Milton Views

Justin Trudeau: Genius or Jackass

2012-02-16T13:05:00.000-05:00

On the surface he's a genius if he runs for leader. His latest controversy has done three things. First he positions himself as a National unity figure in Quebec, and a champion of traditional "Liberal" Canadian Values to the rest of us. Second, he gets attention for his party- a hard task that usually falls to Bob Rae. It further cements the Liberals as the unofficial opposition... has anyone heard from Turmel lately? And third; it starts attacking Harper; another long-standing tactic of any political party attack the other guy instead of telling me what you will do for me.

Circumstances could still turn him into a jackass. Quebec Separatists are already spinning Trudeau's latest remarks to their advantage. A federalist, especially one with the last name of Trudeau saying under certain circumstances he would support a separate Quebec... well that's a veritable gold mine for the Parti Quebecois and Bloc Quebecois. When taken with Charest's unpopularity, it could awaken the Quebec soveriegnist movement everyone thought was dying off.

People could also wake up and realize that guess what; this Prime Minister Stephen Harper guy isn't so bad. It's been six years, and the country isn't that bad off. The thing is every time the issues of abortion, and same sex marriage come up he has refused to re-open the issue. He even quashed a private members bill on Abortion from his own party; what more does the guy have to do?

The jury is still out for me. At the moment though, I'm putting him down as a genius, but circumstances can still make him a jackass.

More Thoughts on Toronto Transit

2012-02-13T11:55:00.000-05:00

My friend and I got talking yesterday about the whole transit mess in the City of Toronto. We'd both been to London, UK and experienced the Oyster Card- think a re-loadable transit fare card that never expires. We both dream of using a similar card everywhere we go in southern Ontario- good on the T.T.C, and good on GO transit. The Presto Card is its equivalent, and transit systems are starting to adapt to that.

We both agreed Toronto fancies itself a world class city with a somewhat less than world class transit system. We would both go ahead with Rob Ford's plan to bury the Light Rapid Transit (L.R.T) lines. It is possible to pay for it with little impact on the taxpayer simply through advertising. In London for example, there are ads all over the place- on the floor, and along the walls going down to the train levels, why can't Toronto do something like that? The one thing that is arguably at a premium is advertising space.

I think Toronto has come to a sort of crossroads with the transit issue. Yes Ford still needs to find efficiencies, and save money. But on some items I think you should spend money- and transit is one of them, if we are ever to take enough cars off the road to make a difference. If he can work with Metrolinx on finding a way to do it for a decent price, why not let him?

It's a balancing act for Metrolinx too. But one thing I do wonder about is while they're busy trying to solve Toronto's transit woes, are we in the suburbs going to be stiffed? Milton for example has needed full-day Go Train service for at least the last 10 years if not longer, and so far as I know, it still hasn't happened yet... and I'm not really holding my breath on that one.

It takes vision, and healthy amount of bravery to scrap the status quo and look at doing something new. Underneath it all I believe Toronto is a world class city. Now I hope City Council is brave enough to build a transit system to make it one.

Toronto: A City of Wasted Potential?

2012-02-08T23:30:00.000-05:00

I don't live in Toronto. I rarely go to Scarborough,and when I do, it's usually by car. Logically I shouldn't have any horse in this race, but tonight I've been trying to figure out why I'm so annoyed with Toronto City Council's decision to go along with Karen Stintz's plan to build part of the Eglinton LRT (Light Rapid Transit) line above ground.

I think it's probably that even though I don't live there; I still love Toronto- it has the potential to be the world class city it wants to. And that's what I can't stand- the city has potential, and it's never been realized. Such is the case I think with Transit.

Essentially there are two options; the first- Transit City, featuring a mix of above ground light rapid transit (LRT), and underground LRT. The first option; Stintz's plan is $2 billion under budget and would look at advancing other lines than the Eglinton. She gets points for that; saving money is a huge bonus. But I think it's fairly short-sighted. It'll save money now... but in the future will it? When completed the LRT above ground will be exposed to the elements; and that Toronto weather isn't the greatest, especially in winter. One of my parents remembers looking out their office window and seeing the Scarborough Rapid Transit frozen solid between stations. They say that passengers were lowered to street levels by ladders. I just don't think the added maintenance costs even it out.

Ford's plan is to bury the LRT by building Subways. Subways are my transportation of choice while in Toronto. They will also cost a lot more to build, and inconvenience people for a lot longer while digging the tunnels. But in the long run, I think they could save a lot of money too. On his side Ford also has Metrolinx looking to do the work, for cheaper by outsourcing it. He has signed

If it were up to me I'd pick subways. Stintz is right about one thing; the city needs a solution quickly, and that could be where she's coming from with this. Transit City is established already with some limited provincial funding. but it's a short-term fix. Ford's idea of LRT subways may inconvenience people for a while. But in the long run subways are underground; they don't block traffic or freeze during the winter. Besides, subways are what Rob Ford said he was going to do; he was fairly blunt on that subject during the election. And guess what? People still voted him in, meaning Subways are what the people want. Isn't that what democracies are all about? Listen to the people... because what they want, and what's the easiest or cheapest solution isn't always the right one.

Toronto; you have potential. Now smarten up and live up to it. It's never too late to change your mind.

The Shafia Verdict: Was this the moment when It all Changed?

2012-01-30T12:28:00.002-05:00

I turned on my television to the news stations yesterday and found they had all gone on into breaking news coverage; the jury in the Shafia murder trial, had come to a verdict. I was transfixed; almost nervous with waiting for the announcement.

As I watched the coverage continue I was grasped by a growing sense of occasion. Canadians as we all know take great pride in our reputation as one of the most diverse nations on earth. I'd like to think of it as a mutually beneficial relationship; people come here to get the freedom to practice their traditions, and in return Canada adopts the best of each and ends up the better for it.

I wonder if yesterday was the moment when it all changed. In rendering a guilty verdict at the Shafia trial, Canada stood up and said; "No, this is not okay. It isn't right to take the lives of three women in the name of honour." Yesterday's guilty verdict may have been the moment where the line was drawn between practicing cultural traditions, and respecting the laws of the land.

In my opinion yesterday justice was served; a society's values were upheld. It is not okay to suppress three women who simply wanted to be like every other woman in Canada. Freedom is a cherished Canadian value, and that's what the victims wanted; the freedom to dress how they pleased, date whom they please, and speak their minds as they please. Just like me, and just like you.

Yesterday's verdict signaled to all those who practice such a horrific cultural tradition as honour killing that Canadian justice will come down hard on you. It's a message that although Canada is an open and accepting country to all who wish to make a future here; there are simply some practices that are completely unacceptable. I believe yesterday's verdict drew a line in the sand that said: "here's where our respect for your culture ends, and your respect for our laws begins."

How Do We Improve Downtown Milton?

2012-01-25T19:58:00.000-05:00

Few things beat driving down Main St. Milton and seeing the escarpment ahead of me, and tall, stately buildings to either side of me. The downtown has always had that sort of indescribable homey feeling to it. Its shops, and cafes make it a very desirable street; a draw for a many residents and tourists alike.

There is room to improve. Mill St. should feel like a part of the downtown; whether that's through something as simple as a sign saying "this way to more shops/ Restaurants," at the pass through, or finding ways to include the street in festivals and events. Maybe find a way to make it physically part of the downtown; maybe making another little Square or something near Delacourts in a portion of the parking lots behind.

I'd love to see more variety in terms of shops. Right now Main St, is full of pubs, restuarants, and coffee shops. I'm a huge fan of all of those- especially coffee shops; I'd love to see more shops. I'd use this as an opportunity to get small businesses that offer really funky, trendy stuff- clothing boutiques with designs you wouldn't see anywhere else. Look for places that make people say when asked: "I got that in Downtown Milton, and there's only one store that carries it." A good example ofthis would be Locke St in Hamilton; there's such an easy-going vibe there. And it has a mixture of everything from coffee shops, and bakeries to jewellery stores.

Pick one day outside of the Market a month and make it a car-free day. It would be great for people just to wander up and down Main St, and get a sense of the shops down there. It may even build some community spirit; one of the things Milton is known for.

I would definitely look for ways to incorporate the Arts Centre somehow. It's supposed to be a centrepiece for those entering Milton, let's use it as one. It'd be a great opportunity for restaurants along Main St to offer vouchers for a discount on their meals if they show their tickets (or reciepts).

For me, Downtown Milton has always been vibrant, and friendly; and there has to be a way to keep it that way. We just have to work on it.

Crown-First Nations Gathering

2012-01-25T14:51:00.000-05:00

Yesterday,The First Nations People met with members of the government, including the Prime Minister, and Governor General in what was known as the Crown-First Nations Gathering or #CFNG as it was known on Twitter.

The day started out with speeches from both the Prime Minister and First Nations Assembly Grand Chief Shawn Atleo. I watched both speeches, and they felt like two parties at the start of a negotiation. The Prime Minister said they wouldn't repeal the Indian Act, but would find creative ways to work around it. The Grand Chief called the Indian Act an obstacle to prosperity; recalling images of a boulder on the highway.

At this point, it's safe to say everyone agrees the Indian Act has been doing more harm than good. In an ideal world, it would be gone, no matter what had to happen. In hindsight the Indian Act was an ignorant piece of legislation that paved the way for disastrous programs like the Residential schools, and in some ways the Reserve system itself. It broke the trust between the First Nations, and Europeans- a trust that is only in the early stages of being repaired.

But this isn't an ideal world. It's a lot messier than that, and the Prime Minister acknowledged that reality, when he referred to the Indian Act as a tree with deep roots that goes back through history. This legislation has behind it over 140 years (1876) of history, and traditions behind it. Breaking that is going to prove a huge challenge. And I don't think you can ignore it; I think they should at least acknowledge .

Not to mention what would happen to the amendments since that legislation was passed, including the Charter of Rights and Freedoms which enshrined what rights granted to Natives under the Indian Act. I would imagine the constitution would likely have to be reopened, or amended to allow for the changes. At this point realistically repealing the Indian Act wouldn't work unless there was some kind of framework that could potentially replace it.

Harper's so-called "creative ideas" could turn into finding ways to help First Nations to form more partnerships such as those he described in his speech. Or it could be something like working with First Nations to reform the Reserve system; making sure all who live on Reserves enjoys the same living conditions as those who live off of them.

The tree that is the Indian Act can't be cut down yet. The thing about trees is they occasionally need pruning, and reshaping to allow for new growth; and that takes creativity and skill. It may take a while, but I think the Indian Act will in the long term will be repealed. I just think it's going take a lot of creativity and hard work before that can happen; and it may be a generation from now or more until it does.

Free Advice for the Liberal Party

2012-01-14T15:39:00.000-05:00

In a shocking result, the federal Liberals went from Canada's second Party to Canada's third Party. Their stature took a huge hit, and left them asking the question of how to regain their former glory? How do they regain that former second party status?I think I have some free advice if you will from someone who just wants a third choice when we go to the polls in the next federal election.

My first is to redefine yourselves as the ideas party. What made the party work under Chretien was that you had the ideas to make Canada better, and the financial resources thanks to Paul Martin to make that happen. Become that party again; combine bold ideas and the finances that made them possible. If you've got the ideas; if you've got the substance then anyone can lead the party.

My second idea is about who could make it happen. I think Shelia Copps would make a great President. From everything I read/see/ and hear of her in the media, I think she's got the spine to make the necessary changes, and really crack the whip so to speak. She could also help interim leader Bob Rae get some attention for the party; something that's hard with the Liberals at its third-party ranking.

And as for the leadership; I'd close the door on Bob Rae running. Rae was Ontario's former Premier in the early '90'sbest known for "Rae Days-" which were days Public Sector Workers (nurses, teachers, and doctors) took off without pay. Many still remember what conditions were like under his Premiership, and I think were he to take the permanent leadership of the federal Liberal Party, Ontario would be dead to the Liberals for the duration. And one thing all political parties know is that you need Ontario and its 100+ electoral seats to have any chance at winning a federal election.

If not Rae, then who?
I would go for a complete unknown quantity. Someone younger that could energize the party, and reach out, and engage Canadian youth. I'd pick someone who is unattached to either Chretien or Paul Martin; someone who is unafraid to break some of the well established traditions and make their own. It should be someone who maybe has their own ideas, and their own way of doing things. An ambitious job description? Yes, but if the party wants to succeed and perhaps win the next federal election.

This has been some free advice for the Liberals; take it for what it's worth. Wanted, or notI have plenty more where this comes from, so stay tuned.

.

The Velodrome Part #2: Has the Province Done Its Homework?

2012-01-04T00:14:00.000-05:00

"What do Mississauga, Vaughn, and Hamilton know that we don't? Or what do we in Milton know that the others don't?"

A friend of mine asked me these questions as we waited for a Special Council Meeting to begin on the Velodrome. We didn't know the answers then, but they're starting to come out now. Last week Paul Henderson- Olympic Sailor, and lobbyist for Toronto's failed 1996 Olympic Bid, came out with a warning that he thought the Games would come in over budget. He is now among critics who think the Games' budget could come out over its $1.4 billion budget.

Milton has definitely done its homework on this project. My guess is Town Staff has checked the numbers many times trying to figure how this would work without impacting the tax base. And it likely will work with the support of Mattamy and their private partners. But just because Milton has done its homework, and due diligence in having a project that won't impact the tax base, doesn't mean other levels of government have done theirs.

And perhaps that's what Mississauga, Vaughn, and Hamilton know that we don't. Maybe they've realized that a certain provincial government having trouble balancing its books, hasn't. Maybe the other municipalities have realized the province has failed to take into account the need for extra public transit between venues, or venues that have been moved, or roads that need to be built/ closed down for transporting the athletes. And they want no part of it; who can blame them? Usually when the Province errs, it's the municipality that ends up paying the price.

I'm still in favour of the velodrome. I support it as an idea that would turn the spotlight on Milton in a positive way. But when someone like Paul Henderson with his credibility says the Games could turn out to be over budget maybe we should pause and listen. Maybe it's time to question the Province on its finances for the Games; How are we going to pay for the additional transit? (Milton still only has rush hour Go service), Are you going to be able to afford the needed university campus? and if so will it be "shovel-ready" by 2015. What about the cost to provincial roads? Has that been taken into account?

Henderson's comments on the Pan Am games make me wonder if the Province has done its homework on its portion of the budget. I think the time has come for someone to ask.

Rob Ford & The Toronto Star

2011-12-01T16:38:00.001-05:00

There's something refreshing about a politician who picks their stance on an issue, and sticks to it. That's what Rob Ford continues to do with Toronto Star. The newspaper printed a 2010 story about Ford and a possible physical confrontation with a high-school football player over a bad performance on the field. It even says witnesses interviewed even disagree on what actually happened that day. The story was proven wrong by the Globe & Mail, and the Star hasn't apologized for their error.

And the newspaper is supposedly paying the price. Ford has cut off all access to himself and will not grant them an interview until they apologize for the story. According to the Star as well, they have allegedly not been getting the news releases on the Mayor's appearances and schedule from his office. Being a journalist, this should be a space where I rant on about the freedom of the press to say whatever we want. But frankly on this one I agree with Mayor Ford.

I agree with Ford because as a Journalist I'm well aware that my professional reputation rests on my stories, and the facts contained in them. If I'm unable to confirm a fact or figure; or in this case someone's eye witness account it doesn't go into the story, period. If I publish something that has been clearly proven wrong such as this has been by the Globe & Mail, then I would have no problem admitting I'm wrong. It might stink having to swallow my pride but I'd admit it, and apologize.

The Star's claims that it hasn't been receiving press releases and media advisories from Mayor Ford's office rings completely bogus to me. The Toronto Star is one of Canada's leading daily newspapers, you can't tell me their journalists don't have their "anonymous sources" in the Mayor's Office, or one or two councillors who might happen to be at the same events as Mr. Ford that are talking to the newspaper or willing to share their schedules.

