserting the party among those David Caplan, and Greg Sobara are among the names not running.
Even though, I identify with the most with the P.C.'s policies, I find myself surprisingly underwhelmed by Tim Hudak. He has allowed the Liberals to define him negatively, and hasn't really done too much to stop it. I have to wonder if he'll connect well enough with voters- I've met him a few times through work, and didn't have a very flattering first impression- he looked down a lot, and seemed to make little eye contact. It's gotten better each meeting. Andrea Horwath is an unknown quantity; she comes across well, and has strong qualifications.
4. Education: Specifically the Milton Education Village (M.E.V.) Universities and colleges are expected to overflow in this part of the province. The Liberals have said they want the final decision on where satellite campuses are located. The P.C.'s want to add 6,000 new spots in post-secondary education and want the institutions to compete with each other for them. All-day kindergarten will be fully enacted in 2014-2015; something that's impossible to stop even if a possible future Premier wanted to.
These are just four of the issues I feel are facing Milton. I'm sure there are more- if you can think of any more simply leave a comment.
Wednesday, August 3, 2011
Nycole Turmel: Federalist or Separatist?
Let's face it, before the latest the federal election few people took the New Democratic Party (N.D.P) seriously. They were the party known as Canada's Social conscience.Then the latest federal election happened. Canadians didn't like their choices, and it showed in the results. Stephen Harper won his coveted majority, but the spirit of change surrounding Jack Layton, and the N.D.P. resonated. The party went from the left-wing fringes to mainstream official opposition. When the new Members of Parliament (M.P.'s) entered the House, nobody had a clue who most were. We all knew Jack, and Olivia- some knew Peggy Nash, and Thomas Mulcair or Libby Davies and Pat Martin.
But large numbers of them are mysteries, and question marks, including Nycole Turmel. I have heard of her; she was a former leader of the federal government's largest public sector union, and some people I talk to don't have good things to say about her. Apparently she was also a member of the Bloc Quebecois for 5 years, and only resigned her membership 2 months before the federal election. Something that you'd think should exclude her from becoming interim leader.
I wonder if Jack Layton knew about her past a Separatist. If he did, it speaks to a willful ignorance, and poor judgement on his part. If he didn't know, well shouldn't the party have done its homework well before now? We're heading into month three of this government- enough time to double check the background on some of these characters. If he did know, naming her leader with her past could also be a tactic for Layton to keep some control over the party in his absence.
The formal job title is: Leader of Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition. You have to ask the question though- how loyal is it to have a woman who held membership in a federal party advocating the breakup of the country? How loyal is a federal party leader who possibly still holds membership in a provincial separatist party?
No matter how you look at it Nycole Turmel lied. In any other situation she would be asked to step aside and another named in her place. For the good of the party she should resign- this controversy is an early Christmas gift to the other three parties; and a blow to the success the N.D.P. has achieved. It's a blow to her integrity, and she won't be taken seriously by the other parties.
But we have to remember this isn't any other situation. Layton has stepped aside because of illness, and has signaled he will be back. If his absence lasts longer than the September 19, deadline I think we'll either see a second interim leader named or a date for a quick leadership convention.
But large numbers of them are mysteries, and question marks, including Nycole Turmel. I have heard of her; she was a former leader of the federal government's largest public sector union, and some people I talk to don't have good things to say about her. Apparently she was also a member of the Bloc Quebecois for 5 years, and only resigned her membership 2 months before the federal election. Something that you'd think should exclude her from becoming interim leader.
I wonder if Jack Layton knew about her past a Separatist. If he did, it speaks to a willful ignorance, and poor judgement on his part. If he didn't know, well shouldn't the party have done its homework well before now? We're heading into month three of this government- enough time to double check the background on some of these characters. If he did know, naming her leader with her past could also be a tactic for Layton to keep some control over the party in his absence.
The formal job title is: Leader of Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition. You have to ask the question though- how loyal is it to have a woman who held membership in a federal party advocating the breakup of the country? How loyal is a federal party leader who possibly still holds membership in a provincial separatist party?
No matter how you look at it Nycole Turmel lied. In any other situation she would be asked to step aside and another named in her place. For the good of the party she should resign- this controversy is an early Christmas gift to the other three parties; and a blow to the success the N.D.P. has achieved. It's a blow to her integrity, and she won't be taken seriously by the other parties.
But we have to remember this isn't any other situation. Layton has stepped aside because of illness, and has signaled he will be back. If his absence lasts longer than the September 19, deadline I think we'll either see a second interim leader named or a date for a quick leadership convention.
Friday, July 29, 2011
The Liberal Platform: "The Ontario Way"
if the Ontario Way website is it for the Liberal platform, then that party is in worse shape than I thought. The platform rests on a questionable government record (putting it kindly), and pretty much does nothing accept brag about their own achievements. They make few promises that are really comparable to the Progressive Conservatives' Changebook, unlike that document no realistic numbers or detailed plans are provided here. The party breaks the platform down to five main categories: Jobs, health, community, education, and family finances.
