I turned on my television to the news stations yesterday and found they had all gone on into breaking news coverage; the jury in the Shafia murder trial, had come to a verdict. I was transfixed; almost nervous with waiting for the announcement.
As I watched the coverage continue I was grasped by a growing sense of occasion. Canadians as we all know take great pride in our reputation as one of the most diverse nations on earth. I'd like to think of it as a mutually beneficial relationship; people come here to get the freedom to practice their traditions, and in return Canada adopts the best of each and ends up the better for it.
I wonder if yesterday was the moment when it all changed. In rendering a guilty verdict at the Shafia trial, Canada stood up and said; "No, this is not okay. It isn't right to take the lives of three women in the name of honour." Yesterday's guilty verdict may have been the moment where the line was drawn between practicing cultural traditions, and respecting the laws of the land.
In my opinion yesterday justice was served; a society's values were upheld. It is not okay to suppress three women who simply wanted to be like every other woman in Canada. Freedom is a cherished Canadian value, and that's what the victims wanted; the freedom to dress how they pleased, date whom they please, and speak their minds as they please. Just like me, and just like you.
Yesterday's verdict signaled to all those who practice such a horrific cultural tradition as honour killing that Canadian justice will come down hard on you. It's a message that although Canada is an open and accepting country to all who wish to make a future here; there are simply some practices that are completely unacceptable. I believe yesterday's verdict drew a line in the sand that said: "here's where our respect for your culture ends, and your respect for our laws begins."
Monday, January 30, 2012
Wednesday, January 25, 2012
How Do We Improve Downtown Milton?
There is room to improve. Mill St. should feel like a part of the downtown; whether that's through something as simple as a sign saying "this way to more shops/ Restaurants," at the pass through, or finding ways to include the street in festivals and events. Maybe find a way to make it physically part of the downtown; maybe making another little Square or something near Delacourts in a portion of the parking lots behind.
I'd love to see more variety in terms of shops. Right now Main St, is full of pubs, restuarants, and coffee shops. I'm a huge fan of all of those- especially coffee shops; I'd love to see more shops. I'd use this as an opportunity to get small businesses that offer really funky, trendy stuff- clothing boutiques with designs you wouldn't see anywhere else. Look for places that make people say when asked: "I got that in Downtown Milton, and there's only one store that carries it." A good example ofthis would be Locke St in Hamilton; there's such an easy-going vibe there. And it has a mixture of everything from coffee shops, and bakeries to jewellery stores.
Pick one day outside of the Market a month and make it a car-free day. It would be great for people just to wander up and down Main St, and get a sense of the shops down there. It may even build some community spirit; one of the things Milton is known for.
I would definitely look for ways to incorporate the Arts Centre somehow. It's supposed to be a centrepiece for those entering Milton, let's use it as one. It'd be a great opportunity for restaurants along Main St to offer vouchers for a discount on their meals if they show their tickets (or reciepts).
For me, Downtown Milton has always been vibrant, and friendly; and there has to be a way to keep it that way. We just have to work on it.
Crown-First Nations Gathering
Yesterday,The First Nations People met with members of the government, including the Prime Minister, and Governor General in what was known as the Crown-First Nations Gathering or #CFNG as it was known on Twitter.
The day started out with speeches from both the Prime Minister and First Nations Assembly Grand Chief Shawn Atleo. I watched both speeches, and they felt like two parties at the start of a negotiation. The Prime Minister said they wouldn't repeal the Indian Act, but would find creative ways to work around it. The Grand Chief called the Indian Act an obstacle to prosperity; recalling images of a boulder on the highway.
At this point, it's safe to say everyone agrees the Indian Act has been doing more harm than good. In an ideal world, it would be gone, no matter what had to happen. In hindsight the Indian Act was an ignorant piece of legislation that paved the way for disastrous programs like the Residential schools, and in some ways the Reserve system itself. It broke the trust between the First Nations, and Europeans- a trust that is only in the early stages of being repaired.
But this isn't an ideal world. It's a lot messier than that, and the Prime Minister acknowledged that reality, when he referred to the Indian Act as a tree with deep roots that goes back through history. This legislation has behind it over 140 years (1876) of history, and traditions behind it. Breaking that is going to prove a huge challenge. And I don't think you can ignore it; I think they should at least acknowledge .
Not to mention what would happen to the amendments since that legislation was passed, including the Charter of Rights and Freedoms which enshrined what rights granted to Natives under the Indian Act. I would imagine the constitution would likely have to be reopened, or amended to allow for the changes. At this point realistically repealing the Indian Act wouldn't work unless there was some kind of framework that could potentially replace it.
Harper's so-called "creative ideas" could turn into finding ways to help First Nations to form more partnerships such as those he described in his speech. Or it could be something like working with First Nations to reform the Reserve system; making sure all who live on Reserves enjoys the same living conditions as those who live off of them.