I haven't been at this media business very long, but I have realized two things especially when it comes to politicians; it's about relationships, and access. You have to have one to get the other; if your relationship sours with someone then it's pretty much game over on the access side of things.

This whole story seems to be a self-made one for the Star designed to try and sell newspapers and it leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Today's installment was a transcript of an interview Mr. Ford gave to Am640's John Oakley about his apparent "boycott" of the paper. Ford said he encourages people to read the Globe & Mail, and the Sun instead of the Star. He also told a story about how they had a party for his newly departed Press Secretary for council, and the media but the Toronto Star were the only ones who didn't show up.

That was the newspaper's choice; and they shouldn't complain about being excluded. It's time the Star either stayed quiet and take the consequences of its actions- and maybe someday when the Mayor is in a kinder mood have its access restored. Or they could just buck up, admit they were wrong, and apologize.

Milton's Velodrome Quest

2011-11-28T17:34:00.001-05:00

I've been following the Velodrome saga for a while. I did some reporting for Hamilton's Open File website, and in following affairs in the steel city, watched parts of a committee meeting on their attempts to nail down city funding for the project. As we all know by now Hamilton city council failed to approve the required money. As the saying goes; whenever one door closes, another opens.

When Milton was first talking about bidding for it I was skeptical. I was convinced the Toronto bid team were just playing municipalities off against each other in an effort to get what they wanted from Hamilton. In reading the report, I'm here today to say it looks like I was wrong. Milton is serious about this, and has gotten some serious money on the table from top private donors; I've been told there are some in town who see this as a money making opportunity. If it can be done with minimal impact to the tax base, then more power to them

The more I keep reading about it, the more I'm excited about it. Among the suggested sites for it is the likely future Milton Education Village out at the corner of Tremaine Rd, and Derry. And it's got Wilfrid Laurier University's full backing. The University realizes the potential uses of the velodrome as a multi-use facility to live on well after the Games. Should the velodrome go ahead, it will mean the certain approval for Wilfrid Laurier to begin work on its Milton Campus; a major change for this community.

Should Milton be successful it would put us on the map, as not just the town southwest of Toronto. Instead it would become the cycling capital of Canada, and a headquarters to the Ontario Cycling Association. The association looks upon this as a legacy that might not occur again in Canada's most populated area for decades. And indeed, this is a chance of a lifetime, and it's taken guts to after it. That's something I applaud Council for; it's been a while since an idea from any level of government has caught my imagination. But a caution; for every one person such as myself, there are others who are a little bit more cynical, and see the weaknesses in it.

However despite the positive vibes, and energy coming from Milton on this it I don't think it's over. Hamilton could be gearing up for a fight; Councilor McHattie would like to see the City continue its quest for the velodrome. According to the motion seen here, he feels the city could raise an additional $5 million through the sale of lands in the West Harbour area of the city. It hasn't yet been before council, and in reading the blog, there's no guarantee it will be, but the idea is there Milton could be in for a fight, but it's winnable.

A Sympathetic Ear

2011-11-18T17:41:00.001-05:00

A good cup of coffee was always worth the wait; it's a policy that has found me standing in line for many a cold morning. This morning at the Athenian was no different as I stood huddled in my coat just inside the front door. The lineup was moving quickly; before I knew it, I was inside, undoing my zipper against the warmth.

I looked around; the place was packed; all the easy chairs, couches, and tables taken, and the place abuzz with conversation. Only one seat remained at a table in a darkened corner, and even that had an occupant; Odysseus, the mysterious hero newly back from his years of travel. I stepped up ordering my coffee; the barrista followed my gaze;
"He comes here everyday, and sits staring sightlessly out the window for hours."
"What does he take in his coffee? I ask. If I was going to have to sit with him, I may as well bring him something The server poured his to order, and I balanced them both making my way to the table.

"Is this seat taken?" I ask to be nice. He motioned to the chair;
"By all means, take it" I set his coffee in front of him, and busied myself settling in. I shrugged out of my coat, draping it over the back of the chair. My gloves I shoved in the coat sleeves with my hat. I nervously ran a hand through my hair. At last I was ready to begin drinking my coffee. I gingerly sipped at first, savouring the fragrant aroma, and the smooth taste. As I did so I contemplated my table mate; He just sat there; staring sightlessly his facial expression blank. On a closer look his face was lightly scarred under one eye- I wondered briefly how he got that. After a few minutes he let out a sigh so full of frustration, and sadness that it invited conversation.

"I know exactly how you feel," my one sentence brought him out of his daze. His gaze switched to me expectantly. He picked up the coffee I brought him, and sipped it. I continued:

"Life can be frustrating sometimes- like hitting your head repeatedly against a brick wall without a helmet. Take me for instance. It feels like I've been searching for a job for most of my adult life- certainly as long you've been away.

"I started off working in retail; a clerk at a video store. That job was the most fun; I got paid to watch movies, talk about movies. Who wouldn't want to do that?" That got a response from him:

"I'd love a job like that."

"I know. That lasted two years, and helped me pay for a year at Sheridan doing their New Media Journalism program. I loved every minute of it; it was exactly what I wanted to do with my life. I remember we had to do an internship, and I did mine at a radio station, overnight in Toronto."

"That must have been exciting," he commented.

"It wasn't really. Toronto can be surprisingly dull during the overnight hours, which, is odd considering the amount of murders, etc. you hear about in the media. The best part of that was watching the morning show come in, and set up; it was like watching a well-oiled machine. I learned a lot form that, and it gave me a taste for radio. I'd love to work at a radio station someday."

"Oh." He sipped the coffee again, and made me think he was lapsing into silence. He swallowed;

"Continue."

"After Sheridan, I volunteered at my local cable station. That lasted a few months; and got me doing some on-camera and voice over work. It led me to my first paying gig as print reporter. I couldn't believe my luck! I was paid to do what I love for a living. I made the front pages frequently- one time even occupying it fully." I sipped my coffee, letting him take those achievements in.

"Your family must have been thrilled to see your name in print."

"They were. My grandmother even kept all of my clippings." I thought of the pile on a shelf in my home office; I should really do something with those; put them in a binder or portfolio or something.

"And then..." He prompted me.

"I worked at that for a year, and decided to begin looking elsewhere. And I found it, funny enough through that job. There was this crew wearing black T-shirts around with cameras taping everything, so I grabbed a business card and before I knew it I was working for them writing their magazine. The company opened a television station and I was in charge of scheduling the studio time, news crew shoots, and producing as well as writing the news."

"That must have been a lot of work,"

"It was. But it was fun and I worked with some amazing people; we made a great time. We did some really cool stuff."

"I'm sure you did. A career in television... wow. I couldn't do it."

"Yes you could. You're handsome enough, trust me." He smiled;

"Thank you for the compliment. You speak of it in the past tense what happened..."

"It closed up a while back. It was a start-up company, there were money issues. It sucked; because that job was the closest I'd gotten to a full-time job."

"I see. That's tough luck. What have you done since?" He showed genuine interest for the first time in our conversation. I sipped coffee for a moment.

"I'm back to freelancing again; this time for an online news organization. And now it looks like that's closing too." I drained the cup, and sat back.

"Actually now I've come to think of it; every place I've worked now closed."

"You sound as cursed by bad luck as I was in my travels," he commented.

"I prefer to think of it as simply there was only really one of me. And they couldn't survive after I left, so they closed. It helps my ego." We laughed at my joke.

"I see. He drained his cup;

"Where have you been applying to so far?"

"Here and there. Do you know I've sent at least a dozen resumes into the CBC since June and I haven't heard a thing back? You'd think somebody would get the hint already."

He shrugged his shoulders;"You may hear back. Government runs on its own time lines."

"True. CTV on the other hand has called me back. Two months after I applied for a job in Regina they called asking me for links to reports I'd done, and photos. of me So I am getting somewhere."

"It seems like it. It also seems like you've got the right attitude. Apply for anything, anywhere and you never know where life will take you."

"Well that's the general plan anyway. After all I've got nothing to lose right?"

"Exactly. That was my attitude- and I ended up seeing the world." He drained his coffee and rose;

"Well, I should get going. I have to be at work."

"It was good talking to you- I had fun. Maybe next time you can talk about your troubles. There's gotta be a few stories there."

He shrugged: "It was good talking to you too. We all need a sympathetic ear every so often." I watched him leave. The server came over to her table;

"That was the most animated I've seen him weeks. What did you do?"

I smiled: "I told him a story. He listened; it worked for both of us." The server poured me another coffee;

"It's on the house. You've done a good deed. I can't get him to say two words to me."

"Thanks." I stayed for a few more minutes sipping it gently before leaving myself.

Frank Klees as Speaker: Genius or Jackass move?

2011-10-26T13:03:00.001-04:00

Frank Klees has been many things in his public life- a cabinet minister under Mike Harris, an opposition critic under Tim Hudak, and a leadership hopeful finishing second twice. And now it looks like he could be the Speaker of the Provincial Legislature; a position vital to the government's survival in the context of a minority government.

On the surface Klees' candidacy could be viewed as a betrayal to his party. It cripples the opposition by taking the seat away, and helps the Liberals quest to govern as a majority. The Speaker's role is to be neutral and keep order in the house- usually voting with the government in matters of confidence. And here's where the genius part comes in. While it is accepted convention to vote with the government, there is nothing that says Klees should he win the role must do so. He could potentially use the role to put the Liberals' feet to the fire on some of their promises. He could use the position to force compromises, and potentially accomplish something for his party.

Or it could be a totally jackass move, that will blow up in his face. The fact is his candidacy is viewed by some in his party as a betrayal. It makes Tim Hudak look a bit of a fool- a few days after saying nobody in his party has any interest in the position, Klees announces he does have interest. It's a huge gamble for him; the Speaker becomes a powerful job in a minority Parliament-the arguable perception is he gave up the collective good- a combined opposition force with a majority of the power for his own self-interest. This does nothing to make any friends in any party. If he loses, he goes back to his own party, and although he'll likely be welcomed back into the fold I'd imagine there'll be no love lost.

I wonder if Mr Klees has thought this one out. Should he win the position, he'll have to strike a delicate balance between party loyalty, and plunging the province into yet another election. Taking his seat out of the equation we'd be sitting with a statistical dead heat; it makes me wonder if this new/old provincial government would get anything done at all. We may be in for a very short mandate- or a very long one stuck in the muddy world of party politics.

This either is a genius move should he win; The P.C.'s could learn to live with it using him to their advantage in that role. Or it's a totally jackass move that portrays him in an unflattering light as the typical politician who places self-interest above all else including party loyalty. At this point it could go either way.

Occupy Toronto

2011-10-22T12:17:00.000-04:00

I've been struggling with what to say about it for the last week And it all comes down to the fact that I get it. As corny as it sounds- I am the 99%. I'm 29 years old, with a Bachelor of Arts Degree in History and Contemporary Studies (2004), and a post-graduate certificate in New Media Journalism (2008). I live at home with my parents, and am carrying around a $5 thousand debt. I'm living at home because despite my best efforts, I have been unable to find a full-time job- the best I've been able to do is freelance positions.

Part of it is the field I've chosen; journalism is a really hard one to break into. And I've never expected it to be easy but I've decided to be persistent and stay the course... my hard work has in some measure been rewarded. Another is the economy; there was a period of time where media organizations were laying off, as I was applying for jobs. The job market is still poor no matter what field you're in.

Another part of it is that despite whatever factors that may have led to my current circumstances; there is a problem. I know of quite a few people in a similar situation to mine; those educated in a given field who want to make a living at it, and yet can't find jobs. So they're stuck either working at part-time jobs, or unemployed and at home. And if the younger section of society is having this difficult a time finding a job then it is probably time to start asking the tough questions about how it went this far.

Honestly as I've been thinking about this as it applies to my own situation I've found it's all about mindset, and perspective . The job searching process can be incredibly frustrating; I felt like I've been knocking my head against the brick wall on some days. But I've tried to remain positive and remember that every position I've had has been a step forward. And I've had the chance to cover amazing stories- the St. Paul's Church Fire, interview political candidates; met cabinet ministers, and talked to passionate people with interesting tales to tell. I've also through those positions, and interviews made some great friends. And I've been lucky too that while I have money coming in through my freelance position, I know there are others who don't have that.

As my seemingly endless search for a permanent job continues I have wondered if this... whatever this undefinable thing is more of a symptom of a societal shift rather than a cause for protest. Technology has made our lives easier; it's made our jobs easier. People can work from home; jobs can be done online. My generation has been told for a while that we'll have more than one career in our lives. Maybe what we're turning into is perhaps a society where thanks to technology we can have more than one career happening at once.

It could be governments are slow to respond, because they like the rest of us know there's something that's off- they just can't define it yet. And how do you solve a problem you can't define? The only thing to do is to wait and see what develops then change to respond.

We have to remember that we are in Canada phenomenally lucky to have survived the worst of the economic downturn. We're lucky that while the US, and EU are struggling, we're generally still pretty prosperous in the grand scheme of things. Despite this though, there is obviously something undefinable happening here. We just have to wait and see what happens, then respond.

Lisa Raitt vs. Air Canada Round 4

2011-10-13T20:59:00.000-04:00

As corny, and cliched as this sounds I can see both sides on this one. On the one hand, there's a solid economic argument here for making the flight attendants an essential service. A strike could potentially ground hundreds of flights angering thousands of passengers who won't re-book with Air Canada.. ever. This could cost the airline a fair bit of money. And how much would it cost businesses who despite technology still need to meet with their employees face-to-face? Like it or not Air Canada is the only truly national airline and if it flight attendants went out on strike it could at the very least strike a crippling blow to the economy. It is the only "Canadian" airline to fly to Europe, and I think it's safe to say Asia.

On the other hand the funny thing about capitalism is the fittest survive. If Air Canada flight attendants were to strike it would significantly weaken the airline, but it would also create opportunity for the others. Air Canada serves a few destinations domestically that the other airlines don't. In its absence I have to believe the smaller airlines like WestJet, and Porter would grow to meet the demand for those destinations as well as the international ones. Air Canada would soon be deflated, and may never regain the customers it would lose.. going with this logic; let them go on strike, and would kill the airline. But thanks to supply and demand, more may rise.

You can never get everything you want in a negotiation. I've heard it mentioned in media reports the flight attendants got at least 80% of what they wanted; in my estimation that's fairly decent. After all, you can't please everyone all the time. If you give people time; everyone will complain about their jobs- Air Canada flight attendants are no different. Yes, there are disgruntled passengers and I'm sure it's a pain in the butt sometimes. Overall, from where I sit, it seems a pretty amazing job; you get paid to travel! How many of us wouldn't give our eye-teeth to do that? I definitely would.

In an ideal world when a company does well it passes the wealth around. The union would have us believe that didn't happen- the higher executives took bonuses, and ignored the workers. If that's what happened, then isn't this a bit of misguided anger? Shouldn't the flight attendants be angry at the Air Canada executives instead of the government?

Unions are here to stay. But now when the economy is so uncertain shouldn't they bend just a little bit? Maybe we should take this moment as a sign that just as the general public have to evolve in their jobs, unions should do the same.

CUPE protests in front of Lisa Raitt's riding office

2011-10-13T15:06:00.001-04:00

Just back from a protest by CUPE(Canadian Union of Public Employees) in front of Lisa Raitt's office over the ongoing dispute with Air Canada. Below are some photos, and raw video. Warning: some video is a little shaky; understand I'm not a professional camera person.


Protesters gather in front of Labour Minister Lisa Raitt's Office


One of many protest signs


Bringing out the heavyweights: Sid Ryan is interviewed

Video of chanting protesters... remember what I said about the camerawork.

Will have more on this later.