Under the Jobs category it states Ontario recovered 124% of jobs lost in the 2008 recession "faster than our major trading partners," with a graph featuring the United States (U.S.) and the United Kingdom (U.K.) Arguably the United States, and the United Kingdom were both worse off than the Canadian economy to begin with. The sub-prime mortgage crisis, and collapse of some financial institutions in the U.S. were contributing factors to America's recession. The United Kingdom is part of the European Union, and was likely affected by what happened in other parts of the trade zone. Couple that with the job creation caused caused in part by Canada's Economic Action plan, and the government bailout of the auto sector and is it any wonder Ontario recovered its jobs faster?
As for Health...Their website says the Liberal government hired "thousands of nurses," offered spots to more international grads than any other province, and have built 18 new hospitals. By the way in their 10-year infrastructure plan they've promised to build more hospitals, and expand others "should fiscal capacity allow," aka if they can afford it. My question is how much of this success has been borne on the backs of Ontarians through the much maligned health tax? The party also mentions eliminating coal fire generators- I'm all for it, if it can be done safely, and we have alternatives ready. In the mean time, what about looking into ways you can cleanly burn coal instead?
Under community it trumpets the government's cosmetic pesticide ban. That's a good thing for the environment and for people's overall health yes, but in 8 years is that all you've done for Ontario's communities? What about investment in community infrastructure (roads, arenas, arts centres)? Or what about keeping communities safe? I find it hard to believe a pesticide ban is the absolute best achievement you can think of for this section.
The education section announces the government's intention to completely implement the full-day Kindergarten by 2014-2015; 3-4 years away. Does this even belong on the platform for now? It's not yet completed, and there's no guarantee it will be carried over should McGuinty lose the election. I think a future government's hands are tied on this one; it's too far into the process now. And as for the estimated $6500/ year in savings to parents- how much of that goes back to the government in taxes?
Parents save $1400 on children's vaccines according to the family finances section of the platform. The provincial Liberals have offered 10% off on hydro bills in the form of an Ontario energy benefit. I'm naturally suspicious- or cynical, but I have to ask: If re-elected where will the provincial liberals make up that 10%? In new user fees? or maybe a new tax?
I hope there is more to the Liberal platform than this. The "Ontario Way" right now lacks the vision, and new ideas I'd hope to see from a party that has the significant advantage of having been in power for 8 years and is asking for a third mandate. It's as if the Liberals have given up before the campaign has really begun.
Under the Jobs category it states Ontario recovered 124% of jobs lost in the 2008 recession "faster than our major trading partners," with a graph featuring the United States (U.S.) and the United Kingdom (U.K.) Arguably the United States, and the United Kingdom were both worse off than the Canadian economy to begin with. The sub-prime mortgage crisis, and collapse of some financial institutions in the U.S. were contributing factors to America's recession. The United Kingdom is part of the European Union, and was likely affected by what happened in other parts of the trade zone. Couple that with the job creation caused caused in part by Canada's Economic Action plan, and the government bailout of the auto sector and is it any wonder Ontario recovered its jobs faster?
As for Health...Their website says the Liberal government hired "thousands of nurses," offered spots to more international grads than any other province, and have built 18 new hospitals. By the way in their 10-year infrastructure plan they've promised to build more hospitals, and expand others "should fiscal capacity allow," aka if they can afford it. My question is how much of this success has been borne on the backs of Ontarians through the much maligned health tax? The party also mentions eliminating coal fire generators- I'm all for it, if it can be done safely, and we have alternatives ready. In the mean time, what about looking into ways you can cleanly burn coal instead?
Under community it trumpets the government's cosmetic pesticide ban. That's a good thing for the environment and for people's overall health yes, but in 8 years is that all you've done for Ontario's communities? What about investment in community infrastructure (roads, arenas, arts centres)? Or what about keeping communities safe? I find it hard to believe a pesticide ban is the absolute best achievement you can think of for this section.
The education section announces the government's intention to completely implement the full-day Kindergarten by 2014-2015; 3-4 years away. Does this even belong on the platform for now? It's not yet completed, and there's no guarantee it will be carried over should McGuinty lose the election. I think a future government's hands are tied on this one; it's too far into the process now. And as for the estimated $6500/ year in savings to parents- how much of that goes back to the government in taxes?
Parents save $1400 on children's vaccines according to the family finances section of the platform. The provincial Liberals have offered 10% off on hydro bills in the form of an Ontario energy benefit. I'm naturally suspicious- or cynical, but I have to ask: If re-elected where will the provincial liberals make up that 10%? In new user fees? or maybe a new tax?
I hope there is more to the Liberal platform than this. The "Ontario Way" right now lacks the vision, and new ideas I'd hope to see from a party that has the significant advantage of having been in power for 8 years and is asking for a third mandate. It's as if the Liberals have given up before the campaign has really begun.
Thursday, July 28, 2011
Life is a highway... but it doesn't have to be
Much has been made of the idea to build a highway through the escarpment that would connect Niagara with the Greater Toronto area: Queen Elizabeth Way (QEW) with the 401. Town council voted against the idea instead deciding to back a recommendation to widen the 401 through Milton. A new highway would decrease the supply of prime farmland in this area, plus likely do environmental damage as well.