The tree that is the Indian Act can't be cut down yet. The thing about trees is they occasionally need pruning, and reshaping to allow for new growth; and that takes creativity and skill. It may take a while, but I think the Indian Act will in the long term will be repealed. I just think it's going take a lot of creativity and hard work before that can happen; and it may be a generation from now or more until it does.
The day started out with speeches from both the Prime Minister and First Nations Assembly Grand Chief Shawn Atleo. I watched both speeches, and they felt like two parties at the start of a negotiation. The Prime Minister said they wouldn't repeal the Indian Act, but would find creative ways to work around it. The Grand Chief called the Indian Act an obstacle to prosperity; recalling images of a boulder on the highway.
At this point, it's safe to say everyone agrees the Indian Act has been doing more harm than good. In an ideal world, it would be gone, no matter what had to happen. In hindsight the Indian Act was an ignorant piece of legislation that paved the way for disastrous programs like the Residential schools, and in some ways the Reserve system itself. It broke the trust between the First Nations, and Europeans- a trust that is only in the early stages of being repaired.
But this isn't an ideal world. It's a lot messier than that, and the Prime Minister acknowledged that reality, when he referred to the Indian Act as a tree with deep roots that goes back through history. This legislation has behind it over 140 years (1876) of history, and traditions behind it. Breaking that is going to prove a huge challenge. And I don't think you can ignore it; I think they should at least acknowledge .
Not to mention what would happen to the amendments since that legislation was passed, including the Charter of Rights and Freedoms which enshrined what rights granted to Natives under the Indian Act. I would imagine the constitution would likely have to be reopened, or amended to allow for the changes. At this point realistically repealing the Indian Act wouldn't work unless there was some kind of framework that could potentially replace it.
Harper's so-called "creative ideas" could turn into finding ways to help First Nations to form more partnerships such as those he described in his speech. Or it could be something like working with First Nations to reform the Reserve system; making sure all who live on Reserves enjoys the same living conditions as those who live off of them.
The tree that is the Indian Act can't be cut down yet. The thing about trees is they occasionally need pruning, and reshaping to allow for new growth; and that takes creativity and skill. It may take a while, but I think the Indian Act will in the long term will be repealed. I just think it's going take a lot of creativity and hard work before that can happen; and it may be a generation from now or more until it does.
Saturday, January 14, 2012
Free Advice for the Liberal Party
In a shocking result, the federal Liberals went from Canada's second Party to Canada's third Party. Their stature took a huge hit, and left them asking the question of how to regain their former glory? How do they regain that former second party status?I think I have some free advice if you will from someone who just wants a third choice when we go to the polls in the next federal election.
My first is to redefine yourselves as the ideas party. What made the party work under Chretien was that you had the ideas to make Canada better, and the financial resources thanks to Paul Martin to make that happen. Become that party again; combine bold ideas and the finances that made them possible. If you've got the ideas; if you've got the substance then anyone can lead the party.
My second idea is about who could make it happen. I think Shelia Copps would make a great President. From everything I read/see/ and hear of her in the media, I think she's got the spine to make the necessary changes, and really crack the whip so to speak. She could also help interim leader Bob Rae get some attention for the party; something that's hard with the Liberals at its third-party ranking.
And as for the leadership; I'd close the door on Bob Rae running. Rae was Ontario's former Premier in the early '90'sbest known for "Rae Days-" which were days Public Sector Workers (nurses, teachers, and doctors) took off without pay. Many still remember what conditions were like under his Premiership, and I think were he to take the permanent leadership of the federal Liberal Party, Ontario would be dead to the Liberals for the duration. And one thing all political parties know is that you need Ontario and its 100+ electoral seats to have any chance at winning a federal election.
If not Rae, then who?
I would go for a complete unknown quantity. Someone younger that could energize the party, and reach out, and engage Canadian youth. I'd pick someone who is unattached to either Chretien or Paul Martin; someone who is unafraid to break some of the well established traditions and make their own. It should be someone who maybe has their own ideas, and their own way of doing things. An ambitious job description? Yes, but if the party wants to succeed and perhaps win the next federal election.
This has been some free advice for the Liberals; take it for what it's worth. Wanted, or notI have plenty more where this comes from, so stay tuned.
.
My first is to redefine yourselves as the ideas party. What made the party work under Chretien was that you had the ideas to make Canada better, and the financial resources thanks to Paul Martin to make that happen. Become that party again; combine bold ideas and the finances that made them possible. If you've got the ideas; if you've got the substance then anyone can lead the party.
My second idea is about who could make it happen. I think Shelia Copps would make a great President. From everything I read/see/ and hear of her in the media, I think she's got the spine to make the necessary changes, and really crack the whip so to speak. She could also help interim leader Bob Rae get some attention for the party; something that's hard with the Liberals at its third-party ranking.