A Very Canadian Result

2011-10-12T12:38:00.001-04:00

If anyone lost it was oddly enough Dalton McGuinty. He lost 18 seats to his opposition; 11 to the P.C.'s, and 7 to the N.D.P. He ended up one torturous seat short of a majority government. What makes it a Canadian result is the fact Andrea Horwath- the third place party ended up the most powerful, squarely in the position of being the balance of power.

This means the Liberals don't make a move now without either the P.C.'s or the N.D.P. on side with them. I hope everyone sees the wisdom in this. The fact is McGuinty needed a slap on the wrist- and the electorate gave it to him. After having near total power for 8 years the knowledge you have to work with your opponents might be more humbling than a loss. With the lower voter turnout it could be said we voted en masse with our feet.

The results are by no means a ringing endorsement for McGuinty. If anything they're a passive aggressive way of saying we want a change, but the choices we have before us aren't that great. So we'll stick with the guy we had before. It's as if we've put him on notice- we're wising up to your tricks, and your lies. We're putting him in a two-year penalty box, if he minds his manners we may let him back on the ice.
..
The opposition as well has a tough road ahead of them. How they oppose will say a lot for the government's stability. They have to act as a government-in-waiting, and offer alternatives, instead of just going against the McGuinty government for the sake of opposing them. Hudak, and Horwath each have to act as future Premier.

The new government could mean a lot for Milton. Right before the writ dropped, it was announced the Liberals would fund the expansion for Milton Hospital. A minority government could mean the Liberals actually keep that promise. The man tasked with making sure that happens is Ted Chudleigh- returned by the voters in Halton for another term. It could also make Milton Education Village a reality a lot sooner than anyone can hope for.

I don't know how long this will last- but the average life of a minority parliament is 18 months. It's not starting off well- N.D.P. leader Horwath has requested a meeting with McGuinty and Hudak- McGuinty has said no. If McGuinty acts the tiniest bit humble there's nothing to say this can't last four years. However long it lasts, it should be entertaining.

How Will It end?

2011-10-05T12:01:00.002-04:00

I'm not going to make a prediction- instead I'm going to make a best guess. We will wake up Friday morning to a Progressive Conservative (P.C.) minority government. I started the campaign with this opinion, and nothing has happened to change it much.

The P.C.'s and Liberal platforms are fairly equal. On the Liberal side, if you scratch below the surface- and take a good look at what the ideas are, you'll find them wanting. on the P.C. side there is some more substance. Both are vague in different areas; the Liberals on how they plan to pay for new hospitals, and the P.C.'s on how their platform would benefit cities.

The two parties are matched with mistakes. McGuinty made one with an ill-timed jobs platform and Hudak in the way he responded to it. McGuinty made another one, when he cancelled the power plant in Mississauga; something that is clearly politically motivated. Hudak made one when he released the sex-ed pamphlet with homophobic content. Everyone hates the HST, and nobody will do anything to if not get rid of it outright or at the very least trim the provincial portion. Nobody has taken McGuinty on about Caledonia.

In the end, a government of any stripe has to stand on its record. As unfair as it may seem for McGuinty this means the full eight years. And for all his successes in health care and education; his attempts to get Ontario to buy into Green energy, it's the scandals and broken promises people will remember. In two previous elections he said he wouldn't raise taxes- we now have the health premium and the HST- which even though it could be good for business; sucks for the consumer. Nobody likes paying more.

Hudak isn't perfect. He's hasn't run the best election campaign. He's spent a more time telling us what the NDP, and Liberals won't do for us and not enough telling what a P.C. government would do for us. Even after one year of campaigning, we really don't know him that well; and that's why Ontario voters will only give him a minority.

Andrea Horwath will end up the kingmaker, and I suspect do very well with that role. Her party has run a campaign based on clearly expressed ideas. They've stuck with the positive message of voting for hope, and not fear; and that will ring true with some voters. Bob Rae casts a long shadow over his former party; and there will be those who will remember what it was like when Ontario last had an N.D.P. Premier. That could be enough to keep her from the Premier's chair.

Eight years is a long time for a government to last in power. It's time for change; Hudak is the best placed to deliver that change. Let's give Hudak a chance.

Embrace the Conservative Hat Trick

2011-09-29T12:23:00.000-04:00

Premier Dalton McGuinty is bringing up the idea of a Conservative Hat Trick. That's a Conservative majority in Ottawa under Harper, a P.C. government at Queen's Park, and a P.C. in the Mayor's seat in Toronto. I don't really find that too scary.

Harper for his part has been a steady hand on the tiller for the economy. We started off not knowing what he was like on a personal level and gave him a minority government; and then slow but steady increased the minority. The N.D.P. is strong enough to stand up to his majority; they've already done it when they filibustered the postal-workers back to work legislation. Even though it's a transitional period as they prepare to choose a new leader I think they'll still find ways to make their message heard.

Toronto Voters chose Rob Ford last October; and they need him. David Miller says he left a $350 million surplus, but so far there are no signs of it. Surplus or not, the city is still in a pretty big hole and something has to give.   The cuts will be painful, but if the result is a more prosperous Ontario capital, then isn't it worth it? Toronto voters also chose more federal Conservatives to represent them in Ottawa showing that fear of Conservatives in Toronto might be on the decline.

I don't find anything scary about a possible "Premier Hudak." Polls show a minority with Andrea Horwath in a king-maker role.   I think she'd be a strong enough influence at Queen's Park. Polls show a minority mostly because even after months of campaigning we still don't know Tim Hudak that well. Why couldn't we treat Hudak, the same way we treated Harper? Give him a minority for a while, and see what he can do

The whole idea of a "Conservative hat trick" seems more a reaction of a Premier desperate to hold on. His platform is in tatters, and all he has left is a record in which the scandals outweigh the successes. Fear is basically the last tactic open to him.   Well I say, embrace the fear- let's give Hudak a try. If we find electing him wasn't the best idea we ever had we can always switch it up in a year or so.

Leaders Debate Analyisis

2011-09-28T13:06:00.000-04:00

I think Andrea Horwath won the leaders debate last night. She got her policy out the clearest, and seemed at times refreshingly blunt on issues such as health care. She also got in a few good lines; most notably: "Isn't that guy your leader now?" referring to Bob Rae as leader of the federal Liberal Party. Rae I think still casts a long shadow over the Ontario NDP for some voters, and it was important for her to put some distance between them, and she did that using humour.

I wonder where the Tim Hudak shown to us last night was a month ago? He was clear, and more confident on his policies than he ever has been to-date. If he was like that a month ago, this election would be a walk in the park for him. He had the oft-quoted line "Nobody trusts you anymore Mr. McGuinty." I think that's going to turn into a ballot question, and really resonates with voters. Because the fact is- few people do trust him anymore.

The Dalton McGuinty I watched last night was at times tentative. The hand gestures were sometimes stiff, and at others elaborate, and defensive. It's natural to use hand gestures at times to use for all of us- when we're excited or just to illustrate a point. But in McGuinty's case it came across as nervous and defensive. And it was distracting from what he was saying. I wondered if he was trying to flag down Steve Paikin for the cheque or something... maybe reflecting on a past career as a rap artist nobody knows about??

In terms of substance McGuinty was weak. Where the others managed to answer the question, and get in their policy, McGuinty made a habit of answering the question he wished had been asked. The debate was full of issues it seemed he didn't want to talk about. Green Energy- the gas-fired plant he cancelled over the weekend, and the Samsung deal. Jobs: the contentious plan to give 10 thousand to companies who hire foreign workers. The Economy? How to get rid of the $14-16 billion deficit he's racked up. Taxes- the introduction of the HST, and the past broken promises on that subject. He seemed to fall back on his record, which, is so laden with broken promises and scandal it blots out anything he's achieved on the positive side like reducing surgical wait times, and expanding the use of the Primecare Family Health teams.

I don't think this debate makes much difference in terms of voting preferences. But it did crystallise where the parties stand on the issues, and helped differentiate Hudak from McGuinty a little bit more. It made Horwath a legitimate third option, and cemented this election as a three-way contest come October 6, 2011. It's going to be a wild finish.

Why don't they talk about...

2011-09-25T23:56:00.005-04:00

With less than two weeks to go before we enter the voting booth, there are still some things that haven't been talked about this campaign. Here are what I think some of them are:

1. Caledonia: It's still a stalemate over five years later. Hudak, and Horwath could really hammer McGuinty on this one. In my opinion- McGuinty failed in his duty to protect his people. History has a bad habit of repeating itself; fear of a repeat of what happened at Ipperwash probably caused the inaction. It goes to leadership; you see a problem and solve it.

2. The Self-employed: Surveys have shown that although unemployment is growing, so too are the self-employed. The federal government has responded to this, extending maternity/paternity benefits, as well as some health benefits to them. All provincial parties aren't looking at this, and it should be discussed.

3. Affordable Housing: Someone in a recent interview I did pointed out that even though many parts of the province have the same issues, they look different. Homelessness for example looks different in Grimsby than it does in Toronto or even Milton. For example it costs around $700/ month in Grimsby to rent an apartment- expensive; especially when you're a homeless youth with limited job prospects. Even the acknowledgement there is a problem, and it can't be solved with one blanket solution would be a step in the right direction.

4. The "Single" Person: Believe me, I understand the focus on family. It's the core of society- we all start off members of a family. But here's the thing; we all grow up and become fine upstanding tax-paying citizens. Some marry, and have kids of their own. Some choose to remain single. And yet despite all this the "Single person is being ignored. Elections can come down to single vote victories, so remember the single person.

These are just four issues not being discussed. If there's an issue you feel strongly our leaders should tackle, then feel free to leave a comment. Who knows? maybe with a little over week to go, maybe a couple of them will get attention.

Progressive Conservative Platform: A detailed critique

2011-09-20T11:37:00.001-04:00

The Progressive Conservatives platform is very oriented around the pocketbook- consistent with some of their core fiscal beliefs you would traditionally associate with the Conservatives. They make several promises around cutting income taxes by 5% on the first $70 thousand per family; putting an estimated $258 into the pocket of a family of four. Who wouldn't want extra money back from the government? But I find myself repeating my criticism of earlier this year: What about the single person? What about the families earning less than $70 thousand; there are a few of those around you know.

Add this one up with the fact HST would be eliminated from hydro bills under a Hudak government and you've got some serious savings. I'm a huge fan of tax breaks- especially when it benefits me. And I can see the logic- give people more of their money back; and they'll spend more, which, will increase the economy and likely produce jobs. But what if this economy remains in its current "iffy" status? Always on the edge of another recession, but not quite prosperous either. This might cause people to pocket the additional savings, and that could freeze the consumer side of the economy.

There is some debate as to whether Hudak can legally exit the Samsung deal; he might have to let that one slide. It's not readily obvious in the platform what the P.C.'s would do in its place. What I would do, is to make it easier for companies dedicated to Green energy a bit of a tax break- developing that kind of technology could be expensive. I'd look for a way to make it a bit more affordable for the consumer as well.

It becomes obvious that Ontario will need more post-secondary spots. The P.C.'s like their Liberal counterparts have plans for 60 thousand new post-secondary spots over the next four years. Their plan is to have schools compete for them- Will there be some kind of criteria the schools have to meet? If so, then what? Will it be in the form of new campuses as the Liberals have promised, or based on program, scattered across the province? Sub question to this; a fair number of high school students around age 17 find themselves heading back to school for what's termed a "victory lap." How do you guys plan to deal with this trend?

The P.C.'s are proposing to give more of a say to municipalities. They seem to be the only party dealing with this particular issue; and it's something definitely pertinent to Milton. The only thing I can see on there is they would end the provincial tinkering with the official plans. What does "increased say" mean? Does it mean municipalities can say "no" to developers and for a change have it actually mean "no? Taking Milton for example again- does it mean municipalities have a bit of a say as to what can go on development charges- like say a hospital?

The Justice side of things is a little thin. Making inmates work on so-called "chain gangs" and the sex registry are both good ideas. But they also seem like populist ideas; things that can be done easier if Hudak is elected to a majority government. What about ways to clear the backlog of the court system? Or looking at tougher sentencing for provincial crimes?

They're planning to eliminate the L.H.I.N.S (Local Health Integration Network), and invest the money in front-line health care. Great- there is no need of an extra layer of bureaucracy that really doesn't help health care much. But how do you do define front line health care- hiring more nurses and doctors? Maybe building and expanding more hospitals? Or implementing more of the Prime-care Family health teams? Or maybe on.. dare I say it, electronic health records? There's lots of ways to spend that money.

Potentially this platform could find the P.C.'s on the government side of the house come October 6. But some of these ideas need a little more thought put into them for it to be fully workable. To read more check out the issues section of their website.

The N.D. P. Platform critique

2011-09-20T00:46:00.001-04:00

The N.D.P. have always had great ideas. But when you ask how much it would cost... that's when it falls apart. This platform is no exception. They have the most realistic approach to the HST; they'd scrap it on home heating oils, and gas for cars- two places where it would save people the most. But the revenue has to be replaced somewhere.

Setting weekly gas prices is in theory a good idea. Nobody else has even tried to solve this problem, and it seems the instant there's an increase on the markets, within hours there's an increase at our local gas stations. There has to be something we can do. But the question I have here is: how do you manage the market increases?

Becoming equal partners in transit development with municipalities is a good idea as well. It is pretty much our collective faults for not developing our transit as we built our roads- this kind of spreads the burden of solving the problem. Where the weakness with their transit plan is in the freeze on fares for four years. Again- a good idea; who doesn't want to pay less for something? The problem is what happens when/ if you take the freeze off? After four years the increase could be a huge deciding factor in whether some people continue to use transit. A better idea might be to somehow tie the increase to the rate of inflation maybe.

The education plank is fairly non-existent. The N.D.P. is looking at tuition freezes, and forgiving the interest on student loans. Both good ideas, but it fails to address the system as a whole. The P.C.'s and Liberals both have grand plans of funding 60 thousand post-secondary spots.

Buying Ontario may be a great soundbite but in practical terms won't work. The provinces are too interdependent on each other. And Ontario is still a powerful part of the overall Canadian economy- Ontarians start buying exclusively Ontario, and the rest of Canada might fail.

Scrapping the LHIN's (Local Health Integrated Network), is something the N.D.P. and their P.C. counterparts agree on. The money saved here (I think around $200 million) would probably offset some of the fees on medical exams, and ambulance fees they plan on getting rid of.

These are some decent ideas there, but is it enough to form a government on? It might be. The N.D.P. have so far been fairly clear on what they will do if elected, and the clarity might be enough to break through the clatter of the other two fighting it out on the negative end of things.

Liberal Platform Critique

2011-09-12T12:38:00.000-04:00

I've read the Liberal platform. It flushes out the ideas on their website The Ontario Way," and adds some new ones. For me it comes down to money; there's some pretty good ideas in there. But how do you afford them?

Tuition money for middle-class families? Great idea; post-secondary schools are expensive enough. But how do you qualify "middle class?" Is it through parents' income level? Is it some kind of social definition? Or perhaps its a mixture of the two; some kind of socio-economic definition- "Parents income comes up to this level, and have more than two kids in the family."

Three post-secondary campuses promised for the Greater Toronto Area (G.T.A.). That's a great idea that would help address the problem of needed post-secondary spaces. It goes with their latest statement that a Liberal Government would decide where future campuses would go. It takes away the institution's ability to make decisions; who would know better about their own needs, than the institutions themselves? For example Laurier definitely needs a new campus- the campus at Waterloo, is tapped out for expansion.

They cover themselves when it comes to hospitals in their "Build Ontario"" document. The phrase "subject to fiscal capacity" is bandied about a lot. If they can't afford it, they won't do it. As I've increasingly blogged- that's not good enough for this community- or any other communities that have been promised hospital expansion.