There are fears that although the Liberals have shot down the idea, if Hudak wins the October election he will go ahead with it. They may be justified- nobody can see the future. Flipping it around- if the Liberals are re-elected they may go ahead with the highway after all it is an election year. I think, coming from a farming area himself Hudak may be more understanding about it. The fact we're even talking about a new highway acknowledges in the future we could have a problem with mobility for people and goods.
Maybe what we need here, isn't necessarily a new highway. Maybe what we need is a wholesale culture makeover. A growing number of us work in jobs where we don't have to physically go to an office five days a week, or are lucky enough that thanks to technology we can work from home all the time. A number of us carpool. What if we gave tax breaks to businesses who allowed teleworking? Or what if we gave area businesses discounted transit passes?
I believe if you build it they will come- as corny as it sounds.If you build me a reliable, affordable, accessible transit system I'll be just as likely to use it as to drive the car- maybe more so depending on my destination. I see Metrolinx making slow progress in that direction; Councilor Colin Best added an amendment at Regional Council that would ask Metrolinx to accelerate their "Big Move" projects. so we're making slow progress, and I know there are plans to improve things in the future by connecting the different areas of Halton Region through transit.
I'd also make it so that any new main road more than two lanes (a Louis St. Laurent type of street), should have at least one lane either direction dedicated to public transit/ H.O.V. (carpool) traffic. Provincially make it so that any future new highway (e.g. : 400 series) should have at least one lane in either direction dedicated to transit. If the highway is 8-12 lanes in each direction, I'd increase it to a minimum of two lanes in either direction. It was a huge mistake not developing transit at the same time as we developed roads, and our communities, if we had we might not have this problem now.
As Tom Cochrane says "Life is a highway." But it doesn't have to be in Halton if we start making transit a regular part of our lives and a part of our future.
There are fears that although the Liberals have shot down the idea, if Hudak wins the October election he will go ahead with it. They may be justified- nobody can see the future. Flipping it around- if the Liberals are re-elected they may go ahead with the highway after all it is an election year. I think, coming from a farming area himself Hudak may be more understanding about it. The fact we're even talking about a new highway acknowledges in the future we could have a problem with mobility for people and goods.
Maybe what we need here, isn't necessarily a new highway. Maybe what we need is a wholesale culture makeover. A growing number of us work in jobs where we don't have to physically go to an office five days a week, or are lucky enough that thanks to technology we can work from home all the time. A number of us carpool. What if we gave tax breaks to businesses who allowed teleworking? Or what if we gave area businesses discounted transit passes?
I believe if you build it they will come- as corny as it sounds.If you build me a reliable, affordable, accessible transit system I'll be just as likely to use it as to drive the car- maybe more so depending on my destination. I see Metrolinx making slow progress in that direction; Councilor Colin Best added an amendment at Regional Council that would ask Metrolinx to accelerate their "Big Move" projects. so we're making slow progress, and I know there are plans to improve things in the future by connecting the different areas of Halton Region through transit.
I'd also make it so that any new main road more than two lanes (a Louis St. Laurent type of street), should have at least one lane either direction dedicated to public transit/ H.O.V. (carpool) traffic. Provincially make it so that any future new highway (e.g. : 400 series) should have at least one lane in either direction dedicated to transit. If the highway is 8-12 lanes in each direction, I'd increase it to a minimum of two lanes in either direction. It was a huge mistake not developing transit at the same time as we developed roads, and our communities, if we had we might not have this problem now.
As Tom Cochrane says "Life is a highway." But it doesn't have to be in Halton if we start making transit a regular part of our lives and a part of our future.
Thursday, July 21, 2011
News Of The World
There are so many aspects to this story, I don't know where to begin blogging about it. What's jumping out to me in a huge way is the accountability factor. Where were the voices in these people's heads asking the question "what if I get caught" Where were the editors saying "Where did you get those stories?" In my jobs so far I've come up with the ideas, pitched them to my boss and they okay them, or offer their feedback, even saying no sometimes.
The accountability for the phone hacking should go straight to the top. In Journalism- and generally in media your reputation is everything; and something like this could ruin reputations. With the hundreds of thousands of pounds going on in payoffs I find it hard to believe someone higher than the "managing editor didn't know about them. At the very least Rebekah Brooks knew, if not one of the Murdochs did.
Journalism is a powerful profession. Reporters are able to tell stories that matter, and shed the light onto issues of public importance. We're able to shape public opinion, and as the saying goes "speak truth to power." It's a heady responsibility, and in the case of the News of the World, people took it for granted. The buck needs to stop somewhere, not be flipped back and forth- and this one should go all the way to the top.
The accountability for the phone hacking should go straight to the top. In Journalism- and generally in media your reputation is everything; and something like this could ruin reputations. With the hundreds of thousands of pounds going on in payoffs I find it hard to believe someone higher than the "managing editor didn't know about them. At the very least Rebekah Brooks knew, if not one of the Murdochs did.