And as for the leadership; I'd close the door on Bob Rae running. Rae was Ontario's former Premier in the early '90'sbest known for "Rae Days-" which were days Public Sector Workers (nurses, teachers, and doctors) took off without pay. Many still remember what conditions were like under his Premiership, and I think were he to take the permanent leadership of the federal Liberal Party, Ontario would be dead to the Liberals for the duration. And one thing all political parties know is that you need Ontario and its 100+ electoral seats to have any chance at winning a federal election.
If not Rae, then who?
I would go for a complete unknown quantity. Someone younger that could energize the party, and reach out, and engage Canadian youth. I'd pick someone who is unattached to either Chretien or Paul Martin; someone who is unafraid to break some of the well established traditions and make their own. It should be someone who maybe has their own ideas, and their own way of doing things. An ambitious job description? Yes, but if the party wants to succeed and perhaps win the next federal election.
This has been some free advice for the Liberals; take it for what it's worth. Wanted, or notI have plenty more where this comes from, so stay tuned.
.
Wednesday, January 4, 2012
The Velodrome Part #2: Has the Province Done Its Homework?
"What do Mississauga, Vaughn, and Hamilton know that we don't? Or what do we in Milton know that the others don't?"
A friend of mine asked me these questions as we waited for a Special Council Meeting to begin on the Velodrome. We didn't know the answers then, but they're starting to come out now. Last week Paul Henderson- Olympic Sailor, and lobbyist for Toronto's failed 1996 Olympic Bid, came out with a warning that he thought the Games would come in over budget. He is now among critics who think the Games' budget could come out over its $1.4 billion budget.
Milton has definitely done its homework on this project. My guess is Town Staff has checked the numbers many times trying to figure how this would work without impacting the tax base. And it likely will work with the support of Mattamy and their private partners. But just because Milton has done its homework, and due diligence in having a project that won't impact the tax base, doesn't mean other levels of government have done theirs.
And perhaps that's what Mississauga, Vaughn, and Hamilton know that we don't. Maybe they've realized that a certain provincial government having trouble balancing its books, hasn't. Maybe the other municipalities have realized the province has failed to take into account the need for extra public transit between venues, or venues that have been moved, or roads that need to be built/ closed down for transporting the athletes. And they want no part of it; who can blame them? Usually when the Province errs, it's the municipality that ends up paying the price.
I'm still in favour of the velodrome. I support it as an idea that would turn the spotlight on Milton in a positive way. But when someone like Paul Henderson with his credibility says the Games could turn out to be over budget maybe we should pause and listen. Maybe it's time to question the Province on its finances for the Games; How are we going to pay for the additional transit? (Milton still only has rush hour Go service), Are you going to be able to afford the needed university campus? and if so will it be "shovel-ready" by 2015. What about the cost to provincial roads? Has that been taken into account?
Henderson's comments on the Pan Am games make me wonder if the Province has done its homework on its portion of the budget. I think the time has come for someone to ask.
A friend of mine asked me these questions as we waited for a Special Council Meeting to begin on the Velodrome. We didn't know the answers then, but they're starting to come out now. Last week Paul Henderson- Olympic Sailor, and lobbyist for Toronto's failed 1996 Olympic Bid, came out with a warning that he thought the Games would come in over budget. He is now among critics who think the Games' budget could come out over its $1.4 billion budget.
Milton has definitely done its homework on this project. My guess is Town Staff has checked the numbers many times trying to figure how this would work without impacting the tax base. And it likely will work with the support of Mattamy and their private partners. But just because Milton has done its homework, and due diligence in having a project that won't impact the tax base, doesn't mean other levels of government have done theirs.
And perhaps that's what Mississauga, Vaughn, and Hamilton know that we don't. Maybe they've realized that a certain provincial government having trouble balancing its books, hasn't. Maybe the other municipalities have realized the province has failed to take into account the need for extra public transit between venues, or venues that have been moved, or roads that need to be built/ closed down for transporting the athletes. And they want no part of it; who can blame them? Usually when the Province errs, it's the municipality that ends up paying the price.
I'm still in favour of the velodrome. I support it as an idea that would turn the spotlight on Milton in a positive way. But when someone like Paul Henderson with his credibility says the Games could turn out to be over budget maybe we should pause and listen. Maybe it's time to question the Province on its finances for the Games; How are we going to pay for the additional transit? (Milton still only has rush hour Go service), Are you going to be able to afford the needed university campus? and if so will it be "shovel-ready" by 2015. What about the cost to provincial roads? Has that been taken into account?
Henderson's comments on the Pan Am games make me wonder if the Province has done its homework on its portion of the budget. I think the time has come for someone to ask.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)