Their job creation strategy leaves a lot to be desired. I understand how a $10 thousand credit for companies who hire them might benefit the economy. In theory the money is given to these companies who hire the foreign-trained workers and maybe will eventually pass on the savings to the customers, or invest in it back in their business. In reality, it's divisive and could create a really negative environment for immigrants. Speaking as a job-searcher for a moment; it's hard enough to find a job as it is for the rest of us. In my industry everyone wants experience, and yet few are willing to give you a chance at it. Imagine an engineer who gets let go after working for the same company for five years. He's got an incomparable resume; experience, management skills, sterling references. He won't get the job because he's up against a foreign-trained engineer who brings with them the $10 thousand tax credit.

What I've seen of the costing is fairly weak. Program expenditures, and interest on the debt outweigh net revenues. Even after the next four years; in t he event they a) win, and b) win with a majority the deficit will still be $7.8 billion. The full deficit won't be at 0 until 2017-2018- and that's assuming the economy continues any kind of growth.

The platform manages to mention the Progressive Conservatives, and N.DP every few pages. The Platform document isn't a place to tell me what your opponents won't do for me, it's a place to tell me what you will... I can't stand that kind of negativity.

To read the Liberal Platform for yourself click the link. Make an informed choice this provincial election.

9/11: Always Remember

2011-09-12T00:34:00.000-04:00

The one image I can't bear to watch of that fateful September day is the one of people jumping from the two towers. I can't help but wonder about how they came to that decision; if they got a chance to hear their loved ones voices one last time?It's heart-wrenching. I think they have such resonance even now because we can all easily imagine ourselves in their place.

Today we took time out to remember those people; and all of those who died that day. And we should- it's a day that's etched in our collective memory's. We're still living with the consequences of that day; it left a gaping hole in the middle of New York, and showed us the depths of human kindness. It sent us to war, and eventually caused a significant shift in Canadian foreign policy.

All of it is worth remembering. Over 150 Canadian soldiers have died in Afghanistan since combat operations began; and each of them is worth remembering today. They fought, and managed in a way to bring some limited progress to a harsh country, half a world away and that bears remembering.

It bears remembering how Canada continued growing in the last few years. When Great Britain, and the Americans went to Iraq, we stayed in Afghanistan. This signalled a remarkable shift in attitudes; we had that habit of following the Americans and British in a lot of decisions. And now we'd make our own. Canada struck out on its own, and decided we wouldn't actively participate. We're still playing out the consequences of this decision.

It also bears thinking about how the world has changed. Somehow the world lost its innocence that day, and will never be the same. I remember being totally shocked; America- this couldn't happen to them- they're invincible- nothing could hurt them. And yet something did- I guess it goes to show none of us are invincible.

We should remember that we've had some good luck catching the bad guys before anything else has happened. A lucky flight crew caught the shoe bomber, and good police work caught the Toronto 18. The plans in both cases would've been horrific had they come to fruition; but we've caught them. I know that security can be a real pain in the behind, but remember it keeps us safe.

September 11, 2001 is truly the day the world changed. May all who died that day, and in the wars since Rest in Peace.

Let the Games Begin

2011-09-08T20:03:00.000-04:00

The campaign's been running all summer, and yesterday it finally officially kicked off. Who will win? How will they tackle the key issues? Both questions will be answered over the next month.

Right now I'm predicting a minority government.The Liberals on the surface are running a surprisingly strong campaign. Scratch below the surface though, and I find myself following the money; how are they going to afford it all? They're promising tuition credits for students in middle-class families, tax credits for companies hiring foreign workers, and to build or expand new hospitals as well as building 3 new campuses in the G.T.A. alone. All with a deficit sitting somewhere in the $15-20 billion range. Their positive is McGuinty himself. By mocking himself as one of the most unpopular people in the country, he's taking the sting out of it. He's coming across as natural in some of their commercials; gone is the almost wooden behavior he displays in the media.

While the Liberals are running a strong campaign, the P.C.'s are running a weaker one. That kind of surprises me because their platform does have substance, and the McGuinty government doesn't have the best record to run on. The P.C.'s message is too negative now- all summer I've been hearing about McGuinty the taxman. We all know that; we've lived through it, and still paying for it Now tell us how you plan to reverse that; a cut to the H.S.T. across the board would probably do more good for more people than the targeted elimination on some products and services. Hudak wants to eliminate the Local Health Integrated networks (L.H.I.N.), and invest the money saved form it into front-line health care. How much would that save exactly? Where specifically would invest it- would it be in building more, and expanding hospitals? Hudak has been labelled "Mike Harris Light" by the Liberals and has done nothing to get out in front,and neutralize it.

The N.D.P. is a wild card. Andrea Horwath is a clear communicator; she made no bones about wanting the job. It's quite likely she may be a king-maker in the case of a minority. She's clear about the party's beliefs, and where they stand on the issues. Such clarity could see her come up the middle between Hudak and McGuinty; while they're sniping each and either win the election or become leader of the opposition. I believe people are still looking for a change and so far she seems to capture it.

It's early in the campaign, and I don't think the latest poll showing McGuinty in the lead nearing majority territory doesn't matter much. There's a lot of a campaign to be run- mistakes to be made, and points to be won. Let the games begin.

Ready for A Change

2011-09-02T13:20:00.000-04:00

I've struggled for the last week trying to think of some lasting way to remember Jack Layton, and one word keeps popping into my head: Change. Change the way you behave; change the way you think about things; change your attitudes- all of it for the better. And that's what I take away from Layton's death, and his final message to Canadians.

I've been writing a couple of pieces on the provincial election and I've come to the realization that I'm ready for change; probably not in my voting preferences- but in the way this election is conducted. I'm ready for a change to a civil election campaign based on ideas. I'm ready for the P.C.'s to drop that "Taxman" Label for McGuinty, and I'm ready for the Liberals to drop the "Mike Harris" label for Tim Hudak. I'm ready for McGuinty to stand on his record, admit that yes he's messed up, but he intends to improve. And I'm ready for Mr. Hudak, and Ms. Horwath, and Mr. Schreiner, to present well-thought out alternatives to Mr. McGuinty's ideas.

I'm ready for the party leaders to knock my socks off with their visions for Ontario. The province is facing some serious challenges over the next few years; it's up to you to apply creativity to them. It's up to you to come up with new ideas. I'm ready for a government that realizes the right thing, isn't necessarily the popular thing but does it anyway. I'm ready for a government that realizes it might not have all the answers; one that works with its opposition sometimes in the name of a better Ontario.

The sad thing is I know I'm likely dreaming about all this. It's the easy way out to label someone a promise-breaker; to sling mud, and cast someone in his disliked predecessor's image. But I am hopeful, that it can change. I'm optimistic that if I write these thoughts down; other people who perhaps agree with me will read them, and maybe just maybe we can make change. Because I don't know about you, but I'm ready for it.

Milton gets a Hospital Expansion, or Will it?

2011-08-28T20:55:00.001-04:00

So we've got our badly needed expansion. I know, I should be jumping for joy- so happy I should be bursting. But I'm not; instead I'm in the cynical camp on this one. I've often used the saying: Be ware of politicians making promises for it is election time. Promises are meant to be broken.

I know I'm being such a Debbie Downer. I know I'm bursting the balloons of many friends on Council, and involved with the Friends of Milton Hospital. But all I can see here are political ramifications that beg the question: Will we really get the hospital expansion?

A couple of months ago I would've predicted Ted Chudleigh had this one in the bag. On name recognition alone he'd win. Couple that with the fact he was positioning himself as a man of action on the Hospital- probably the #1 campaign issue, and I would say victory was a sure thing. Thursday's funding announcement made it an even race. Now Chudleigh gets to take partial credit and say he, along with numerous councilors, and the Friends of Milton Hospital fought hard for it, and got it done. Flip it over, Liberal candidate Indira Naidoo-Harris gets to go out and take credit saying it was a Liberal government who gave permission for it, and a Liberal government who will help fund it if re-elected. It can be viewed as vote-buying.
And I don't trust it. I think all these promises of hospital expansions are linked to polling numbers. Do a poll in any of the ridings, and I bet you'll find the Liberals running second or lower to one of the other parties prior to the announcement. Do one afterwards and you'd see a surge of support.

Right now it's great- we've got exactly what we wanted- what we've been fighting for for years. But what happens if the Liberals are re-elected and Milton gets lost in the shuffle of all the other expansions/new facilities/ and new funding? What happens if Hudak is elected and finds there's little left in the cupboards for hospitals? Will we really see an expansion at Milton Hospital?

I hope so. I don't know if there's another community more deserving- I don't know if there's another community where it's more justified. But I have to wonder if the funding announcement on Thursday was a little more opportunistic than good policy; that maybe this was more about getting elected than giving a badly-needed expansion to a community.

Rest In Peace Jack Layton

2011-08-22T14:36:00.001-04:00

I've been applying for jobs with various media outlets in Ottawa. In July, when Jack Layton announced he would return in September after fighting his battle with cancer I allowed myself to imagine meeting him. I usually disagree with the N.D.P. so we would probably argue, maybe get into a heated debate. At some point he'd say something that would make me look at the world a little bit differently- maybe make me smile. And we'd part, prepared to do a similar battle all over again some other time.

Now my imagined meeting with him won't happen. Jack Layton died today at 4:45 am, and Canada at least is poorer for it. All I know of Jack I've seen or heard on television, or read in newspapers and online. I never met him, but he had a sincerity, and a strength of his convictions that transcends all media. It showed most recently in the election campaign. While Ignatieff, and Harper were busy going after each other with faked anger over a coalition, or the G.S.T., or the purchase of military jets- there was Jack Layton and the N.D.P running their election- their pace slow, and steady promoting their platform, spreading their message of change, and meeting Canadians across the country. The little party that could; the little party that did.

And their message resonated loudly with all Canadians. When Layton talked of a better Canada, and of bringing civility to Ottawa I believed him. I wanted the status quo to change- the two front runners Iggy and Harper just weren't doing it for me anymore. When election day ended the little party that could with its tireless leader became Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition- a position made more vital by having to check a Harper-led majority government.

It's one of life's tragic ironies that Mr. Layton isn't able to enjoy that massive success- that he barely tasted it before having it torn away by fate. Like everyone else I was heartbroken when I watched the press conference. The energetic man seen raising his cane in celebration was now skinny with a sallow complexion, and a voice that sounded like it belonged to a man decades older. I highly doubted then he would make his goal to return to Parliament, and yet I was rooting for him thinking Cancer had found itself a worthy adversary that would end up kicking its butt. I was sadly wrong about that.

Canada doesn't just mourn a political leader today. We mourn a good man, whose belief in himself, and passion for his country stretched beyond all boundaries. We mourn a man whose optimistic spirit, and positive message makes us believe we can build a better country and a better world. He believed Canadians could change the world, and said so in a final statement that ends with these words: My friends, love is better than anger. Hope is better than fear. Optimism is better than despair. So let us be loving, hopeful and optimistic. And we'll change the world. Now it's up to us to justify his belief.

Rest in Peace Jack... I hope we'll meet someday.

While Washington fiddles, the American Economy burns

2011-08-10T23:20:00.000-04:00

In 1997 Canada was downgraded to an AA+ rating just as the United States is right now. It took us 9 years, and our government had to make some tough decisions in order to regain the triple A status. Prime Minister Brian Mulroney introduced the much maligned Goods and Services Tax (G.S.T.), and it cost him his job in 1993. Then Liberal Finance minister Paul Martin cut transfer payments to provinces that impacted health care, and made such cuts to our military spending, and introduced tax reforms They were lean times for a while, but it had to happen. The G.S.T. is still hated now, but in hindsight it has probably has helped a lot more than it's hurt. It's created a constant stream of revenue- whether you have a job or not, you have to buy things- so you'll have to pay it.

The United States has a problem; it's not as bad as the markets would have us believe, but it is a problem. And it seems nobody is getting the message. It can't be blamed on Barack Obama- he's just the guy who happens to be in charge when it call came tumbling down. This whole mess has been decades in the making, and he shouldn't be blamed for it. Both Republican and Democratic Presidents have pushed the limit without a thought of how to pay it off; now the country is over $1 trillion in debt, with huge unemployment numbers, trying to rebound from a sub-prime mortgage crisis, and avoid yet another recession.

Obama needs to acknowledge the problem; and he has. However, he doesn't have some kind of solution (anything really). He could toughen up, and promise cuts in government spending- wage freezes for public servants- maybe tell the Army they're going to have to go without new equipment for a year. He could've told us he was going to lock his Republican counterparts and himself in a room- and they won't come out until they reach a deal. Or even, be the President who would dare to talk about tax reform, or adding some kind of consumption tax. But he didn't; and that begs the question: does he really get it how serious a problem this could be?

But he won't do any of it because the Obama Administration, is going to an election year and they have to play it safe. Just like the Republicans feel the need to attack them over everything while trying to make themselves look good. While playing politics, both parties lost touch with reality and forgot about the American people they represent. They forgot it "is" about the economy stupid. Not just the American economy, but the world economy too. The American economy is slowly burning- and the politicians are doing nothing right now to put out the flames.

More Shameless self promotion

2011-08-10T10:04:00.000-04:00

Another post full of totally shameless self promotion- a link to my work with the Halton Compass, and Milton Today.

Milton's Issues this Provincial Election

2011-08-07T21:33:00.001-04:00

It's summer- the days are lazy, filled with heat, sunshine, pools and patios. Nobody wants to think about politics, but here we are two months out from another election and it may be time to start thinking about who to vote for. Inspired by a thread on the Hawthorne Villager, Here are What I believe to be Milton's issues?

1. Hospital Expansion: Ironically it's also the one issue the Town has little control over. As spelled out in the constitution, the Province are the ones with the power to decide how to allocate resources- including hospitals. Without a provincial government's permission the shovels won't go into the ground. The Progressive Conservative (P.C.'s) M.P.P. Ted Chudleigh has fought hard for the hospital, and will continue to do so; and his leader Tim Hudak has promised to get rid of the controversial LHINS (Local Health Integrated Networks), and use the money for front line health care

The Liberals have made hospital expansion a part of their platform, but in a vague way- and with the phrase "should fiscal capacity allow, (if they have the money)." Council continues making a convincing case based on growth any chance they get; sending copies of approvals for new subdivisions straight to the offices of Cabinet Ministers.

2. Infrastructure: There has been much talk lately of the Greater Toronto Area (G.T.A.) west corridor. This would include widening the 401 to 8-12 lanes through Milton, and adding the interchange at Tremaine Road. I'd like to see them move ahead with this project. While we're at it, how about transit? I'd love to see GO finally add full-day train service to the Milton Line. When I last asked about it, someone told me they'd put the study on it on hold, to do environmental assessment on electrifying the whole system.

3. Trust/ Accountability: Should probably have a higher ranking than third. But it is an issue. Can we trust these characters who are applying for the job of Premier? For his part McGuinty's record is rife with broken promises, and scandals: the $1 billion eHealth scandal, the O.L.G.C. scandals, the Green Energy deals, the health tax, the HST. He has admitted even if he wins, he may not hang around for another full term, and that just gives his whole campaign a completely defeatist attitude. Long-time Liberals are deserting the party among those David Caplan, and Greg Sobara are among the names not running.

Even though, I identify with the most with the P.C.'s policies, I find myself surprisingly underwhelmed by Tim Hudak. He has allowed the Liberals to define him negatively, and hasn't really done too much to stop it. I have to wonder if he'll connect well enough with voters- I've met him a few times through work, and didn't have a very flattering first impression- he looked down a lot, and seemed to make little eye contact. It's gotten better each meeting. Andrea Horwath is an unknown quantity; she comes across well, and has strong qualifications.

4. Education: Specifically the Milton Education Village (M.E.V.) Universities and colleges are expected to overflow in this part of the province. The Liberals have said they want the final decision on where satellite campuses are located. The P.C.'s want to add 6,000 new spots in post-secondary education and want the institutions to compete with each other for them. All-day kindergarten will be fully enacted in 2014-2015; something that's impossible to stop even if a possible future Premier wanted to.