Journalism is a powerful profession. Reporters are able to tell stories that matter, and shed the light onto issues of public importance. We're able to shape public opinion, and as the saying goes "speak truth to power." It's a heady responsibility, and in the case of the News of the World, people took it for granted. The buck needs to stop somewhere, not be flipped back and forth- and this one should go all the way to the top.
Sunday, July 10, 2011
The Royal Visit
There is nothing like seeing the country through the eyes of others. I knew Canada was a place of unparalleled beauty and incredible contrasts. And now the Duke, and Duchess of Cambridge know it too. They were only here for 9 days- long enough to experience a taste of what we have to offer as a country, and re-emphasize the fact we have not only a shared history with Great Britain, but traditions and culture of our own.
They are symbols of our history as a British colony; they'll be King and Queen here one day. But in their visit to Ottawa, and taking part in a citizenship ceremony- and in the trip to Prince Edward Island (P.E.I.). served as silent acknowledgement that Canada has its own unique history, and traditions.. In P.E.I. they visited "Province House" where the fathers of Confederation negotiated the accord that brought Canada into being.
In another piece of Canadiana William played street hockey in the Northwest Territories. The only things missing from the cliche was the golden Prince scoring the winning goal on a penalty shot, and for someone to yell "car." They were white hatted- given white cowboy hats by the Mayor of Calgary. What struck me watching the tour how casual it was, and at the same time it managed to combine the history, and tradition of the British Monarchy, with the uniqueness of Canada in a recipe for an incredible memory that will be talked about across the country.
This country when seen through Catherine and William's eyes is a magnificent place full of incomparable riches (What girl doesn't want diamonds?). The incredible beauty, and resources of the Northwest Territories, to the history of Québec City, Montreal, and Prince Edward Island. The traditions of the Stampede are something unique to Alberta. We forget how amazing a country this is- it's good to be reminded every so often.
So thank you William, and Catherine for showing us what a beautiful country this is. And for reminding us of our past, while at the same time giving us a taste of the future.
They are symbols of our history as a British colony; they'll be King and Queen here one day. But in their visit to Ottawa, and taking part in a citizenship ceremony- and in the trip to Prince Edward Island (P.E.I.). served as silent acknowledgement that Canada has its own unique history, and traditions.. In P.E.I. they visited "Province House" where the fathers of Confederation negotiated the accord that brought Canada into being.
In another piece of Canadiana William played street hockey in the Northwest Territories. The only things missing from the cliche was the golden Prince scoring the winning goal on a penalty shot, and for someone to yell "car." They were white hatted- given white cowboy hats by the Mayor of Calgary. What struck me watching the tour how casual it was, and at the same time it managed to combine the history, and tradition of the British Monarchy, with the uniqueness of Canada in a recipe for an incredible memory that will be talked about across the country.
This country when seen through Catherine and William's eyes is a magnificent place full of incomparable riches (What girl doesn't want diamonds?). The incredible beauty, and resources of the Northwest Territories, to the history of Québec City, Montreal, and Prince Edward Island. The traditions of the Stampede are something unique to Alberta. We forget how amazing a country this is- it's good to be reminded every so often.
So thank you William, and Catherine for showing us what a beautiful country this is. And for reminding us of our past, while at the same time giving us a taste of the future.
Tuesday, June 28, 2011
Canada Day in Milton: Where Past meets Future
Canada Day July 1, is one of my favourite holidays. It's the one day where the chest swells with pride, and it's okay to stand up and say "I am Canadian" out loud. In Milton it's even more meaningful than just a long weekend- it's a day where the past meets the future.
The day starts off with honouring the past- a Veterans Breakfast. The Breakfast is followed by a quick wreath-laying ceremony at the cenotaph, and then a parade over to the fairgrounds. The other main event is the Citizenship ceremony at centre stage.
Last year was my first year as a member of the organizing committee; my second as the Looking out over the crowd I was reminded of how great a country this is. In the crowd sat people from all over the world; many countries less prosperous than this one. Many have fled war, and all have worked hard to at last become Canadians- to vote, be able to go to school; to do so much we take for granted. It made me appreciate the fact that I just happened to be born in Canada, and can do all that even more than I do already.
Friday July 1, is Canada Day. Come out and celebrate with the committee at the Milton Fairgrounds. See the Milton Canada Day website for a full schedule of events, and a bus schedule for the "event shuttle."
The day starts off with honouring the past- a Veterans Breakfast. The Breakfast is followed by a quick wreath-laying ceremony at the cenotaph, and then a parade over to the fairgrounds. The other main event is the Citizenship ceremony at centre stage.
Last year was my first year as a member of the organizing committee; my second as the Looking out over the crowd I was reminded of how great a country this is. In the crowd sat people from all over the world; many countries less prosperous than this one. Many have fled war, and all have worked hard to at last become Canadians- to vote, be able to go to school; to do so much we take for granted. It made me appreciate the fact that I just happened to be born in Canada, and can do all that even more than I do already.
Friday July 1, is Canada Day. Come out and celebrate with the committee at the Milton Fairgrounds. See the Milton Canada Day website for a full schedule of events, and a bus schedule for the "event shuttle."
