Over the last couple of days the McGuinty government has made a pair of announcements that will end up making them more money; an increase in license renewal fees, and the possibility of an additional casino. In principle I don't have a problem with either; licensing charges haven't gone up in 15 years- an argument could be made for a slight increase on that alone.. just not the full $8 that is forecast for this year. If delicately handled more casinos could work; however they come with their own set of problems in the form of gamboling addictions, etc. And as some point out the revenue generated by the casinos potentially takes money away from somewhere else.
I have a problem with the general concept these two represent. These two specific solutions make it look like the Province is simply making more money while trying to avoid a lot of the cuts. More money always helps especially if people have to spend it as in the case of license fees. It should probably be part of the solution it shouldn't be the only solution. If the province is going to return to prosperity then it has to be a mixture of making money and cuts. It should be an increase of say $1 to licensing fees while cutting funding to the LHIN's (or eliminating them altogether. It should be putting a Casino in while cutting or eliminating the Green Energy benefit.
The measured response has been pretty much ignored by the McGuinty government. As I cynically predicted in a previous entry they've ignored pretty much all of the Drummond Report. They've said no to charging parking fees at Go Transit lots, no to slowing the implementation of all-day kindergarten. Instead of closing a casino at Niagara Falls, they are closing slot machines at three sites (Windsor, Sarnia, and Fort Erie). The McGuinty government is also trying to negotiate a pay freeze for the elementary school teachers; if it happens it would be a significant sign they are willing to do what's necessary to balance the books.
We ontarians are generally reasonable folks who would meet the government halfway by paying slightly increased fees. The government has to meet us halfway and put together a measured response that includes cuts, as well as increases.
Showing posts with label Drummond Report. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Drummond Report. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 14, 2012
Friday, February 17, 2012
A Cynic's View Of The Drummond Report
I was filled with a general sense of hopelessness as the Drummond Report was presented on Wednesday afternoon. Implementing much of what the trusted economist recommended will take political will, and there isn't any at Queen's Park.
A public Sector wage freeze won't happen. The ship sailed on that when McGuinty promised it before, and then selectively gave a wage hike anyway. Besides one of the larger public sector Unions O.P.S.E.U (Ontario Public Service Employees Union) is soon going to be in a legal strike position, and you can probably guess what they'll be wanting...
McGuinty wants to be known as an education Premier so the likelihood of him delaying the implementation of or cancelling the full-day Kindergarten program is fairly slim. The same can be said of the cancellation of the tuition grants for post-secondary education. He's known as being friendly towards teachers too, so denying any employer rate increases to the Teacher's Pension Plan is probably out of the question as well.
McGuinty also wants to be known for his Green Energy policies. Cancelling the Green Energy Benefit probably isn't going to happen because giving people money is popular and might get votes. It also goes against his image as an environmentally friendly premier.
Nobody has the guts to talk about making seniors pay more for drugs. They're always seen as tone of the more vulnerable groups in society, which, for the most part makes sense. Besides that, Seniors vote; any attempt to make them pay more for something will be punished at the ballot box.
Gamboling makes money for the government. It probably makes enough money to make it a real revenue generator for the McGuinty Liberals, meaning guess what? Closing a casino in Niagara Falls isn't going to happen. Closing its headquarters maybe... but even that won't make much of a difference because employees will likely make their way into other jobs within the provincial government.
Could Tim Hudak do better if he were elected Premier last October? I honestly don't know. If he did win, he'd certainly be in a better position to implement the Drummond Report recommendations, because all policies affected are Liberal. It would have been natural for Hudak to stake out some different political territory and use the report as a means to do it.
McGuinty is in a no-win situation- he carries on as is and we're in a worse state in five years. He does something and he could alienate key demographics he needs to win an election. He probably ordered the Drummond Report in the first place to make it look like he was doing something. He never thought he would actually win last October. Now he's stuck trying to implement recommendations that call for him to go against many of his cornerstone policies and become unpopular. And we all know how much this Premier hates to be unpopular.
A public Sector wage freeze won't happen. The ship sailed on that when McGuinty promised it before, and then selectively gave a wage hike anyway. Besides one of the larger public sector Unions O.P.S.E.U (Ontario Public Service Employees Union) is soon going to be in a legal strike position, and you can probably guess what they'll be wanting...
McGuinty wants to be known as an education Premier so the likelihood of him delaying the implementation of or cancelling the full-day Kindergarten program is fairly slim. The same can be said of the cancellation of the tuition grants for post-secondary education. He's known as being friendly towards teachers too, so denying any employer rate increases to the Teacher's Pension Plan is probably out of the question as well.
McGuinty also wants to be known for his Green Energy policies. Cancelling the Green Energy Benefit probably isn't going to happen because giving people money is popular and might get votes. It also goes against his image as an environmentally friendly premier.
Nobody has the guts to talk about making seniors pay more for drugs. They're always seen as tone of the more vulnerable groups in society, which, for the most part makes sense. Besides that, Seniors vote; any attempt to make them pay more for something will be punished at the ballot box.
Gamboling makes money for the government. It probably makes enough money to make it a real revenue generator for the McGuinty Liberals, meaning guess what? Closing a casino in Niagara Falls isn't going to happen. Closing its headquarters maybe... but even that won't make much of a difference because employees will likely make their way into other jobs within the provincial government.
Could Tim Hudak do better if he were elected Premier last October? I honestly don't know. If he did win, he'd certainly be in a better position to implement the Drummond Report recommendations, because all policies affected are Liberal. It would have been natural for Hudak to stake out some different political territory and use the report as a means to do it.
McGuinty is in a no-win situation- he carries on as is and we're in a worse state in five years. He does something and he could alienate key demographics he needs to win an election. He probably ordered the Drummond Report in the first place to make it look like he was doing something. He never thought he would actually win last October. Now he's stuck trying to implement recommendations that call for him to go against many of his cornerstone policies and become unpopular. And we all know how much this Premier hates to be unpopular.
Labels:
Dalton McGuinty,
Drummond Report,
Tim Hudak
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)