These are just four of the issues I feel are facing Milton. I'm sure there are more- if you can think of any more simply leave a comment.

Nycole Turmel: Federalist or Separatist?

2011-08-03T15:18:00.000-04:00

Let's face it, before the latest the federal election few people took the New Democratic Party (N.D.P) seriously. They were the party known as Canada's Social conscience.Then the latest federal election happened. Canadians didn't like their choices, and it showed in the results. Stephen Harper won his coveted majority, but the spirit of change surrounding Jack Layton, and the N.D.P. resonated. The party went from the left-wing fringes to mainstream official opposition. When the new Members of Parliament (M.P.'s) entered the House, nobody had a clue who most were. We all knew Jack, and Olivia- some knew Peggy Nash, and Thomas Mulcair or Libby Davies and Pat Martin.

But large numbers of them are mysteries, and question marks, including Nycole Turmel. I have heard of her; she was a former leader of the federal government's largest public sector union, and some people I talk to don't have good things to say about her. Apparently she was also a member of the Bloc Quebecois for 5 years, and only resigned her membership 2 months before the federal election. Something that you'd think should exclude her from becoming interim leader.

I wonder if Jack Layton knew about her past a Separatist. If he did, it speaks to a willful ignorance, and poor judgement on his part. If he didn't know, well shouldn't the party have done its homework well before now? We're heading into month three of this government- enough time to double check the background on some of these characters. If he did know, naming her leader with her past could also be a tactic for Layton to keep some control over the party in his absence.

The formal job title is: Leader of Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition. You have to ask the question though- how loyal is it to have a woman who held membership in a federal party advocating the breakup of the country? How loyal is a federal party leader who possibly still holds membership in a provincial separatist party?

No matter how you look at it Nycole Turmel lied. In any other situation she would be asked to step aside and another named in her place. For the good of the party she should resign- this controversy is an early Christmas gift to the other three parties; and a blow to the success the N.D.P. has achieved. It's a blow to her integrity, and she won't be taken seriously by the other parties.

But we have to remember this isn't any other situation. Layton has stepped aside because of illness, and has signaled he will be back. If his absence lasts longer than the September 19, deadline I think we'll either see a second interim leader named or a date for a quick leadership convention.

The Liberal Platform: "The Ontario Way"

2011-07-29T11:41:00.001-04:00

if the Ontario Way website is it for the Liberal platform, then that party is in worse shape than I thought. The platform rests on a questionable government record (putting it kindly), and pretty much does nothing accept brag about their own achievements. They make few promises that are really comparable to the Progressive Conservatives' Changebook, unlike that document no realistic numbers or detailed plans are provided here. The party breaks the platform down to five main categories: Jobs, health, community, education, and family finances.

Under the Jobs category it states Ontario recovered 124% of jobs lost in the 2008 recession "faster than our major trading partners," with a graph featuring the United States (U.S.) and the United Kingdom (U.K.) Arguably the United States, and the United Kingdom were both worse off than the Canadian economy to begin with. The sub-prime mortgage crisis, and collapse of some financial institutions in the U.S. were contributing factors to America's recession. The United Kingdom is part of the European Union, and was likely affected by what happened in other parts of the trade zone. Couple that with the job creation caused caused in part by Canada's Economic Action plan, and the government bailout of the auto sector and is it any wonder Ontario recovered its jobs faster?

As for Health...Their website says the Liberal government hired "thousands of nurses," offered spots to more international grads than any other province, and have built 18 new hospitals. By the way in their 10-year infrastructure plan they've promised to build more hospitals, and expand others "should fiscal capacity allow," aka if they can afford it. My question is how much of this success has been borne on the backs of Ontarians through the much maligned health tax? The party also mentions eliminating coal fire generators- I'm all for it, if it can be done safely, and we have alternatives ready. In the mean time, what about looking into ways you can cleanly burn coal instead?

Under community it trumpets the government's cosmetic pesticide ban. That's a good thing for the environment and for people's overall health yes, but in 8 years is that all you've done for Ontario's communities? What about investment in community infrastructure (roads, arenas, arts centres)? Or what about keeping communities safe? I find it hard to believe a pesticide ban is the absolute best achievement you can think of for this section.

The education section announces the government's intention to completely implement the full-day Kindergarten by 2014-2015; 3-4 years away. Does this even belong on the platform for now? It's not yet completed, and there's no guarantee it will be carried over should McGuinty lose the election. I think a future government's hands are tied on this one; it's too far into the process now. And as for the estimated $6500/ year in savings to parents- how much of that goes back to the government in taxes?

Parents save $1400 on children's vaccines according to the family finances section of the platform. The provincial Liberals have offered 10% off on hydro bills in the form of an Ontario energy benefit. I'm naturally suspicious- or cynical, but I have to ask: If re-elected where will the provincial liberals make up that 10%? In new user fees? or maybe a new tax?

I hope there is more to the Liberal platform than this. The "Ontario Way" right now lacks the vision, and new ideas I'd hope to see from a party that has the significant advantage of having been in power for 8 years and is asking for a third mandate. It's as if the Liberals have given up before the campaign has really begun.

Life is a highway... but it doesn't have to be

2011-07-28T17:44:00.000-04:00

Much has been made of the idea to build a highway through the escarpment that would connect Niagara with the Greater Toronto area: Queen Elizabeth Way (QEW) with the 401. Town council voted against the idea instead deciding to back a recommendation to widen the 401 through Milton. A new highway would decrease the supply of prime farmland in this area, plus likely do environmental damage as well.

There are fears that although the Liberals have shot down the idea, if Hudak wins the October election he will go ahead with it. They may be justified- nobody can see the future. Flipping it around- if the Liberals are re-elected they may go ahead with the highway after all it is an election year. I think, coming from a farming area himself Hudak may be more understanding about it. The fact we're even talking about a new highway acknowledges in the future we could have a problem with mobility for people and goods.

Maybe what we need here, isn't necessarily a new highway. Maybe what we need is a wholesale culture makeover. A growing number of us work in jobs where we don't have to physically go to an office five days a week, or are lucky enough that thanks to technology we can work from home all the time. A number of us carpool. What if we gave tax breaks to businesses who allowed teleworking? Or what if we gave area businesses discounted transit passes?

I believe if you build it they will come- as corny as it sounds.If you build me a reliable, affordable, accessible transit system I'll be just as likely to use it as to drive the car- maybe more so depending on my destination. I see Metrolinx making slow progress in that direction; Councilor Colin Best added an amendment at Regional Council that would ask Metrolinx to accelerate their "Big Move" projects. so we're making slow progress, and I know there are plans to improve things in the future by connecting the different areas of Halton Region through transit.

I'd also make it so that any new main road more than two lanes (a Louis St. Laurent type of street), should have at least one lane either direction dedicated to public transit/ H.O.V. (carpool) traffic. Provincially make it so that any future new highway (e.g. : 400 series) should have at least one lane in either direction dedicated to transit. If the highway is 8-12 lanes in each direction, I'd increase it to a minimum of two lanes in either direction. It was a huge mistake not developing transit at the same time as we developed roads, and our communities, if we had we might not have this problem now.

As Tom Cochrane says "Life is a highway." But it doesn't have to be in Halton if we start making transit a regular part of our lives and a part of our future.

News Of The World

2011-07-21T15:10:00.000-04:00

There are so many aspects to this story, I don't know where to begin blogging about it. What's jumping out to me in a huge way is the accountability factor. Where were the voices in these people's heads asking the question "what if I get caught" Where were the editors saying "Where did you get those stories?" In my jobs so far I've come up with the ideas, pitched them to my boss and they okay them, or offer their feedback, even saying no sometimes.

The accountability for the phone hacking should go straight to the top. In Journalism- and generally in media your reputation is everything; and something like this could ruin reputations. With the hundreds of thousands of pounds going on in payoffs I find it hard to believe someone higher than the "managing editor didn't know about them. At the very least Rebekah Brooks knew, if not one of the Murdochs did.

Journalism is a powerful profession. Reporters are able to tell stories that matter, and shed the light onto issues of public importance. We're able to shape public opinion, and as the saying goes "speak truth to power." It's a heady responsibility, and in the case of the News of the World, people took it for granted. The buck needs to stop somewhere, not be flipped back and forth- and this one should go all the way to the top.

The Royal Visit

2011-07-10T19:55:00.000-04:00

There is nothing like seeing the country through the eyes of others. I knew Canada was a place of unparalleled beauty and incredible contrasts. And now the Duke, and Duchess of Cambridge know it too. They were only here for 9 days- long enough to experience a taste of what we have to offer as a country, and re-emphasize the fact we have not only a shared history with Great Britain, but traditions and culture of our own.

They are symbols of our history as a British colony; they'll be King and Queen here one day. But in their visit to Ottawa, and taking part in a citizenship ceremony- and in the trip to Prince Edward Island (P.E.I.). served as silent acknowledgement that Canada has its own unique history, and traditions.. In P.E.I. they visited "Province House" where the fathers of Confederation negotiated the accord that brought Canada into being.

In another piece of Canadiana William played street hockey in the Northwest Territories. The only things missing from the cliche was the golden Prince scoring the winning goal on a penalty shot, and for someone to yell "car." They were white hatted- given white cowboy hats by the Mayor of Calgary. What struck me watching the tour how casual it was, and at the same time it managed to combine the history, and tradition of the British Monarchy, with the uniqueness of Canada in a recipe for an incredible memory that will be talked about across the country.

This country when seen through Catherine and William's eyes is a magnificent place full of incomparable riches (What girl doesn't want diamonds?). The incredible beauty, and resources of the Northwest Territories, to the history of Québec City, Montreal, and Prince Edward Island. The traditions of the Stampede are something unique to Alberta. We forget how amazing a country this is- it's good to be reminded every so often.

So thank you William, and Catherine for showing us what a beautiful country this is. And for reminding us of our past, while at the same time giving us a taste of the future.

Canada Day in Milton: Where Past meets Future

2011-06-28T19:03:00.000-04:00

Canada Day July 1, is one of my favourite holidays. It's the one day where the chest swells with pride, and it's okay to stand up and say "I am Canadian" out loud. In Milton it's even more meaningful than just a long weekend- it's a day where the past meets the future.

The day starts off with honouring the past- a Veterans Breakfast. The Breakfast is followed by a quick wreath-laying ceremony at the cenotaph, and then a parade over to the fairgrounds. The other main event is the Citizenship ceremony at centre stage.

Last year was my first year as a member of the organizing committee; my second as the Looking out over the crowd I was reminded of how great a country this is. In the crowd sat people from all over the world; many countries less prosperous than this one. Many have fled war, and all have worked hard to at last become Canadians- to vote, be able to go to school; to do so much we take for granted. It made me appreciate the fact that I just happened to be born in Canada, and can do all that even more than I do already.

Friday July 1, is Canada Day. Come out and celebrate with the committee at the Milton Fairgrounds. See the Milton Canada Day website for a full schedule of events, and a bus schedule for the "event shuttle."

Building What? Together

2011-06-27T23:43:00.051-04:00

The province released its "Building Together" Plan a document that spells out the plan for infrastructure for the next 10 years. It reads like an election platform, rather than a policy document- as if someone said let's throw this one at the wall to see if it sticks. If it does, then maybe we'll get re-elected??

Most importantly for Milton there was no firm commitment for a hospital expansion. The section of the report applicable to that: Completing the 27 major hospital projects under construction, and continuing to invest in hospital expansions and redevelopment projects, subject to fiscal capacity. The plan also indicates the province will commit to 3-5 expansions/ redevelopment projects... subject to fiscal capacity- a phrase that will get them out of a lot of promises.

My understanding of the funding process is that prior to the release of the provincial government's latest budget, Milton along with other municipalities made a presentation to the province on why they deserve funding for the hospital or infrastructure project. That list was then wheedled down to 50 deserving communities, which, was supposed to be released before legislature was prorogued. This document doesn't spell out many specifics, and that not only hurts Milton, but all Ontarians.

Another disappointment to Milton: the post-secondary education portion of the plan. Recently the province decided that it should have the only say on where satellite campuses should go. Never mind the needs of an institution. Never mind the fact Laurier has land, and a willing partner in Sheridan College or the fact the town is the fastest growing in t he country, and among the youngest. the province still needs to say "yes." There are provisions in the plan for more universities and colleges, but again, as with healthcare they're vague.

It's a contradiction too. The Liberals want 407 expansion, Essex-Windsor highway- both will make it easier for commercial traffic to cross the borders. They want to add to the HOV (High Occupancy Vehicle) lanes, and build at least 500 centreline-kilometres of highway where warranted by growth and demand. What happened to the environmentally friendly Liberals? The ones that created Metrolinx, worked with the City of Toronto to change Transit City? Giving us still more ways to put more cars on the road, goes counterpoint to that doesn't it. Speaking of Transit, this is where Milton does get something: A promise of trains that are at least 12 cars. Something that should probably have happened around a decade ago.

I know this is a ten year plan, and a lot can change in a decade; subject to fiscal capacity. But where's the vision? Where's the creativity? The Progressive Conservatives have policy for families that can be clearly applied to their everyday lives. The Liberals- at least the ones who are in the provincial government right now are vague. Why not have a plan that would make that phrase "subject to fiscal capacity" a thing of the past?

This plan is unimaginative. Ontario is facing a multi-billion dollar shortfall, failing infrastructure, and an aging population. What's needed is creative ideas that will solve problems. The Liberals want to build together. Build what together? Because you're going to need to be a lot more specific than this.

At Last it's over!

2011-06-25T23:01:00.000-04:00

Just after 8pm tonight- 57 hours after it began the House of Commons passed legislation that will send Postal workers back to work as soon as Monday. The parties will go to binding arbitration and be asked to present their 'best offers' to an arbitrator, and that arbitrator will decide the final contract.

The N.D.P. caused the filibuster. They objected to the legislation; specifically the raise being lower than negotiated, and to the fact it was "best offer" presentation to the arbitrator. They saw a negotiated settlement as being the only option for an outcome. And so they stalled- and every last MP got their chance to speak. In one way it was democracy in action; a party of ideals, and principles standing up for them; a rare occurrence when policies can be boiled down to an easy to remember catchphrase. In another it was insanity- saying the same thing over, and over again.

It was the binding arbitration that caused all the debate; the N.D.P. saw it as undermining the negotiating process; they were content to let the strike continue for a while and give it a chance. The government saw the possible costs to the economy- according to Minister Raitt between $9-31 million/ week, and that was enough to force action on the government's part.

The N.D.P. has always been the party of organized labour, advocating for union, and workers' right. Unions need to evolve; most sectors have half-decent working conditions, and fair wages. As the workforce ages, why not shift focus to longer-term pensions and health benefits instead of the wage increase. No matter the rules and legislation there will be unfairness in the labour world, so unions will always be needed. They just need to shift their focus.

What's in a Library Building?

2011-06-20T23:59:00.000-04:00

I went last week to the information session on Bruce St. Library. I was at the afternoon session and there was a pretty decent crowd for that one I watched the presentation, which, went through the three options, and made a recommendation. Those options are: to sell it outright, lease it, or put another library branch in the building. The Consultants recommended the Town maintain ownership, and lease it to another organization, entirely ruling out the possibility of having another small branch at the Bruce St. location

On the open market the consultant estimates the buildings at 45 Bruce St, and 407 Pine St would get at least $3 million each. And that's without a bidding war- I can see that could present a huge temptation; sell off the property get the $6 million or more, use the money to service a few debts, maybe put some of it towards that hospital expansion. Leasing would create a consistent revenue stream, and put the building to good use.