Monday, June 27, 2011
Building What? Together
The province released its "Building Together" Plan a document that spells out the plan for infrastructure for the next 10 years. It reads like an election platform, rather than a policy document- as if someone said let's throw this one at the wall to see if it sticks. If it does, then maybe we'll get re-elected??
Most importantly for Milton there was no firm commitment for a hospital expansion. The section of the report applicable to that: Completing the 27 major hospital projects under construction, and continuing to invest in hospital expansions and redevelopment projects, subject to fiscal capacity. The plan also indicates the province will commit to 3-5 expansions/ redevelopment projects... subject to fiscal capacity- a phrase that will get them out of a lot of promises.
My understanding of the funding process is that prior to the release of the provincial government's latest budget, Milton along with other municipalities made a presentation to the province on why they deserve funding for the hospital or infrastructure project. That list was then wheedled down to 50 deserving communities, which, was supposed to be released before legislature was prorogued. This document doesn't spell out many specifics, and that not only hurts Milton, but all Ontarians.
Another disappointment to Milton: the post-secondary education portion of the plan. Recently the province decided that it should have the only say on where satellite campuses should go. Never mind the needs of an institution. Never mind the fact Laurier has land, and a willing partner in Sheridan College or the fact the town is the fastest growing in t he country, and among the youngest. the province still needs to say "yes." There are provisions in the plan for more universities and colleges, but again, as with healthcare they're vague.
It's a contradiction too. The Liberals want 407 expansion, Essex-Windsor highway- both will make it easier for commercial traffic to cross the borders. They want to add to the HOV (High Occupancy Vehicle) lanes, and build at least 500 centreline-kilometres of highway where warranted by growth and demand. What happened to the environmentally friendly Liberals? The ones that created Metrolinx, worked with the City of Toronto to change Transit City? Giving us still more ways to put more cars on the road, goes counterpoint to that doesn't it. Speaking of Transit, this is where Milton does get something: A promise of trains that are at least 12 cars. Something that should probably have happened around a decade ago.
I know this is a ten year plan, and a lot can change in a decade; subject to fiscal capacity. But where's the vision? Where's the creativity? The Progressive Conservatives have policy for families that can be clearly applied to their everyday lives. The Liberals- at least the ones who are in the provincial government right now are vague. Why not have a plan that would make that phrase "subject to fiscal capacity" a thing of the past?
This plan is unimaginative. Ontario is facing a multi-billion dollar shortfall, failing infrastructure, and an aging population. What's needed is creative ideas that will solve problems. The Liberals want to build together. Build what together? Because you're going to need to be a lot more specific than this.
Most importantly for Milton there was no firm commitment for a hospital expansion. The section of the report applicable to that: Completing the 27 major hospital projects under construction, and continuing to invest in hospital expansions and redevelopment projects, subject to fiscal capacity. The plan also indicates the province will commit to 3-5 expansions/ redevelopment projects... subject to fiscal capacity- a phrase that will get them out of a lot of promises.
My understanding of the funding process is that prior to the release of the provincial government's latest budget, Milton along with other municipalities made a presentation to the province on why they deserve funding for the hospital or infrastructure project. That list was then wheedled down to 50 deserving communities, which, was supposed to be released before legislature was prorogued. This document doesn't spell out many specifics, and that not only hurts Milton, but all Ontarians.
Another disappointment to Milton: the post-secondary education portion of the plan. Recently the province decided that it should have the only say on where satellite campuses should go. Never mind the needs of an institution. Never mind the fact Laurier has land, and a willing partner in Sheridan College or the fact the town is the fastest growing in t he country, and among the youngest. the province still needs to say "yes." There are provisions in the plan for more universities and colleges, but again, as with healthcare they're vague.
It's a contradiction too. The Liberals want 407 expansion, Essex-Windsor highway- both will make it easier for commercial traffic to cross the borders. They want to add to the HOV (High Occupancy Vehicle) lanes, and build at least 500 centreline-kilometres of highway where warranted by growth and demand. What happened to the environmentally friendly Liberals? The ones that created Metrolinx, worked with the City of Toronto to change Transit City? Giving us still more ways to put more cars on the road, goes counterpoint to that doesn't it. Speaking of Transit, this is where Milton does get something: A promise of trains that are at least 12 cars. Something that should probably have happened around a decade ago.
I know this is a ten year plan, and a lot can change in a decade; subject to fiscal capacity. But where's the vision? Where's the creativity? The Progressive Conservatives have policy for families that can be clearly applied to their everyday lives. The Liberals- at least the ones who are in the provincial government right now are vague. Why not have a plan that would make that phrase "subject to fiscal capacity" a thing of the past?
This plan is unimaginative. Ontario is facing a multi-billion dollar shortfall, failing infrastructure, and an aging population. What's needed is creative ideas that will solve problems. The Liberals want to build together. Build what together? Because you're going to need to be a lot more specific than this.
Saturday, June 25, 2011
At Last it's over!
Just after 8pm tonight- 57 hours after it began the House of Commons passed legislation that will send Postal workers back to work as soon as Monday. The parties will go to binding arbitration and be asked to present their 'best offers' to an arbitrator, and that arbitrator will decide the final contract.
The N.D.P. caused the filibuster. They objected to the legislation; specifically the raise being lower than negotiated, and to the fact it was "best offer" presentation to the arbitrator. They saw a negotiated settlement as being the only option for an outcome. And so they stalled- and every last MP got their chance to speak. In one way it was democracy in action; a party of ideals, and principles standing up for them; a rare occurrence when policies can be boiled down to an easy to remember catchphrase. In another it was insanity- saying the same thing over, and over again.
It was the binding arbitration that caused all the debate; the N.D.P. saw it as undermining the negotiating process; they were content to let the strike continue for a while and give it a chance. The government saw the possible costs to the economy- according to Minister Raitt between $9-31 million/ week, and that was enough to force action on the government's part.
The N.D.P. has always been the party of organized labour, advocating for union, and workers' right. Unions need to evolve; most sectors have half-decent working conditions, and fair wages. As the workforce ages, why not shift focus to longer-term pensions and health benefits instead of the wage increase. No matter the rules and legislation there will be unfairness in the labour world, so unions will always be needed. They just need to shift their focus.
The N.D.P. caused the filibuster. They objected to the legislation; specifically the raise being lower than negotiated, and to the fact it was "best offer" presentation to the arbitrator. They saw a negotiated settlement as being the only option for an outcome. And so they stalled- and every last MP got their chance to speak. In one way it was democracy in action; a party of ideals, and principles standing up for them; a rare occurrence when policies can be boiled down to an easy to remember catchphrase. In another it was insanity- saying the same thing over, and over again.
It was the binding arbitration that caused all the debate; the N.D.P. saw it as undermining the negotiating process; they were content to let the strike continue for a while and give it a chance. The government saw the possible costs to the economy- according to Minister Raitt between $9-31 million/ week, and that was enough to force action on the government's part.
The N.D.P. has always been the party of organized labour, advocating for union, and workers' right. Unions need to evolve; most sectors have half-decent working conditions, and fair wages. As the workforce ages, why not shift focus to longer-term pensions and health benefits instead of the wage increase. No matter the rules and legislation there will be unfairness in the labour world, so unions will always be needed. They just need to shift their focus.
Monday, June 20, 2011
What's in a Library Building?
I went last week to the information session on Bruce St. Library. I was at the afternoon session and there was a pretty decent crowd for that one I watched the presentation, which, went through the three options, and made a recommendation. Those options are: to sell it outright, lease it, or put another library branch in the building. The Consultants recommended the Town maintain ownership, and lease it to another organization, entirely ruling out the possibility of having another small branch at the Bruce St. location
On the open market the consultant estimates the buildings at 45 Bruce St, and 407 Pine St would get at least $3 million each. And that's without a bidding war- I can see that could present a huge temptation; sell off the property get the $6 million or more, use the money to service a few debts, maybe put some of it towards that hospital expansion. Leasing would create a consistent revenue stream, and put the building to good use.
I got the feeling from the presentation though, the consultants still didn't see the consequences of removing the library from the neighbourhood.. I think the Town, and consultants underestimated the success of the petition to save Bruce St, or this issue would generate such a buzz among the people. It's clear from the over 1,000 signatures there is some desire for Bruce St. as a branch library, and hopefully Council will listen and make something happen. It doesn't make sense to put an increased population in that area through intensification and then take an amenity like a library away. I'd imagine that proximity to a library would be a huge draw to move to an area and could increase the real estate values.
In the absence of more branch libraries in the west end it only makes sense to leave a branch library along Main St. With the movement of the main Library out to its Main and Thompson location, and the Beatty Branch it could appear as if the resource distribution is unfair and make people who live in the core feel like they don't matter. When Council considers the consultants' presentation, they should consider the petition, and make those people feel like they matter.
On the open market the consultant estimates the buildings at 45 Bruce St, and 407 Pine St would get at least $3 million each. And that's without a bidding war- I can see that could present a huge temptation; sell off the property get the $6 million or more, use the money to service a few debts, maybe put some of it towards that hospital expansion. Leasing would create a consistent revenue stream, and put the building to good use.
I got the feeling from the presentation though, the consultants still didn't see the consequences of removing the library from the neighbourhood.. I think the Town, and consultants underestimated the success of the petition to save Bruce St, or this issue would generate such a buzz among the people. It's clear from the over 1,000 signatures there is some desire for Bruce St. as a branch library, and hopefully Council will listen and make something happen. It doesn't make sense to put an increased population in that area through intensification and then take an amenity like a library away. I'd imagine that proximity to a library would be a huge draw to move to an area and could increase the real estate values.
In the absence of more branch libraries in the west end it only makes sense to leave a branch library along Main St. With the movement of the main Library out to its Main and Thompson location, and the Beatty Branch it could appear as if the resource distribution is unfair and make people who live in the core feel like they don't matter. When Council considers the consultants' presentation, they should consider the petition, and make those people feel like they matter.