I got the feeling from the presentation though, the consultants still didn't see the consequences of removing the library from the neighbourhood.. I think the Town, and consultants underestimated the success of the petition to save Bruce St, or this issue would generate such a buzz among the people. It's clear from the over 1,000 signatures there is some desire for Bruce St. as a branch library, and hopefully Council will listen and make something happen. It doesn't make sense to put an increased population in that area through intensification and then take an amenity like a library away. I'd imagine that proximity to a library would be a huge draw to move to an area and could increase the real estate values.

In the absence of more branch libraries in the west end it only makes sense to leave a branch library along Main St. With the movement of the main Library out to its Main and Thompson location, and the Beatty Branch it could appear as if the resource distribution is unfair and make people who live in the core feel like they don't matter. When Council considers the consultants' presentation, they should consider the petition, and make those people feel like they matter.

New Writing Gig

2011-06-14T22:04:00.000-04:00

I was contacted by the editor at T-Post Magazine and asked to be a contributor, and today have had my first article published. Their concept: make T-shirts out of today's news stories. Writers submit articles, and readers can vote, comment or just "like it." Every month editors select pieces from their top 10, and the winners will have their article put on a T-shirt. Writers and graphic artists get paid $1200.

So check out my article: Break from Your Cell, and vote. Keep watching the site for new articles from me.

Saving St. Paul's: A Step in the right direction

2011-06-13T00:34:00.000-04:00

St. Paul's Church will be restored. In a close vote of 174-151, the congregation voted for restoration, instead of demolition. It was the right thing to do; St Paul's has been around for over a century. It is a Milton landmark; its church tower keeping watch over Main St for as long as many can remember.

But is this the end? The church faces an up-hill climb. First it has to present to the Halton Presbytery a financial plan on how to pay for the repairs; a total bill of possibly as much as $1.5 million. And then they have to raise the money; by no means an easy task. But there is enough willpower here to do it; most of us have fond memories of the place- I've said before I remember sleepovers for Girl Guides; it's seen its share of life's milestones. The last time I was there, was a Leona Boyd Concert; she, and a guitarist sat in chairs at the front of room- it was as if the audience settled in for story time or something. It was her first concert on the comeback trail. It's played a big enough role in many people's lives there is a strength of sentimentality that would fuel fundraising efforts.

174-151; a 23 vote difference. Is this a strong enough majority to back a move restore it? Or is it more reflective of an obliviously split congregation. The plan to redevelop the site, the fire, and all that it's accompanied both has caused a lot of anger and bitterness amongst the congregation. It's the Presbytery's final decision- and 23 votes may not be enough to sway them towards keeping the building. And given the time this has taken to solve it; at least the last 4 years; probably longer it's likely they're going to end to it one way or the other. Shifting the focus inside the congregation; the close vote could also indicate the faction who want it taken down has gained strength.

I'm aware the situation at St. Paul's has caused many to leave the congregation. Its possible preservation could be enough to lure people back to fight for it. It also indicates that last year when Ward #3 councillor Cindy Lunau urged them to re-think the move to demolish, some people listened. Whatever the reason, a Milton landmark, and a piece of the past is about to be saved. In my book when that happens, it's something to celebrate.

The Protesting Page

2011-06-07T19:26:00.000-04:00

It's a free country- we can do whatever we want, say whatever we want. We have the right to peacefully protest including holding up an octagonal sign saying "Stop Harper" when the man is sitting less than 10 feet away. That's what Senate Page Brigette Depape did at the Throne Speech. She was of course ushered by security out of the Senate, and promptly fired.

There is a time, and a place for that kind of thing. In this case, it was likely outside on the lawns of Parliament Hill- would that have created the stir? No probably not. But keep in mind there was a news release on the one-woman show before the speech, combine that with facebook, and other methods of social networking; she might have had something there. But instead, she disrupted what was a rather important occasion.

What I'm having trouble wrapping my mind around is why now? She worked in the senate for a year; and had four before that to protest. If she felt that strongly why did she wait until now? She was a Senate Page; someone that can bend the ear of some powerful people- why not try and talk to Majory LeBreton- the Government leader in the Senate, and a cabinet minister to boot or any one of the senators from any party. A healthy exchange of ideas never hurt anyone; she could have even changed somebody's mind about an issue and made a difference.

The other issue I have is her call for a so-called "Arab spring." She needs to put it into perspective- what many are fighting for in the Middle East, is democracy- the right to have a voice and be heard by their governments. Guess what Brigette? We already have that- it's alive and kicking; that's why you weren't thrown in jail the minute after you produced that sign asking us to "Stop Harper."

To fund or not... We may not know the answer until after the election

2011-06-04T00:28:00.000-04:00

Premier Dalton McGuinty prorogued the provincial legislature until after this October's election. He did it without a whisper of opposition, without an outcry from the public. It also happened without the release of the list of who gets what infrastructure money over the next 10 years. Milton's hopes for a hospital expansion have to wait another few months yet, and that's not right.

Milton has been fighting for its expansion for the last 15 years or more, and the need has become critical in the last five. The pressure reached a fever pitch with the Friends of Milton District Hospital postcard campaign, and most recently with the petition that got 6 thousand signatures and was presented by MPP Ted Chudleigh at Queen's Park, and the rally held at Milton's Victoria Park.

Milton was supposed to be on a list of 50 communities slated to be released this month. But that may not come out now until after the October election. I doubt we were even on it. I was able to cover the Mayor's Breakfast a while back, and the special guest was Infrastructure Minister Bob Charielli. Ted Chudleigh was seated near the front of the room to hear the Minister go after both Tim Hudak, and himself in what was an extremely partisan speech. It left me the impression that it was vaguely personal- Chudleigh had been a pain in the Liberals' backside, and they were going to do and say whatever they had to, in order to stop the P.C.'s from taking the riding again. And if that meant denying a town that so obviously needs expanded hospital facilities, then so be it... the election campaign is on- all's fair in love and elections. The hospital may be dangled like a carrot to get us voting Liberal.

An expanded hospital has become a vital need for Milton. There is no room for proper surgical waiting areas, and the infrastructure that could support the latest equipment (sterilizers) has reached the end of its useful life. In the fairly recent experiences I've had, the great staff are doing their best with what they have. But I'm sure even they grow as frustrated as various councilors are.

I think the only thing to be done is to give up. Give up fighting this government- wait until the next one is elected; because I believe it will be Progressive Conservative. Having toured the facilities, I think Hudak has a much better grasp of what Milton needs than the Premier ever would. And if he doesn't give Milton the money, then Chudleigh could become as big a pain in Hudak's rear end as he is to the Liberals.

Bruce St. Library: The Sequel

2011-06-01T22:56:00.000-04:00

The idea of a new central library isn't new; it's been part of Milton's Destiny 2, and part of a library master plan. What surprised everyone, was the rate of Milton's growth and the fact the money came for it in the first place.The money came through the Conservatives' Economic Action plan; stimulus money given by the Conservative government for infrastructure projects such as the Milton Arts Centre.

I have been covering the story for the last year; ever since the decision was made to close the building. As part of my job I was able to interview Head Librarian Leslie Fitch. The one thing that amazed me about it was the vibe she didn't care what the closure would do to the neighbourhood. She had a bright, shiny, new toy in the new library- what happened after the building closed didn't matter.

In doing research on it, and talking to people it seemed nobody spoke up on behalf of the Library board. Nobody asked the question: "What do we do when the building is closed?" Nobody asked if it was even possible to keep it open. There is a pretty strong argument for keeping it open at least as a smaller branch. The area is going to be intensified- why add in a few thousand people and take away a service? I'd imagine the convenience of having a service such as a library close by would be a big draw for people moving to the area.

And I know there are Councillors who believe we can't support two libraries 2 km's apart from each other. Try telling that to seniors who live in the surrounding apartment buildings, or downtown along Millside drive. I think we can. When the new central branch opens all Library services will have effectively moved to the east side of Milton- so what about the west half of town? Bruce St. is probably closer for people living off the northern part of Scott Blvd. Or what about living in the apartment buildings Bronte South of Main St. It's closer for them too. And I know, the average answer is; they can take the bus. But there are people in town who don't have the money for a bus.

There have been options proposed for the building including the future home of a school, and some kind of mixed use building for both youth and seniors. I just don't want to see the possibility of a branch library discounted. Of those offered I like the school idea the best; that's what the building once was.

If you feel the same way, there's an information session at the Milton Seniors Centre on June 16, 2011 at 7pm. Hope to see you there!

Progressive Conservative "Change Book"

2011-05-31T23:56:00.002-04:00

The Progressive Conservative platform Changebook is a winner from a communications standpoint. It hits on the themes of voters who want change, family, and general fatigue with the broken promises and scandal of the McGuinty regime. Reading it, you can practically hear Hudak's voice in parts of it. I think it captures a mood in Ontario that maybe the Liberals haven't caught onto yet.

And it really does promise change for families; income splitting for parents; tax breaks for caregivers with elderly family members. Help with red tape for small business, a promise to put more money into healthcare. The idea of "Justice for all," to make prisoners in Ontario Jails work for their privlages. Hudak wants to clean up government and has promised no tax increases unless they have a mandate to do so. A noble promise yes, but who actually gives their government a mandate to raise taxes? It's ridiculous.

But; what's in it for me? I'm not a family yet. I'm not a caregiver for an elderly family member, or a small business. I'm a little bit past the initial university/ college stage to benefit from changes to the apprenticeship program. I'm just a single person trying to make my way in the world; keep up with all my bills. It appears there's nothing really in the platform for me for people like me... I was hoping for an HST cut at least. It's all well and good to base a platform around families; just remember single people live here too.

Walking Piano: It's a Want, not a Need

2011-05-28T13:08:00.000-04:00

I had to chuckle a bit at the title of a thread on the Hawthorne Villager: Milton Walking Piano Proposal. And then I read it. The main reaction I had was it was a neat idea, but if a corporate sponsor couldn't be found for all costs associated with it, it shouldn't happen. We shouldn't use the community fund for it either- not when we're trying to save for a hospital expansion, and there are numerous other infrastructure projects on the go or need moving up. I classify it as a want, not a need.

I have read through the report, and Town Staff pointed out the Arts Centre was coming in on budget. "However, given the fact that the Theatre is not yet complete, and until staff are operational in the facility, there remains a list of “fit out” items which will need to be purchased." Initial plans in March 2010 called for only the theatre's shell to be built, so in all likelihood there will be extra costs.

Town Staff wants part of the costs shared with the Community Fund, which is a bad idea. I think the spirit of the Community Fund is to provide money for events, facilities, and causes that will benefit the majority of people in the town of Milton. A "Walking Piano" only benefits me if I go into the Arts Centre, and say "hey that looks cool" and walk up the stairs. I don't buy into the physical fitness argument- the Milton Sports Centre expansion will do more for my fitness than the walking piano.

It's about priorities too. This is the kind of project you usually hear about when governments have been in power too long- Council has been there barely six months. The priority with the Arts Centre should be to get it up and running smoothly- and try to stabilize the funding for it. There are so many other things going on around town that need to be expanded, fixed, and built. A "Walking Piano" isn't one of them.

The Fantastic Finish

2011-05-10T19:45:00.000-04:00

So... that was a fantastic finish election night wasn't it? It was initially a foregone conclusion; the Conservatives would win; but the N.D.P. did give them quite a scare didn't they?

I'm one of the few people who will publicly admit that I can find few faults with a Conservative majority government. Four years of unadulterated peace, of not wondering if that next budget or policy announcement will lose the confidence of the House. Four years to see what Stephen Harper can do with a majority, which, I think will prove very interesting. The results are mixed for Harper; he lost four cabinet ministers, and Quebec. Each has to be considered a light slap on the wrist. But he gained seats in what was previously termed the "Liberal fortress" Toronto and Ontario in general. The fact Harper would end the campagin the place he started- as Prime Minister was never in doubt who would oppose him was a different matter.

From the get-go everyone thought it was going to be the Liberals. They had a good platform launch, and some good ideas. Around the time of the English debate it all fell apart. It was then when the affable, charming Jack Layton of the N.D.P. struck a blow against his Liberal counterpart Michael Ignatieff. It was on the surface a harmless comment- Layton remarked on Ignatieff's attendance- or absence in the House of Commons. Ignatieff just brushed it aside, and that moment did more to crystalize why Canadians don't like Michael Ignatieff than any Conservative attack ad.

Things then began to get worse for Ignatieff; there were the near hysterical "rise up" moments. And the moments where the party brought out Paul Martin, and Jean Chretien- each viewed as a sign of the party's growing desperation. And while it got worse for him, it got better for Jack Layton.

Layton's poll numbers continued going up. Suddenly there was something about the N.D.P. that Canadians liked. Within days of the election there were scenarios that would have seen Jack Layton Prime Minister. Who knows why he got as popular as he did; it might have been the underlying need for a change or the need to see something positive going on in Ottawa. Whatever the reason was we woke up to an N.D.P sitting in the opposition with over 100 seats, and the Liberals sitting a historic third place at 34 seats. As an added bonus, the Sepratist Bloc Quebecios were reduced to 4 seats, and not one of them was Gilles Duceppe. The Greens even had their first MP thanks to Elizabeth May.

I think the N.D.P. could very well temper the Conservatives. Historically they've served as the country's "social conscience" and there's really no reason why they can't continue in that role more powerful than ever. I don't think there's anything to fear from Harper's majority- the N.D.P. will temper it, and probably force them to go a little more left. And a majority will mean a lot less sniping, and a little more governing- I don't know about you, but I am so ready for that. Let's see what Harper will do the next four years- and then if we don't like it, we can throw him out.

Get out and Vote

2011-04-22T21:50:00.000-04:00

In addition to my writing/editing duties at Milton Today Magazine I've taken up producing as well. My work as a Producer can mean anything from contacting political candidates, to being in the field with reporters and cameramen. This last Tuesday I was out with a cameraman shooting videos for our debate. We were outside a well-known grocery store, trying to get people to ask a question of Halton's candidates in the federal election. There were people who actually told us they didn't vote and weren't following the election.

I was shocked. But in a way I understood- four federal elections in the last seven years is a bit much. And I can understand the cynicism and the general jaded feelings going around out there; I have at times felt them myself. But being jaded, and cynical are no excuses for not voting. A vote is the most valuable tool we have in a democracy. It can be used to effect change- don't like what Harper's doing about corporate taxes? Here's your chance; vote Liberal. Don't like the Liberal platform? There's always the NDP, or Conservatives. Don't like any of the choices? Spoil your ballot, or register an abstention. It's up to you, it's your choice- all you have to do is make it. You have the choice; and isn't that one of the many selling points of Canada? If you don't vote how can you complain about what's happening afterwards?

Think about what's happening in the middle east. Egypt, Libya, Yemen, and Syria. Around the world they're fighting for the right to vote, and some are dying just so they can vote. And here we are about to vote in the fourth election in seven years- why not be thankful that we have a choice; and that we can take the 15 minutes to go down to our local polling station and mark an X beside the individual of our choice.

Advance Polls opened today, and are open tomorrow and Monday from noon-8pm. Three chances to get out on vote. Or you can get out and vote on election day. I've been pretty obvious about my choice; but what's right for me, probably isn't right for you. All that matters is that you get out and vote.

We can do better than that

2011-04-17T20:10:00.000-04:00

I watched the English Language debate last week, as I'm sure a lot of you did. It didn't really change my vote- I was leaning Conservative before the debate, and I'm still leaning that way. But as I was watching it, I had the overwhelming thought that we can do better.

It was essentially four older men in a room, talking (or in Ignatieff's case sometimes lecturing) to each other. They didn't capture our imaginations with ideas, or catch each other up too much in a lie. And we can do better than that, because the fact is- the vision of four men in a room doesn't reflect Canada anymore; it hasn't for sometime now.