Tuesday, June 14, 2011
New Writing Gig
I was contacted by the editor at T-Post Magazine and asked to be a contributor, and today have had my first article published. Their concept: make T-shirts out of today's news stories. Writers submit articles, and readers can vote, comment or just "like it." Every month editors select pieces from their top 10, and the winners will have their article put on a T-shirt. Writers and graphic artists get paid $1200.
So check out my article: Break from Your Cell, and vote. Keep watching the site for new articles from me.
So check out my article: Break from Your Cell, and vote. Keep watching the site for new articles from me.
Monday, June 13, 2011
Saving St. Paul's: A Step in the right direction
St. Paul's Church will be restored. In a close vote of 174-151, the congregation voted for restoration, instead of demolition. It was the right thing to do; St Paul's has been around for over a century. It is a Milton landmark; its church tower keeping watch over Main St for as long as many can remember.
But is this the end? The church faces an up-hill climb. First it has to present to the Halton Presbytery a financial plan on how to pay for the repairs; a total bill of possibly as much as $1.5 million. And then they have to raise the money; by no means an easy task. But there is enough willpower here to do it; most of us have fond memories of the place- I've said before I remember sleepovers for Girl Guides; it's seen its share of life's milestones. The last time I was there, was a Leona Boyd Concert; she, and a guitarist sat in chairs at the front of room- it was as if the audience settled in for story time or something. It was her first concert on the comeback trail. It's played a big enough role in many people's lives there is a strength of sentimentality that would fuel fundraising efforts.
174-151; a 23 vote difference. Is this a strong enough majority to back a move restore it? Or is it more reflective of an obliviously split congregation. The plan to redevelop the site, the fire, and all that it's accompanied both has caused a lot of anger and bitterness amongst the congregation. It's the Presbytery's final decision- and 23 votes may not be enough to sway them towards keeping the building. And given the time this has taken to solve it; at least the last 4 years; probably longer it's likely they're going to end to it one way or the other. Shifting the focus inside the congregation; the close vote could also indicate the faction who want it taken down has gained strength.
I'm aware the situation at St. Paul's has caused many to leave the congregation. Its possible preservation could be enough to lure people back to fight for it. It also indicates that last year when Ward #3 councillor Cindy Lunau urged them to re-think the move to demolish, some people listened. Whatever the reason, a Milton landmark, and a piece of the past is about to be saved. In my book when that happens, it's something to celebrate.
But is this the end? The church faces an up-hill climb. First it has to present to the Halton Presbytery a financial plan on how to pay for the repairs; a total bill of possibly as much as $1.5 million. And then they have to raise the money; by no means an easy task. But there is enough willpower here to do it; most of us have fond memories of the place- I've said before I remember sleepovers for Girl Guides; it's seen its share of life's milestones. The last time I was there, was a Leona Boyd Concert; she, and a guitarist sat in chairs at the front of room- it was as if the audience settled in for story time or something. It was her first concert on the comeback trail. It's played a big enough role in many people's lives there is a strength of sentimentality that would fuel fundraising efforts.
174-151; a 23 vote difference. Is this a strong enough majority to back a move restore it? Or is it more reflective of an obliviously split congregation. The plan to redevelop the site, the fire, and all that it's accompanied both has caused a lot of anger and bitterness amongst the congregation. It's the Presbytery's final decision- and 23 votes may not be enough to sway them towards keeping the building. And given the time this has taken to solve it; at least the last 4 years; probably longer it's likely they're going to end to it one way or the other. Shifting the focus inside the congregation; the close vote could also indicate the faction who want it taken down has gained strength.
I'm aware the situation at St. Paul's has caused many to leave the congregation. Its possible preservation could be enough to lure people back to fight for it. It also indicates that last year when Ward #3 councillor Cindy Lunau urged them to re-think the move to demolish, some people listened. Whatever the reason, a Milton landmark, and a piece of the past is about to be saved. In my book when that happens, it's something to celebrate.
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
The Protesting Page
It's a free country- we can do whatever we want, say whatever we want. We have the right to peacefully protest including holding up an octagonal sign saying "Stop Harper" when the man is sitting less than 10 feet away. That's what Senate Page Brigette Depape did at the Throne Speech. She was of course ushered by security out of the Senate, and promptly fired.
There is a time, and a place for that kind of thing. In this case, it was likely outside on the lawns of Parliament Hill- would that have created the stir? No probably not. But keep in mind there was a news release on the one-woman show before the speech, combine that with facebook, and other methods of social networking; she might have had something there. But instead, she disrupted what was a rather important occasion.
What I'm having trouble wrapping my mind around is why now? She worked in the senate for a year; and had four before that to protest. If she felt that strongly why did she wait until now? She was a Senate Page; someone that can bend the ear of some powerful people- why not try and talk to Majory LeBreton- the Government leader in the Senate, and a cabinet minister to boot or any one of the senators from any party. A healthy exchange of ideas never hurt anyone; she could have even changed somebody's mind about an issue and made a difference.
The other issue I have is her call for a so-called "Arab spring." She needs to put it into perspective- what many are fighting for in the Middle East, is democracy- the right to have a voice and be heard by their governments. Guess what Brigette? We already have that- it's alive and kicking; that's why you weren't thrown in jail the minute after you produced that sign asking us to "Stop Harper."
There is a time, and a place for that kind of thing. In this case, it was likely outside on the lawns of Parliament Hill- would that have created the stir? No probably not. But keep in mind there was a news release on the one-woman show before the speech, combine that with facebook, and other methods of social networking; she might have had something there. But instead, she disrupted what was a rather important occasion.
What I'm having trouble wrapping my mind around is why now? She worked in the senate for a year; and had four before that to protest. If she felt that strongly why did she wait until now? She was a Senate Page; someone that can bend the ear of some powerful people- why not try and talk to Majory LeBreton- the Government leader in the Senate, and a cabinet minister to boot or any one of the senators from any party. A healthy exchange of ideas never hurt anyone; she could have even changed somebody's mind about an issue and made a difference.
The other issue I have is her call for a so-called "Arab spring." She needs to put it into perspective- what many are fighting for in the Middle East, is democracy- the right to have a voice and be heard by their governments. Guess what Brigette? We already have that- it's alive and kicking; that's why you weren't thrown in jail the minute after you produced that sign asking us to "Stop Harper."
Saturday, June 4, 2011
To fund or not... We may not know the answer until after the election
Premier Dalton McGuinty prorogued the provincial legislature until after this October's election. He did it without a whisper of opposition, without an outcry from the public. It also happened without the release of the list of who gets what infrastructure money over the next 10 years. Milton's hopes for a hospital expansion have to wait another few months yet, and that's not right.
Milton has been fighting for its expansion for the last 15 years or more, and the need has become critical in the last five. The pressure reached a fever pitch with the Friends of Milton District Hospital postcard campaign, and most recently with the petition that got 6 thousand signatures and was presented by MPP Ted Chudleigh at Queen's Park, and the rally held at Milton's Victoria Park.
Milton was supposed to be on a list of 50 communities slated to be released this month. But that may not come out now until after the October election. I doubt we were even on it. I was able to cover the Mayor's Breakfast a while back, and the special guest was Infrastructure Minister Bob Charielli. Ted Chudleigh was seated near the front of the room to hear the Minister go after both Tim Hudak, and himself in what was an extremely partisan speech. It left me the impression that it was vaguely personal- Chudleigh had been a pain in the Liberals' backside, and they were going to do and say whatever they had to, in order to stop the P.C.'s from taking the riding again. And if that meant denying a town that so obviously needs expanded hospital facilities, then so be it... the election campaign is on- all's fair in love and elections. The hospital may be dangled like a carrot to get us voting Liberal.
An expanded hospital has become a vital need for Milton. There is no room for proper surgical waiting areas, and the infrastructure that could support the latest equipment (sterilizers) has reached the end of its useful life. In the fairly recent experiences I've had, the great staff are doing their best with what they have. But I'm sure even they grow as frustrated as various councilors are.
I think the only thing to be done is to give up. Give up fighting this government- wait until the next one is elected; because I believe it will be Progressive Conservative. Having toured the facilities, I think Hudak has a much better grasp of what Milton needs than the Premier ever would. And if he doesn't give Milton the money, then Chudleigh could become as big a pain in Hudak's rear end as he is to the Liberals.
Milton has been fighting for its expansion for the last 15 years or more, and the need has become critical in the last five. The pressure reached a fever pitch with the Friends of Milton District Hospital postcard campaign, and most recently with the petition that got 6 thousand signatures and was presented by MPP Ted Chudleigh at Queen's Park, and the rally held at Milton's Victoria Park.
Milton was supposed to be on a list of 50 communities slated to be released this month. But that may not come out now until after the October election. I doubt we were even on it. I was able to cover the Mayor's Breakfast a while back, and the special guest was Infrastructure Minister Bob Charielli. Ted Chudleigh was seated near the front of the room to hear the Minister go after both Tim Hudak, and himself in what was an extremely partisan speech. It left me the impression that it was vaguely personal- Chudleigh had been a pain in the Liberals' backside, and they were going to do and say whatever they had to, in order to stop the P.C.'s from taking the riding again. And if that meant denying a town that so obviously needs expanded hospital facilities, then so be it... the election campaign is on- all's fair in love and elections. The hospital may be dangled like a carrot to get us voting Liberal.
An expanded hospital has become a vital need for Milton. There is no room for proper surgical waiting areas, and the infrastructure that could support the latest equipment (sterilizers) has reached the end of its useful life. In the fairly recent experiences I've had, the great staff are doing their best with what they have. But I'm sure even they grow as frustrated as various councilors are.
I think the only thing to be done is to give up. Give up fighting this government- wait until the next one is elected; because I believe it will be Progressive Conservative. Having toured the facilities, I think Hudak has a much better grasp of what Milton needs than the Premier ever would. And if he doesn't give Milton the money, then Chudleigh could become as big a pain in Hudak's rear end as he is to the Liberals.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)