The Canada that I know, is full of dynamic, interesting people with creative ideas for addressing our country's problems. It's full of smart, engaging women who believe they can make a difference. Look for a moment at our riding; the four major parties are represented by women- Liberal Connie Laurin-Bowie, NDP: Pat Heroux, Conservatives- Lisa Raitt, and Green Party's Judi Remigio. The New Democratic Party alone, has 123 female candidates running across the country. And yet Green Party leader Elizabeth May the only female leader who could reflect the increased numbers of women in politics of all stripes wasn't invited to the debate?? How out-of touch was that??

At the same time, Canadians grow tired of the same old way of doing things. We are craving new ideas and a vision for the country. We grow cynical, and jaded as the same lines are trotted out again, and again- "Coalitions bad, majority good," "Harper doesn't care about health care," "Ignatieff isn't back for you," and so, on. We grow tired of the political scandals, and the way it appears that the default is to damage control first, and apologize last. And I'm tired of the negativity- don't tell me what the Harper Conservatives won't do, tell us what Ignatieff Liberals will do. The debate brought home to me that we can do better than the choices we have. We just have to demand it.

Why Elizabeth May Should be in the Debate

2011-03-31T18:41:00.000-04:00

In a controversial decision made by the broadcast consortium responsible for the leaders debate The Green Party's Elizabeth May has been excluded once again. I think it's the wrong decision.

The Green Party don't have an MP in the House of Commons. But they do run candidates in all 308 ridings across the country. The Bloc Quebecios run candidates in only Quebec's 75 ridings, want to separate from Canada, and yet Gilles Duceppe is sitting at the table. Doesn't she deserve a seat at the table on that alone?

The media (and I include myself in that) have a responsibiltiy to see Canadians make an informed decision on voting day no matter what our own personal biases may be. Elizabeth May represents a valid point-of-view, with policies some Canadians believe in and do vote for; don't these people deserve a chance at being heard? The precedent has already been set, she was allowed to debate the last time out. What's the harm in having her debate this time?

We complain there are no women in politics. We ask ourselves why, and try to find different ways to encourage their participation. And yet when a well-spoken woman who happens to be a party leader comes along, representing a party that increases its popular vote every election she isn't allowed to debate her fellow leaders? There's something wrong with this picture. Let her debate. Let her make the Green Party's case before the people of Canada. It can only help democracy.

What about coalitions?

2011-03-28T17:00:00.000-04:00

Here we are three days into an election campaign that nobody wants, and one that nobody will admit to causing. All parties are jumping on the idea of "coalition" as if it's a dirty word. Ignatieff is saying point-blank he isn't going to enter into one, and Harper is saying he's lying. Adding to the mix is the Bloc Québecois's Gilles Duceppe saying more or less that Harper's a hypocrite who would've entered into one with him, and Layton in 2004 to bring Martin down... and he has the letter to prove it.

I wonder though, what is so bad about a coalition? It seems to be a perfectly valid way of governing. Israel governs itself as a coalition. The United Kingdom- -the mother of all Parliamentary democracies is being governed right now by a coalition. In the United States, the Democratic President has to get along with Republican House to pass his agenda. everywhere governments have to get along with each other, so why not here?

This coalition idea has worked in the past. MacDonald had to work with Cartier. Pearson had to work with Diefenbaker, and Trudeau had to work with people to get his agenda passed too. Cooperation in this form is a proud Canadian tradition. In a way a coalition makes sense, is closer to what most Canadians believe- Liberal social beliefs with a Conservative way (smaller steps toward a larger vision) of getting there.

Whatever happens, the word is out there. Canadians are discussing the concept, and no accusations and arguments among the leaders is going take it out of the discussion. I think quite the opposite- if Harper and Ignatieff keep arguing about it, it could send voters running for a third or fourth choice. Let's change the channel and talk about something else.

The Mayor's Breakfast

2011-02-20T11:43:00.005-05:00

I'm declaring a bias. I think Ted Chudleigh is a good man, and has done a good job representing the voters. He's been yelling long, and loud about the hospital- and is widely seen, and known in the riding. I think he will win the next provincial election. As a member of the press, he's been available and willing to answer my questions in a direct way.

This past Tuesday was Mayor's Breakfast- an annual gathering of business leaders, and politicians to hear about the year that was in Milton. Attending was MPP Ted Chudleigh MP Lisa Raitt, Mayor Gord Krantz, and a special guest Minister Bob Chairelli of Infrastructure who made a few remarks. He was introduced by the Mayor, and then proceeded to blast Mr. Hudak over the PC's stance on infrastructure funding. He was free to make them, but was it the right forum?

I don't think it was. He was there to celebrate the completion of the Arts Centre- a project that was completed despite our MPP being a member of the opposition- and our Federal MP being a Conservative. Such cooperation is rare in this atmosphere and should be celebrated when it happens. Besides isn't there some kind of unwritten code about government members (in this case a Liberal) coming into a riding and slagging the MPP (a Progressive Conservative) when he's sitting right in front of the podium or vice versa?

I don't think it was because it was in front of a business audience- the only other politician who spoke was Mayor Krantz. Usually when politicians are campaigning in that atmosphere it's more an argument saying what they'll do to improve business, and the economy- arguing for votes. This wasn't; it was more of a rant against Mr. Hudak, and Mr. Chudleigh. And when it came down to spelling out what the Liberals would do for infrastructure he pointed to a "10-point plan" that they think is"visionary and forward thinking." I'm pretty sure they meant the Places to Grow legislation, but then again the Minister wasn't specific.

I was talking to a friend afterwards, and he pointed out a double standard. Let's face it, if it was the other way around- the PC's would've been completely blasted by the Liberals. And he's right. But so far Tim Hudak has done nothing to define himself in a positive way, so this early negativity could stick- and be so memorable the PC's will again be sitting in opposition on October 7, 2011.

I feel like I should challenge our provincial politicians. You are better than petty bickering- both sides have ideas, and different visions for governing Ontario. Let's have an election based on those instead of bickering. Who knows you might actually interest a few voters.

St. Paul's: I Didn't Want to Be Right

2011-01-16T18:32:00.000-05:00

I hate being right about this one. I have covered it for the newspaper, doing an article on the fire itself, and at least one on the fall-out. I made no secret that based on evidence, and people I'd spoken with I thought it was arson. I never thought I'd be right. I wanted it to be an easily explainable electrical fire. Because in this case, being right meant that someone would want to set fire to a house of worship something I found at the time to be inconceivable, and even now I have trouble getting my head around it.

I am familiar with the history of the fight. St Paul's is as they say "a house divided." There's one group within the congregation wanting to completely demolish the church, and put in its place a life-lease condo, with space for worship. Another wants to save the building, no matter what it costs. That somebody in either of these factions set fire to the place- a house of worship- a place of serenity, peace, hope and charity is just...

Un-Christian. Churches were never supposed to make money. They're supposed to be places of charity, of gathering. They're supposed to spread the word of God, to be kind, and promote the spirit of generosity. They're supposed provide a type of sanctuary for people to get away from it all, and leave with a better understanding of themselves. Instead St. Paul's has been a place of bitter, divisive conflict that may in the end cost Milton a landmark.

If you know anything about what happened the night of June, 30, 2010 please call Detective Constable Colin Grierson of Halton Regional Police's Fraud Squad at: 905-465-8744.

Dalton McGuinty and the self-fulfilling prophecy

2011-01-08T10:57:00.000-05:00

I'm not the biggest fan of Dalton McGuinty. My opinion is based mostly on his politics, and his government's general conduct, than any personal dislike- I have met the man and found him to be a far more charismatic guy in person, than on television. Yesterday he started hinting at his eventual retirement even if he wins this October's provincial election, a fact which probably put a smile on the face of many Progressive Conservatives everywhere- and quite a few Ontarians including myself.

Even though I'm not a fan, I don't think it should end like this. The way he's talking of his eventual departure makes it a self-fulfilling prophecy; and it does his party no favours. Barring any major catastrophe on the P.C.'s part, the Liberals are probably going to lose this October's election. But let's say for the sake of argument they win, and McGuinty is looking at another 4 year term as Premier (in the case of a majority). And as he's hinting he steps down within a couple of years; two years for his successor to get their feet wet before having to fight another election- it makes total sense from the Liberals point-of-view.

There's another possible outcome: what if he wins with a minority? The same scenario applies- but look at the consequences. A minority as we see on the federal scene is under the constant threat of an election. If McGuinty leaves after that two year period, there could be a new election. Are we willing to have a minority on the federal, and provincial levels?

The Liberal Party is already facing an uphill battle they probably won't win. McGuinty should either resign now, and let the new leader begin the eventual makeover that will eventually happen. Or he should've kept his mouth shut and tried to rally his troops. As the saying goes, the captain should always go down with the ship.

Library Consultation

2010-12-08T18:14:00.000-05:00

I went to the afternoon meeting yesterday, and was pleased to see many other of my fellow Miltonians there too. It felt forced, and the consultants certainly had a lot to do with that vibe; saying they had no real interest in the building's future- granted they are outside consultants, did they really need to voice that sentiment out loud? But I digress...

It's impossible to keep it as a central branch, and we all understand that. Taking that out of the equation the options are: we sell it or lease it, take it down, or keep it as a branch.  One of my favourite options out of those presented yesterday was the idea of the Milton Christian School moving there.  Milton Public Library was once the Bruce St. school, it seems oddly poetic that it become one again. Another is some kind of Youth/Seniors centre mix. Somebody pointed out the two groups have a lot to learn from one another- in a neighbourhood that has a lot of seniors in it- why not give it to somebody who would use it?

Ideally I would keep it as a Branch library. Milton is growing; arguably it could support a branch in that location. Taking into account intensification the question that kept crossing my mind was: if you're putting extra people into that area, then why take a service away? It makes no sense.   If it stays there, I wouldn't cut it to the proposed 6,000 sq ft. I would cut it in half to 8,000 sq ft instead.

Whatever decision this council finally comes to on the Bruce St Library it shouldn't be bound by past mistakes. And in hindsight it was a mistake to open a new one, without questioning what would happen to the old one.  But, we still have time to correct it.

Remembrance Day and Afghanistan

2010-11-11T23:29:00.000-05:00

When I was young, I was always aware of Remembrance Day. I remember lots of cold November Sundays marching in the parade with Girl Guides, and gathering around the cenotaph. In school, I can recall yearly assemblies held- often with Veterans in to speak to us; they brought the history to life.

Now, as I've grown older I've become more aware of that history. What Canadian soldiers did in both world wars was nothing short of heroic. In W.W. I the French, and English tried to take Vimy Ridge, and failed. But the Canadians succeeded, and have been honoured for it with a monument on French soil. In W.W. II, Canadians landed on Juno Beach on D-Day, and ended up gaining the most ground of any allied forces in Occupied France. They fought through Italy, and in Holland when the Nazis finally surrendered their hold on that country, they did so to a Canadian General. This is just some of what we are honouring as we pause today- at the eleventh hour, of the eleventh day, of the eleventh month for two minutes of silence. We will remember them.

In remembering the past today, let's also spare a thought for the future. Canada is still fighting a war in Afghanistan; our soldiers trying to bring the same values to that country, others defended on our behalf so long ago. I have been fortunate enough in the course of my job to meet a Veteran of that conflict. He served one tour there, and would consider serving another. For me, that has put a face on the conflict happening half a world away.

At 11am I thought of the soldiers fighting in Afghanistan, and I thought of the younger faces I saw at the cenotaph. I hope we will listen to the stories of the Afghan Veterans as surely as we listen to the older gentlemen. Because in listening that's the only way we learn.

Spare a thought today or any day for those who fought for our freedom, and those who continue fighting for it.

What an Election!!

2010-09-20T17:28:00.000-04:00

This is shaping up to be quite the election 40 candidates have registered for 8 ward seats, 2 regional council seats, and Mayor's chair. And I find myself in the interesting position of having met them all. All are passionate, and believe in Milton, and believe they can make difference.

The general issues I see cropping up are: hospital expansion, growth, and the whole notion of an "new milton, old milton." idea. The hospital expansion comes down to money of course. Some believe it's about pledging- $60 million over 30 years in order to show the province we're serious. Others believe in fundraising, and that a tax increase should be the last option. I've said before in other entries, a good thing to keep in mind is that nothing can be done about the hospital, without provincial consent... something that isn't gauranteed.

Growth I think will always be an issue here. Town Council has just approved Boyne development, the size of which will see Milton double. The new council will have to grapple with concerns dealing with building infrastrucutre, and financing it. Council will also have to deal with the continuing consequences of too much growth too soon, and finish catching the infrastructure up with the rest of subdivisions.

I know the terms of "new milton" and "old milton" are ways of geographically designating the town; ways to describe where we live, and where we work. But are they more? Could they be used to do divide people. And speaking of "old"- the matter of St. Paul's is still on the front burner. But it's doing the job getting people talking about what we kind of Milton we want. What kind of identity do we want? Do we want to keep the gorgeous downtown full of life, and restaurants along Main St? Or do we want to become another Mississauga?

There are a lot of issues for the upcoming council to decide. But before they make their decisions, we need to do our research, and vote.

St. Paul's

2010-07-07T11:18:00.000-04:00

I have an attachment to St. Paul's Church. My grandparents were members there, my parents were married there. I spent happy sleepovers throughout my time in girl guides there- the place is full of happy memories for me, as I'm sure it is for at least half the town. These happy memories, and emotions made it difficult for me to hear on Canada Day that there was a fire at this beloved Milton landmark.

Shock was what I felt when I first heard it, followed in typical reporter fashion by the need to do the story. I did the story, and frankly I'm sceptical that the cause was electrical in nature.  For the last two years the place has been involved in a redevelopment idea- to take down the old church, and in its place put a life-lease condominum as well as new worship space. It is a decision that has caused much argument among the congregation, and town at large. It was recently announced St. Paul's had plans to apply for a demolition permit- the matter is being heard before Heritage Milton tomorrow (Thursday).  The situation makes me ask- if the whole situation doesn't sew the seeds of suspicion on the fire's cause, then what does? I don't think the church should really blame the rest of us for concluding there is a possibility it was arson.

Looking at it without emotion, and in purely practical terms, there are legitmate arguments on both sides. On the one side is heritage- the place has been a part of Milton for about as long as Milton has existed. It's dominated that part of downtown, and it's hard to imagine that part of downtown without it.  It has the fabled "rose window" as well as several from World War One. This kind of history is hard to find, can we really afford to lose that? If it gets designation, I think it's worth looking at the downtown as some kind of heritage district.

On the other hand. There is no denying progress. St. Paul's is part of the area targted for intensification- more seniors housing would fit well there.  Damage from the fire is said to be in the six figure range- Would it cost more to fix the damage, and the pre-existing structural problems than it would to just take it down and start again?

I'm a history lover. I would love to see the place saved. I can't really picture what downtown Milton would look like without it. But the reality is, it may happen. I hope before a final decision is made, they discover what exactly happened in the fire, be it electrical or something more sinister.

Lifting The Curtain

2010-06-17T12:46:00.000-04:00

In this week's Halton Compass, I did a story on Ted Chudleigh's nomination as the Progressive Conservative (PC) candidate in next year's provincial election. In town for the meeting, and events related to the ongoing fight against the HST was PC Leader Tim Hudak. Following the formal part of the meeting, my colleague from the Champion and I were offered time with the leader... we're reporters and it's not everyday we're offered time with the leader of the opposition, and someone who could potentially be the next Premier of Ontario. So we took it, and my colleauge's article is also in this week's Champion. He chose to focus on the hospital, and the local funding' portion.

But here's where we differ. I read the situation in a completely different manner. The way I read it was here was a man who is probably 1 year out from fighting a provincial election. Hudak wants to make frontline healthcare a priority, but admits he needs a better business environment if the province is to continue its financial recovery. And on some level I think he realizes financially the needed financial committment may not be possible. He wants to disband the LHINS (Local Health Integrated Network) but doesn't know what if anything to replace them with.

Call me an eternal optimist, but I think we should take a wait-and see approach before we discount the DC idea. It's a long time between now and next October.

Milton District Hospital: Devil's Advocate

2010-06-01T22:17:00.000-04:00

As some of you know I've been spending time lately in the role of devil's advocate asking the question: What if the Province says "No" to Milton's hospital expansion? Given the extremely unpopular nature of the question I've had varying degrees of success in actually getting answers as you can imagine.

Most say "No" isn't an option; MPP Ted Chudleigh says he can't conceive of a case where Milton wouldn't be near the top of the priority list. One councillor backs him up saying the province can't say no. The same councillor also says we're not even on the desired priority list. So my question still stands, what if the province says no" to Hospital expansion?.

The Case for a hospital: Milton, a community with a population of around 75 thousand by now is being served by a hospital built to serve 35,000. The facilities there have according to a LHIN report reached the end of their working lives- so if there is room for expansion in existing facilities, chances are it would cost much less to build a new one, than to update the technology. And let's say we've raised our part of the required funds making our request even harder to say no to. That's a pretty powerful case- and when put this way, with the addition of the growth reports it could make a new expanded hospital for Milton a near certainty.

But it's not. And here I come to the case against it. The case against it boils down to money- it does make the world go around. And right now there isn't enough of it, making for some interesting, if controversial decisions. From a provincial perspective, I'm looking at Milton, and I'm looking at Oakville and I'm thinking a hospital with state-of-the art techonlogy is being built at Dundas and 3rd line- new facilities at Milton aren't exactly critical, despite what town council says.

Another scenario under the "no" perspective is the possibility there will be a new provincial government next year under the Progressive Conservatives. Chudleigh says he'd fight for funding for this project, and I believe him. But the possibility still exists a Progressive Conservative government could get elected, and then realize the books are in much worse shape than they've been briefed. And then they'll have to make cutbacks.

The case for a hospital is a strong one- an expanded population, and out-of-date facilities. We should go for the new hospital, but I also think we have to consider the question: "what if the province says no?"

Milton District Hospital Part #2: "Show Me The Money"

2010-05-18T22:00:00.000-04:00

I was at Milton Council meeting last night and they had a presentation by Halton Health Services on the expansion project at Milton Hospital. They're calling for a full-service expansion on the Milton site they hope will be the same level as the new Oakville Hospital. The presentation backed a motion proposed by Councillor Cindy Lunau, part of which deals with raising money reads: "including a special tax levy on the municipal property bill in the 2011 budget considerations."

In their presentation, and when pressed afterwards they didn't say exactly how much they need; they couldn't because of the tendering process going on with the Oakville site. I understand, but it made me uneasy. I thought; you're here, asking for my money, and can't tell me how much you want- or really for what you want it for? other than the idea it's going to be for a "full-service hospital". It struck me as a little odd to say the least. I would've liked to see a range.

Halton Health Services (HHS) is planning 10 years in advance. Five years from now the new Oakville hospital will be finished- so we're looking at possibly 2020, or later. Given the 10- year planning schedule, all variables including the possibility of switching governments mid-stream, why don't we take a step back? I know... we need the hospital now. You really won't get much argument from me on that, after all town isn't getting smaller. But shouldn't we at least take our time, and have a long look at how much this is going to cost- how long are we going to see this possible charge on our property tax bill?

Another problem with this is the province; they are the final judge on healthcare. Potentially after all this fundraising they could still say no. There are other places competing for the same money- yes, Milton is the fastest-growing municipality in the country and that should count for something. But in a province that is cash strapped, and seeing a year-long infrastructure audit the possibility of a "no" answer exists... even though I've been told by sources that failure in getting the expansion done, simply isn't an option.

The province could also say "yes," but scenario. The but could place limits on the expansion in terms of departments. Yes, you can have your expansion- but only with the ER, Maternity, and some day surgeries. Everything else should go to Oakville.

I completely agree that we need an expanded hospital- the population of Milton is nearing 100,000. But don't we owe it to future and current residents that we achieve it, in a financially responsible way? Let's take a step back, get more information and look at our options. More information never hurt anyone.

Regional Transit

2010-04-22T15:48:00.000-04:00

I was at a presentation given by the Region on its transportation plan until 2031. It was interesting- improvements to area roads, and the addition of high-speed bus lines along Trafalgar and Dundas. But the one thing that was missing was the idea of regional transit. I asked afterwards, the response was no actual region-wide transit has been planned. The alternative: coordinating municipal transit systems.

Now to an extent I understand the reasons. The logistics alone of setting up a region-wide system. would be a big challenge. A region this size- stretching from the shores of Lake Ontario, as far north as I think #7 highway and across four municipalities. The smaller population in the northern parts of Halton region might not make for high ridership.

The costs for setting up such a system would be high, with likely not a lot of pay-off. Transit hardly ever makes money. I've often thought of public transit as a "if you build it, they will come" scenario. In other words I think if you planned it, and executed it well, making it affordable people would take it. I know I would. There were times when I went to Sheridan in Oakville I would've gladly leftt the car at home in favour of the bus. But I couldn't because I would've had to first take the bus into Peel, then down to Oakville. It's slightly better now, but still the only way to Oakville is an over-priced Go Bus that goes down Hwy 25 to the commuter lot at Bronte. I don't know about you, but I want a better way.

Milton District Hospital

2010-04-03T13:02:00.000-04:00

I've interviewed nine candidates so far, and this is probably the #1 issue. It affects us all, and ironically enough it's also the one thing that Milton Council can do little about, because the province looks after healthcare services, and decides who gets a new hospital. The LHIN (Local Health Integrated Network) for Halton- Peel has agreed with a recommendation that facilities at Milton have reached the end of their working life. And nobody can argue with that- how many of us have stories of being stuck in cramped waiting rooms? Additionally an argument can be made, that medicine has so advanced in the decades since the first expansion, and the hospital doesn't have the infrastructure to support the technology.

But it gets more complicated. The Region of Halton is a player in this as well, and has to balance not only Milton and its sudden growth spurt, but the needs of Oakville, Burlington and Halton Hills. Oakville is getting a new hospital at Third Line and Derry, a facility that I've been told will serve all of Halton Region. I've also heard that after that hospital is completed, then they'll move onto Milton, and Georgetown. So Milton has a bit of a wait.

And I know... nobody wants to wait. Especially since growth will continue and really at some point something has to give- physically that facility may not be able to support the town's needs. With that in mind, questions have been raised over how to fund a new hospital, particularly over using the money which, was put into a GTA pool. In theory it's a good idea that could go a long way to paying for a new hospital. But is putting aside money for a long-term goal, instead of toward improving town facilities and other badly needed infrastructure now a good idea? No. I think it's a bad idea because it's a big gamble. Yes we'll have the money set aside for a new hospital, but the province can still say 'no.' And then we'll have saved all this money for nothing.

Does having the money set aside for the new hospital make it harder for the provincial government to say no? It probably does. The province has limited resources and, looking at it from their point of view, if there are limited resources, two hospitals being built 20 minutes apart, one meant to serve 150 thousand people, the other a few million, then the resources are going first into the hospital meant to serve a few million.

Even though control rests in other levels of government, Milton isn't powerless in this situation. We should be lobbying our MPP/MP (Ted Chudleigh, and Lisa Raitt), bringing up the issue with our local councillors, and candidates as a way of keeping the pressure on. And fundraising is a good idea- the first expansion would probably not have been built if it weren't for community support. One of the candidates observed that you don't understand how Milton has grown until you live here. And that's true- we just need to make the provincial government understand that.

Development Potentially Done Right

2010-03-31T23:46:00.000-04:00

I was at a meeting of Milton Heights landowners last week (article in this week's Compass). A developer unveilled a concept of what the area could look like- 1200 home subdivision made up of a variety of housing (townhouses, single family, as well as some condos). They want to respect the history, and natural features of the area, and build around what's there already. It was a short presentation, followed by a Question and answer session.

The discussion was heated, and the residents passionate. But I was struck by a couple of things. The first were the concerns raised. They were over potential traffic problems through the area, not the fact it was being developed. The residents seemed okay with that part of it. I think maybe because the meeting itself made them feel empowered, like they were taking responsibility for how it would look.

So many times lately development has just sort of been there- subdivisions growing in practically overnight, with existing residents having no say whatsoever. And now here are people who are having a say in development. And on the flip side, a set of developers who appear so far at least willing to listen is a rare thing. The process gave credibility to putting into the development process a measure of public consultation.

The second thing I was struck by was the development itself. It isn't just cookie-cutter houses, sitting side-by-side. There is opportunity here for variety, and an opportunity to create a very unique looking part of Milton. And I think the residents realize this, and will fight for it. If this level of public consultation is kept up throughout the process, then this could be an example of development done right, and an inspiration to the rest of us to speak up when development hits our end of town.

Intensification& Growth

2010-03-22T14:21:00.000-04:00

As election issues they'll be dealt with in separate entries, but for this one, they're linked. Intensification is a process mandated by the province, to put a certain amount of jobs and people per hectare in areas called UGCS, or Urban Growth Centres. Milton's UGC stretches the length of Main St, from Bronte, on out to Thompson Road, and Ontario St as far south as Allendale. Milton's number is to reach is 200 persons and jobs/ hectare. Now this process is scheduled to take place between 2014-2031, and the matter returns to Council in June, 2010 for final approval.

Now onto growth- something that is happening at a near record pace in town. At tonight's Planning and adminstration meeting, there is on the agenda an item dealing with Mattamy Homes' plan to build a new 473 new homes on the northwest corner of St. Laurent Blvd, and 25 Highway. Also plans for two 10 storey-condos in the Fourth Line, and Derry Rd area.

In my ideal world, I'd throw up the yellow card to growth until we sort out what's going to happen with the UGC. A portion of it, is on a floodplain- and it's my understanding certain conditions must be met in order to remove that designation. Another issue dealing with the UGC is that great view of the escarpment. Everyone loves the view- complete with the historic buildings lining both sides of Main St. Now how do we preserve it? That is undecided as yet. And this one I'd argue deals directly with proposal for the 10 storey condominiums- once those are built, how is anyone going to be able to see the escarpment from behind or beside them?

Building height is another potentially thorny issue. There was talk at the last council meeting of the concept of bonusing- in other words if builders meet certain conditions they would be allowed to add height to their building. Exact specifics as to the conditions placed on this haven't been discussed yet.

Discussions have started on these issues, but nothing has really been decided yet. While we're talking about intensification, growth is still ongoing- and the pace is picking up. I think we should slow it down for a bit- deal with intensification issues first. Maybe instead of saying "yes" to Mattamy, Say yes, but only build half. Maybe say yes to the 10-storey condo, but come back with the design for an 8-storey.

I'm not against growth- it's brought many advantages to Milton, and I think if done just right intensification could make Milton even better than it is now. But if growth is allowed to continue at such a fast pace, while the town deals with intensification; it won't be long before the town is unrecognizable, and we're all left asking the question: "How did we end up here?"

Follow The Changing Ward Boundaries

2010-03-19T21:26:00.000-04:00

Thanks to a ward boundary review, the boundaries in the town of Milton have changed for this upcoming municipal election October 25th. The boundary review happens every two elections, and in this case three new wards have been added. The other major change, is there will be eight councillors representing eight different wards. More on the candidates, as we make our way towards election day.

The eight new ward boundaries are as follows:
Ward 1: North 401, South: Lower Base, West: Bell School Line, and east to: ninth line.
Your Current Councillors: Rick Day, and Brian Penman. At the Regional Level: Barry Lee, who is also the regional councillor for ward 3.
Candidates so far: Andrew Salmons
Update,27/4/10: Martin Capper

Ward 2: north: #5 Side Road, South: Derry Road, east: Fourth Line, and west: Tremaine Road
Your Current Councillors: At the municipal level: Mike Boughton, and Greg Nelson. At the regional level your councillor is Colin Best, who also serves as the regional councillor for ward 4.
Candidates so far: Mike Boughton, Greg Nelson, and Jennifer Smith.

Ward 3: north: Highway 7, south: Derry Road, east: Tremaine Road, west: Milborough Town Line.
Current Councillors: Cindy Lunau and Jan Mowbray.
Nobody has declared so far for ward #3.

Ward #4: north: Steeles Ave, south: CP railway, east: fourth line, west: Ontario St
Current Councillors: Wendy Schau, and Paul Scherer. Wendy Schau isn't running.
Candidates so far: Carey de Pass.

Ward #5: north: CP railway, south: Derry Rd, east: Fourth Line, west: Ontario St.
This is the first of four new wards, there are no councillors at the moment
Candidates so far: Arnold Huffman, and Mike Bugala

Ward #6: north: Derry Rd, south: Britainnia road, east: fourth line, west Thompson Rd
The second of four new wards, there are no current councillors
Candidates so far: Mike Cluett

Ward #7: north: Derry Rd, south: Britannia Rd, east: Thompson Rd, west: First Line
The third of four new wards, there are no current councillors.
Candidates so far: Rick Di Lorenzo, Paul Virdo, Marshall Horner and Mahammed Khan

Ward #8: north: Steeles Ave, south: Britannia Rd, east: CP railway, and west: Bell School Line
Candidates so far: Zeeshan Hamid, and Jeffery Belo

The regional councillors have been re-distributed as well. The one regional seat represents 1,6,7,and 8. Running for this seat so far is Tony Lambert. The other regional seat represents: 2,3,4 and 5. Running for this so far are Jan Mowbray, and Colin Best.

Candidates for Mayor so far are Gerry Marsh (officially), and Gord Krantz (unofficially).

To see a full ward map please visit: Milton's New Ward Boundaries

To see a list of individuals who have formally declared their candidacy please see: Candidate List. Check back often, as this is sujbect to change depending on new candidates.

MPL- Bruce Street

2010-03-15T22:05:00.000-04:00

Milton Public Library's Bruce Street location is slated to close. For those that don't know, it's the current central branch for the library, and it's due to close a year from now when the new library/visual arts centre/ theater is complete. The building itself is located just off Ontario St, behind the Seniors apartments, and has been a part of Milton for... as long as I can remember. Before it was a library, it was a school known as Bruce Street school, a fact attested to by the prescence of the bell out front.

I'm a total sentimentalist. It's the library where I enjoyed book clubs over the summer when I was younger, and a place where I can still gladly disappear in for an hour or so. But I see why we need a new central branch. We need it to reunite all facilities under one location- staff and services, and the chance to enlarge the collections, as well as provide bigger facilities for a growing population... all of those factors can't be denied.

But taking into account the growing population I think Milton can support three branches. Follow my logic for a moment. The town will grow south to Britannia, to use the Beatty Branch, and the new main library will serve as the hub for all branches. But what will all the folks who live downtown do? What will the people who live in the seniors apartments along Milside, and further west of Bronte do? What about those who live on Bronte? I know the answer to that will be drive or take the bus.  But what about people who rely mostly on walking to get around? What about people who can't afford to take a car, or even bus fare. Do they have to go without library facilities? I don't think that's fair.

I've been told by the Head Librarian the decision to close the facility has been in the works for over a decade.  And I wonder at the fact, that nobody in that time has ever looked at the officials plans and said: fine- build a beautiful new central library in the east end- but we're going to build more subdivisons in the west end, what are they going to use?? Why not keep the Bruce Street location open for them?

To be fair there are some good ideas being discussed for the building following its closure.  The region is talking about re-locating the seniors centre over there, after the lease expires next year. Another purpose is a youth centre. I'd favour the youth centre, or some kind of mixed use with a small resource or library component.

Despite the possibilities for the building, I think it's wrong to entirely discount the possibility of keeping it as an extra branch whatever its size. Whatever its purpose, the building could be a centrepice for the area.